关于Covid-19的教规的摘录和学术接待:2002 -2021年的文献综述

Ahmad Fawaid
{"title":"关于Covid-19的教规的摘录和学术接待:2002 -2021年的文献综述","authors":"Ahmad Fawaid","doi":"10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study aims to observe the contestation and academic reception of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Covid-19. These fatwas invite many responses in academic circles written in reputable journal articles. With a qualitative research paradigm and using Hans Robert Jauss text reception theory, this research concludes that; this study found four typologies of the MUI Fatwa monograph on Covid-19 during 2020-2021; namely (1) Monograph Typology, which discusses the Role of Fatwa (6 titles); (2) Discussing aspects of contact with other scientific disciplines, such as Maqāṣid,; (3) Unraveling the 'tangled thread' conflicting interpretations of the fatwa; (4) an article that measures the level of obedience of the Indonesian Muslim community to the MUI fatwa. Of the existing articles, 13 were built with justification based on the text, 5 articles were built with apologetic reasoning, and 3 used critical reasoning. From this conclusion, this study confirms that the academic response to the MUI Fatwa on Covid-19 also experienced Fragmentation, Resistance, and Appreciation.","PeriodicalId":33042,"journal":{"name":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kontestasi Dan Resepsi Akademis Atas Fatwa Mui Tentang Covid-19: Tinjauan Bibliografis Atas Monografi Tahun 2020-2021\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Fawaid\",\"doi\":\"10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: This study aims to observe the contestation and academic reception of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Covid-19. These fatwas invite many responses in academic circles written in reputable journal articles. With a qualitative research paradigm and using Hans Robert Jauss text reception theory, this research concludes that; this study found four typologies of the MUI Fatwa monograph on Covid-19 during 2020-2021; namely (1) Monograph Typology, which discusses the Role of Fatwa (6 titles); (2) Discussing aspects of contact with other scientific disciplines, such as Maqāṣid,; (3) Unraveling the 'tangled thread' conflicting interpretations of the fatwa; (4) an article that measures the level of obedience of the Indonesian Muslim community to the MUI fatwa. Of the existing articles, 13 were built with justification based on the text, 5 articles were built with apologetic reasoning, and 3 used critical reasoning. From this conclusion, this study confirms that the academic response to the MUI Fatwa on Covid-19 also experienced Fragmentation, Resistance, and Appreciation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在观察印度尼西亚乌莱马理事会(MUI)发布的关于新冠肺炎的法令的争议和学术接受情况。这些法令在学术界引起了许多反响,发表在声誉良好的期刊文章中。本研究采用定性研究范式,运用汉斯-罗伯特·贾斯文本接受理论,得出以下结论:;这项研究发现,在2020-2021年期间,MUI Fatwa关于新冠肺炎的专著有四种类型;即(1)专著类型学,讨论法特瓦的作用(6个标题);(2) 讨论与其他科学学科接触的各个方面,如Maqāṣid,;(3) 解开对法特瓦的相互矛盾的解释;(4) 一篇衡量印尼穆斯林社区对MUI法特瓦的服从程度的文章。在现有的文章中,13篇是基于文本的正当性构建的,5篇是基于道歉推理构建的,3篇使用了批判性推理。根据这一结论,本研究证实,学术界对MUI Fatwa关于新冠肺炎的反应也经历了分裂、抵抗和赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kontestasi Dan Resepsi Akademis Atas Fatwa Mui Tentang Covid-19: Tinjauan Bibliografis Atas Monografi Tahun 2020-2021
Abstract: This study aims to observe the contestation and academic reception of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Covid-19. These fatwas invite many responses in academic circles written in reputable journal articles. With a qualitative research paradigm and using Hans Robert Jauss text reception theory, this research concludes that; this study found four typologies of the MUI Fatwa monograph on Covid-19 during 2020-2021; namely (1) Monograph Typology, which discusses the Role of Fatwa (6 titles); (2) Discussing aspects of contact with other scientific disciplines, such as Maqāṣid,; (3) Unraveling the 'tangled thread' conflicting interpretations of the fatwa; (4) an article that measures the level of obedience of the Indonesian Muslim community to the MUI fatwa. Of the existing articles, 13 were built with justification based on the text, 5 articles were built with apologetic reasoning, and 3 used critical reasoning. From this conclusion, this study confirms that the academic response to the MUI Fatwa on Covid-19 also experienced Fragmentation, Resistance, and Appreciation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信