G. Dehn, D. Kieser, R. Maxwell, G. Hooper, C. Frampton, M. Coates
{"title":"股骨髁的大小对膝关节骨性关节炎的发展有贡献吗?MRI随机回顾性研究","authors":"G. Dehn, D. Kieser, R. Maxwell, G. Hooper, C. Frampton, M. Coates","doi":"10.37532/JAHS.2019.8(4).284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Cam impingement in the hip is well recognised with the relative incongruity between the femoral head and acetabulum implicated in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). We propose that a similar situation may occur in the knee joint and explain the commonly observed anteromedial OA in medial compartment disease. This study asked whether a relatively larger femoral condyle could cause impingement on the smaller tibial articular surface and result in early osteoarthritis (OA). \n \nMethods: A retrospective randomised study of 400 age and sex matched knee x-ray and MRI scans of patients aged between 40 and 60 years was performed. Patients with any conditions that could affect their knee joint congruence or predispose them to degenerative changes were excluded. Measurements of the femoral and tibial articular surfaces were performed in the coronal and sagittal planes. The degree of OA was assessed with the modified ICRS grading system. Inter- and intra-observer bias was measured. \n \nResults: There were 234 knees with OA,171 (42.7%) with medial compartment OA, 35 (8.8%) lateral compartment OA and 28 (7%) with bicompartment OA. A significant difference was found between the ratio of the coronal width of the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau in the presence of early OA (0.85, 95% CI 0.842-0.858) compared those without OA (0.91, 95% CI 0.902-0.919) (p=0.001), and for the same comparison on the lateral side (0.866, (95% CI 0.853-0.879) for knees with OA and 0.917 (95% CI 0.911-0.924) without OA) (p=0.001). Additionally, knees with medial compartment OA had a relative ratio (comparison between medial and lateral ratios) of 0.905 (95% CI 0.896-0.913) compared to 0.993 in knees without OA (95% CI 0.984-1.002) (p=0.001). \n \nConclusion: Knees with OA had a significantly smaller femur to tibia coronal articular surface ratio. These findings did not support impingement of the femur on the tibial articular surface as a cause for OA. Given this previously unrecognised association, further research is needed to confirm and determine its clinical effect.","PeriodicalId":91304,"journal":{"name":"Journal of arthritis","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Size of the Femoral Condyle Contribute to the Development ofOsteoarthritis of the Knee? A Retrospective Randomised MRI Study\",\"authors\":\"G. Dehn, D. Kieser, R. Maxwell, G. Hooper, C. Frampton, M. Coates\",\"doi\":\"10.37532/JAHS.2019.8(4).284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Cam impingement in the hip is well recognised with the relative incongruity between the femoral head and acetabulum implicated in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). We propose that a similar situation may occur in the knee joint and explain the commonly observed anteromedial OA in medial compartment disease. This study asked whether a relatively larger femoral condyle could cause impingement on the smaller tibial articular surface and result in early osteoarthritis (OA). \\n \\nMethods: A retrospective randomised study of 400 age and sex matched knee x-ray and MRI scans of patients aged between 40 and 60 years was performed. Patients with any conditions that could affect their knee joint congruence or predispose them to degenerative changes were excluded. Measurements of the femoral and tibial articular surfaces were performed in the coronal and sagittal planes. The degree of OA was assessed with the modified ICRS grading system. Inter- and intra-observer bias was measured. \\n \\nResults: There were 234 knees with OA,171 (42.7%) with medial compartment OA, 35 (8.8%) lateral compartment OA and 28 (7%) with bicompartment OA. A significant difference was found between the ratio of the coronal width of the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau in the presence of early OA (0.85, 95% CI 