工具构建的有效性分析:“知识社会绩效管理的管理方法”

IF 1.5 Q2 ECONOMICS
José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández
{"title":"工具构建的有效性分析:“知识社会绩效管理的管理方法”","authors":"José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández","doi":"10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154","PeriodicalId":52034,"journal":{"name":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","volume":"10 1","pages":"153-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento\",\"authors\":\"José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154\",\"PeriodicalId\":52034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"153-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文介绍了一项工具研究的结果,该研究涉及知识社会结果管理中工具管理方法的结构效度和可靠性分析,目的是获得最佳质量,从而提供有效可靠的证据。该文书的构建是基于管理周期的四个基本轴和《马拉喀什宣言》第一项原则所表达的内容。为了实现这一目标,该文书适用于公共行政部门的505名行政人员。使用探索性因子分析(EFA)技术进行结构效度分析,验证该技术数据的相关性,并使用Cronbach 's Alpha分析仪器的可靠性。EFA的结果显示,项目在析因模型中表示,只显示一个因素,这与提出的理论模型相对应。信度分析得到最优值(Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868)。鉴于这些结果,可以得出结论,该工具和集成它的元素准确地表示和测量了要评估的结构。Palabras clave |关键词Gestión para resultado, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conciciento, rúbrica analítica, conabilidad, fiabilidad, validz, validz de constructo。结果管理,管理方法,知识社会,分析准则,信度,信度,效度,结构效度。Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona,纪毅,Palacios-Almón,葛恩,y Juárez-Hernández,李国光(2020)。Análisis建立和发展工具的有效性:“建立和发展工具的指导方针Gestión建立和发展社会的成果”。科学研究Administración与Economía, 10(19), 153-165。https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 2020, 10(19),©2020,厄瓜多尔波利特利马齐尼亚大学ISSN印号:1390-6291;ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento
In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信