住院精神病中心对应用程序的应用程序所知:医学所认可的实验

Q4 Psychology
Fabian Mller, H. Wolf, Rahul Gupta, A. Schneeberger
{"title":"住院精神病中心对应用程序的应用程序所知:医学所认可的实验","authors":"Fabian Mller, H. Wolf, Rahul Gupta, A. Schneeberger","doi":"10.4414/sanp.2023.03371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Therapeutic leave (TL) or unaccompanied home visits before discharge, are well-established procedure during inpatient psychiatric treatment. At the beginning of 2020, reimbursable TL in Switzerland was limited to a maximum of 24 hours, without any available empirical data on the therapeutic relevance of this procedure. The present study examines the practice from 2015 to 2019 in a large psychiatric care facility in a rural setting. For this purpose, routine data of 2727 inpatient hospitalisations of 2028 patients were analysed descriptively. The relationship of TL and parameters of treatment outcome was investigated in multivariate regression models. In addition, it was examined how the new practice affected the duration and frequency of TL. Further, the attending physicians and psychologists of the facility were asked to assess the current procedure of TL (summer 2021). The data shows, that TL was a widely used and established instrument across all diagnostic groups. Regression analyses showed a significant correlation between the use of TL and better symptomatic treatment outcome as well as reduced rehospitalisation tendency before rationing. As expected, the change in practice led to a significant reduction in the duration of TLs. At the time of the survey after rationing, all 16 participating experts considered TL to be useful and 9 out of 16 advocated for more frequent or longer use of the instrument. In summary, the study suggests a positive impact of TL on treatment outcome parameters, including potentially reduced risk of relapse and urges caution in further reducing the established instrument of therapeutic leave before additional research results are available.","PeriodicalId":36878,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Archives of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anwendungspraxis in der stationären Psychiatrie: Medizinisch indizierte Belastungserprobung\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Mller, H. Wolf, Rahul Gupta, A. Schneeberger\",\"doi\":\"10.4414/sanp.2023.03371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Therapeutic leave (TL) or unaccompanied home visits before discharge, are well-established procedure during inpatient psychiatric treatment. At the beginning of 2020, reimbursable TL in Switzerland was limited to a maximum of 24 hours, without any available empirical data on the therapeutic relevance of this procedure. The present study examines the practice from 2015 to 2019 in a large psychiatric care facility in a rural setting. For this purpose, routine data of 2727 inpatient hospitalisations of 2028 patients were analysed descriptively. The relationship of TL and parameters of treatment outcome was investigated in multivariate regression models. In addition, it was examined how the new practice affected the duration and frequency of TL. Further, the attending physicians and psychologists of the facility were asked to assess the current procedure of TL (summer 2021). The data shows, that TL was a widely used and established instrument across all diagnostic groups. Regression analyses showed a significant correlation between the use of TL and better symptomatic treatment outcome as well as reduced rehospitalisation tendency before rationing. As expected, the change in practice led to a significant reduction in the duration of TLs. At the time of the survey after rationing, all 16 participating experts considered TL to be useful and 9 out of 16 advocated for more frequent or longer use of the instrument. In summary, the study suggests a positive impact of TL on treatment outcome parameters, including potentially reduced risk of relapse and urges caution in further reducing the established instrument of therapeutic leave before additional research results are available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Archives of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Archives of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4414/sanp.2023.03371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Archives of Neurology, Psychiatry and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4414/sanp.2023.03371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

治疗假(TL)或出院前无人陪伴的家访是住院精神病治疗期间的既定程序。2020年初,瑞士的可报销TL被限制在最长24小时内,没有任何关于该程序治疗相关性的可用经验数据。本研究调查了2015年至2019年在农村一家大型精神病护理机构的做法。为此,对2028名患者中2727名住院患者的常规数据进行了描述性分析。在多变量回归模型中研究TL与治疗结果参数的关系。此外,还研究了新做法如何影响TL的持续时间和频率。此外,该机构的主治医生和心理学家被要求评估TL的当前程序(2021年夏天)。数据显示,TL是所有诊断组中广泛使用和建立的仪器。回归分析显示,TL的使用与更好的症状治疗结果以及定量配给前再次住院趋势的减少之间存在显著相关性。正如预期的那样,实践的变化导致TL的持续时间显著缩短。在定量配给后进行调查时,所有16名参与专家都认为TL是有用的,16名专家中有9名主张更频繁或更长时间地使用该仪器。总之,该研究表明TL对治疗结果参数有积极影响,包括潜在的复发风险降低,并敦促在获得更多研究结果之前,谨慎进一步减少既定的治疗假工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anwendungspraxis in der stationären Psychiatrie: Medizinisch indizierte Belastungserprobung
Therapeutic leave (TL) or unaccompanied home visits before discharge, are well-established procedure during inpatient psychiatric treatment. At the beginning of 2020, reimbursable TL in Switzerland was limited to a maximum of 24 hours, without any available empirical data on the therapeutic relevance of this procedure. The present study examines the practice from 2015 to 2019 in a large psychiatric care facility in a rural setting. For this purpose, routine data of 2727 inpatient hospitalisations of 2028 patients were analysed descriptively. The relationship of TL and parameters of treatment outcome was investigated in multivariate regression models. In addition, it was examined how the new practice affected the duration and frequency of TL. Further, the attending physicians and psychologists of the facility were asked to assess the current procedure of TL (summer 2021). The data shows, that TL was a widely used and established instrument across all diagnostic groups. Regression analyses showed a significant correlation between the use of TL and better symptomatic treatment outcome as well as reduced rehospitalisation tendency before rationing. As expected, the change in practice led to a significant reduction in the duration of TLs. At the time of the survey after rationing, all 16 participating experts considered TL to be useful and 9 out of 16 advocated for more frequent or longer use of the instrument. In summary, the study suggests a positive impact of TL on treatment outcome parameters, including potentially reduced risk of relapse and urges caution in further reducing the established instrument of therapeutic leave before additional research results are available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信