国家照料儿童的家庭生活

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Clarie Breen, J. Krutzinna, Katre Luhamaa, Marit Skivenes
{"title":"国家照料儿童的家庭生活","authors":"Clarie Breen, J. Krutzinna, Katre Luhamaa, Marit Skivenes","doi":"10.1163/15718182-28040001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper examines what set of familial circumstances allow for the justifiable interference with the right to respect for family life under Article 8, echr. We analyse all the Courts’ judgments on adoptions from care to find out what the Court means by a “family unit” and the “child´s best interest”. Our analysis show that the status and respect of the child’s de facto family life is changing. This resonates with a view that children do not only have formal rights, but that they are recognised as individuals within the family unit that states and courts must address directly. Family is both biological parents and child relationships, as well between children and foster parents, and to a more limited extent between siblings themselves. The Court’s understanding of family is in line with the theoretical literature, wherein the concept of family reflects the bonds created by personal, caring relationships and activities.","PeriodicalId":46399,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Life for Children in State Care\",\"authors\":\"Clarie Breen, J. Krutzinna, Katre Luhamaa, Marit Skivenes\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718182-28040001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis paper examines what set of familial circumstances allow for the justifiable interference with the right to respect for family life under Article 8, echr. We analyse all the Courts’ judgments on adoptions from care to find out what the Court means by a “family unit” and the “child´s best interest”. Our analysis show that the status and respect of the child’s de facto family life is changing. This resonates with a view that children do not only have formal rights, but that they are recognised as individuals within the family unit that states and courts must address directly. Family is both biological parents and child relationships, as well between children and foster parents, and to a more limited extent between siblings themselves. The Court’s understanding of family is in line with the theoretical literature, wherein the concept of family reflects the bonds created by personal, caring relationships and activities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Childrens Rights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Childrens Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-28040001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-28040001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文审查了哪一套家庭情况允许对《欧洲人权公约》第8条规定的尊重家庭生活的权利进行正当干涉。我们分析了法院关于收养的所有判决,以找出法院所说的“家庭单位”和“儿童的最大利益”是什么意思。我们的分析表明,儿童在实际家庭生活中的地位和受到的尊重正在发生变化。这与一种观点产生了共鸣,即儿童不仅拥有正式的权利,而且他们在国家和法院必须直接处理的家庭单位中被视为个人。家庭既包括亲生父母和孩子之间的关系,也包括孩子和养父母之间的关系,在更有限的程度上也包括兄弟姐妹之间的关系。法院对家庭的理解与理论文献是一致的,其中家庭的概念反映了个人的、关心的关系和活动所产生的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Life for Children in State Care
This paper examines what set of familial circumstances allow for the justifiable interference with the right to respect for family life under Article 8, echr. We analyse all the Courts’ judgments on adoptions from care to find out what the Court means by a “family unit” and the “child´s best interest”. Our analysis show that the status and respect of the child’s de facto family life is changing. This resonates with a view that children do not only have formal rights, but that they are recognised as individuals within the family unit that states and courts must address directly. Family is both biological parents and child relationships, as well between children and foster parents, and to a more limited extent between siblings themselves. The Court’s understanding of family is in line with the theoretical literature, wherein the concept of family reflects the bonds created by personal, caring relationships and activities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Childrens Rights
International Journal of Childrens Rights SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信