0.842-0.858) compared those without OA (0.91, 95% CI 0.902-0.919) (p=0.001), and for the same comparison on the lateral side (0.866, (95% CI 0.853-0.879) for knees with OA and 0.917 (95% CI 0.911-0.924) without OA) (p=0.001). Additionally, knees with medial compartment OA had a relative ratio (comparison between medial and lateral ratios) of 0.905 (95% CI 0.896-0.913) compared to 0.993 in knees without OA (95% CI 0.984-1.002) (p=0.001). \\n \\nConclusion: Knees with OA had a significantly smaller femur to tibia coronal articular surface ratio. These findings did not support impingement of the femur on the tibial articular surface as a cause for OA. Given this previously unrecognised association, further research is needed to confirm and determine its clinical effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of arthritis\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of arthritis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37532/JAHS.2019.8(4).284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of arthritis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/JAHS.2019.8(4).284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:髋部凸轮撞击与股骨头和髋臼之间的相对不协调有关,与骨关节炎(OA)的发展有关。我们认为类似的情况可能发生在膝关节,并解释了在内侧腔室疾病中常见的前内侧骨关节炎。本研究探讨了相对较大的股骨髁是否会对较小的胫骨关节表面造成撞击并导致早期骨关节炎(OA)。方法:回顾性随机研究400例年龄和性别匹配的膝关节x线和MRI扫描患者,年龄在40至60岁之间。排除任何可能影响膝关节一致性或易发生退行性变化的患者。在冠状面和矢状面测量股骨和胫骨关节面。采用改良的ICRS分级系统评价OA程度。测量了观察者之间和观察者内部的偏倚。结果:骨性关节炎234例,内侧室骨关节炎171例(42.7%),外侧室骨关节炎35例(8.8%),双室骨关节炎28例(7%)。早期骨关节炎患者股骨内侧髁冠状宽度与胫骨内侧平台的比值(0.85,95% CI 0.842-0.858)与无骨关节炎患者(0.91,95% CI 0.902-0.919) (p=0.001)比较差异有统计学意义,有骨关节炎患者(0.866,95% CI 0.853-0.879)与无骨关节炎患者(0.917 (95% CI 0.911-0.924))的侧侧比较差异有统计学意义(p=0.001)。此外,患有内侧骨室性骨关节炎的膝关节的相对比值(内侧和外侧比值的比较)为0.905 (95% CI 0.896-0.913),而没有骨室性骨关节炎的膝关节的相对比值为0.993 (95% CI 0.984-1.002) (p=0.001)。结论:膝关节炎患者股骨与胫骨冠状关节面比明显减小。这些发现不支持股骨撞击胫骨关节面是骨性关节炎的原因。鉴于这种先前未被认识到的关联,需要进一步的研究来证实和确定其临床效果。
Does the Size of the Femoral Condyle Contribute to the Development ofOsteoarthritis of the Knee? A Retrospective Randomised MRI Study
Aim: Cam impingement in the hip is well recognised with the relative incongruity between the femoral head and acetabulum implicated in the development of osteoarthritis (OA). We propose that a similar situation may occur in the knee joint and explain the commonly observed anteromedial OA in medial compartment disease. This study asked whether a relatively larger femoral condyle could cause impingement on the smaller tibial articular surface and result in early osteoarthritis (OA).
Methods: A retrospective randomised study of 400 age and sex matched knee x-ray and MRI scans of patients aged between 40 and 60 years was performed. Patients with any conditions that could affect their knee joint congruence or predispose them to degenerative changes were excluded. Measurements of the femoral and tibial articular surfaces were performed in the coronal and sagittal planes. The degree of OA was assessed with the modified ICRS grading system. Inter- and intra-observer bias was measured.
Results: There were 234 knees with OA,171 (42.7%) with medial compartment OA, 35 (8.8%) lateral compartment OA and 28 (7%) with bicompartment OA. A significant difference was found between the ratio of the coronal width of the medial femoral condyle and the medial tibial plateau in the presence of early OA (0.85, 95% CI 0.842-0.858) compared those without OA (0.91, 95% CI 0.902-0.919) (p=0.001), and for the same comparison on the lateral side (0.866, (95% CI 0.853-0.879) for knees with OA and 0.917 (95% CI 0.911-0.924) without OA) (p=0.001). Additionally, knees with medial compartment OA had a relative ratio (comparison between medial and lateral ratios) of 0.905 (95% CI 0.896-0.913) compared to 0.993 in knees without OA (95% CI 0.984-1.002) (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Knees with OA had a significantly smaller femur to tibia coronal articular surface ratio. These findings did not support impingement of the femur on the tibial articular surface as a cause for OA. Given this previously unrecognised association, further research is needed to confirm and determine its clinical effect.