José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández
{"title":"工具构建的有效性分析:“知识社会绩效管理的管理方法”","authors":"José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández","doi":"10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154","PeriodicalId":52034,"journal":{"name":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","volume":"10 1","pages":"153-165"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento\",\"authors\":\"José Isaías Martínez-Corona, Gloria Edith Palacios-Almón, L. G. Juárez-Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154\",\"PeriodicalId\":52034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"153-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos-Revista de Ciencias de la Administracion y Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento
In this paper, the results of an instrumental study are presented that deals with the analysis of construct validity and reliability of the instrument: managerial approach in management for results in the knowledge society, with the objective to obtain an optimum quality so that provide valid and reliable evidence. The construction of the instrument was based on the four fundamental axes of the management cycle and what was expressed in the first principle of the Marrakech Declaration. To meet the objective, the instrument was applied to 505 executives of the public administration. The construct validity analysis was performed using the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) technique, verifying the pertinence of the data for this technique and analyzing the reliability of the instrument using Cronbach’s Alpha. The results of the EFA reveal that the items are represented in the factorial model, manifesting only one factor, which corresponds to the proposed theoretical model. Regarding the reliability analysis, an optimal value was obtained (Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.868). Given these results, it is concluded that the instrument and the elements that integrate it accurately represent and measure the construct that is intended to be evaluated. Palabras clave | keywords Gestión para resultados, enfoque directivo, sociedad del conocimiento, rúbrica analítica, confiabilidad, fiabilidad, validez, validez de constructo. Management for results, management approach, knowledge society, analytical rubric, reliability, reliability, validity, construct validity. Cómo citar: Martínez-Corona, J. I., Palacios-Almón, G. E., y Juárez-Hernández, L. G. (2020). Análisis de validez de constructo del instrumento: “Enfoque Directivo en la Gestión para Resultados en la Sociedad del Conocimiento”. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 10(19), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n19.2020.09 Retos, 10(19), 2020 © 2020, Universidad Politécnica Salesiana del Ecuador ISSN impreso: 1390-6291; ISSN electrónico: 1390-8618 154