磁场对Bebig60Co HDR源剂量分布的影响

中华放射肿瘤学杂志 Pub Date : 2020-03-15 DOI:10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.03.008

Zhenguo Cui, Jiayi Chen, W. Yun, Qi Liu, Yanling Bai

{"title":"磁场对Bebig60Co HDR源剂量分布的影响","authors":"Zhenguo Cui, Jiayi Chen, W. Yun, Qi Liu, Yanling Bai","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\r\nTo evaluate the impact of an external magnetic field on the dose distribution and electronic disequilibrium region around a Bebig type 60Co HDR brachytherapy source and to judge the feasibility of applying MRI scanner during brachytherapy.\r\n\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nThe source model was established based on the Monte Carlo package Geant4 software. The simulated geometries consisted of the 60Co source inside a water phantom of 10.0cm×10.0cm×10.0cm in size. The magnetic field strength of the 0T, 1.5T and 3.0T was considered, respectively. The voxels with a size of 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.5 mm were established along the x-, y-and z-axis. The influence of the magnetic field on the Kerma (kinetic energy released to matter) distribution and dose distribution within the 10.0mm region from the source center was evaluated. Furthermore, the ratio of the Kerma to dose as a function of the distance to the center source was acquired.\r\n\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThe 1.5T magnetic field exerted no effect on the dose distribution adjacent to 60Co HDR brachytherapy source, whereas3.0T magnetic field caused significant increase in the dose distribution within r<6 mm from the source center. The dose distribution was increased by 40% at r=5.4 mm from the source center. The ratio of Kerma to dose was less than 1 within the region of 1.2 mm<r<6.0 mm, suggesting that 3.0T magnetic field can lead to electronic disequilibrium within a larger region from the source center.\r\n\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nFor Bebig 60Co HDR brachytherapy source, it is safe and reliable to apply1.5T external magnetic field. Nevertheless, 3.0T magnetic field can cause high dose risk. Consequently, safety assessment and verification should be delivered prior to clinical application.\r\n\r\n\r\nKey words: \r\nMagnetic field; Brachytherapy; Dose; Kerma","PeriodicalId":10288,"journal":{"name":"中华放射肿瘤学杂志","volume":"29 1","pages":"193-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of a magnetic field on the dose distribution using the Bebig60Co HDR sources\",\"authors\":\"Zhenguo Cui, Jiayi Chen, W. Yun, Qi Liu, Yanling Bai\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.03.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\r\\nTo evaluate the impact of an external magnetic field on the dose distribution and electronic disequilibrium region around a Bebig type 60Co HDR brachytherapy source and to judge the feasibility of applying MRI scanner during brachytherapy.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nMethods\\r\\nThe source model was established based on the Monte Carlo package Geant4 software. The simulated geometries consisted of the 60Co source inside a water phantom of 10.0cm×10.0cm×10.0cm in size. The magnetic field strength of the 0T, 1.5T and 3.0T was considered, respectively. The voxels with a size of 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.5 mm were established along the x-, y-and z-axis. The influence of the magnetic field on the Kerma (kinetic energy released to matter) distribution and dose distribution within the 10.0mm region from the source center was evaluated. Furthermore, the ratio of the Kerma to dose as a function of the distance to the center source was acquired.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nThe 1.5T magnetic field exerted no effect on the dose distribution adjacent to 60Co HDR brachytherapy source, whereas3.0T magnetic field caused significant increase in the dose distribution within r<6 mm from the source center. The dose distribution was increased by 40% at r=5.4 mm from the source center. The ratio of Kerma to dose was less than 1 within the region of 1.2 mm<r<6.0 mm, suggesting that 3.0T magnetic field can lead to electronic disequilibrium within a larger region from the source center.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions\\r\\nFor Bebig 60Co HDR brachytherapy source, it is safe and reliable to apply1.5T external magnetic field. Nevertheless, 3.0T magnetic field can cause high dose risk. Consequently, safety assessment and verification should be delivered prior to clinical application.\\r\\n\\r\\n\\r\\nKey words: \\r\\nMagnetic field; Brachytherapy; Dose; Kerma\",\"PeriodicalId\":10288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射肿瘤学杂志\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"193-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射肿瘤学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.03.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射肿瘤学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1004-4221.2020.03.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价外磁场对贝比格型60Co HDR近距离放射治疗源周围剂量分布和电子不平衡区的影响，判断近距离放射治疗中应用MRI扫描仪的可行性。方法基于蒙特卡罗软件包Geant4软件建立源模型。模拟的几何形状包括60Co源在10.0cm×10.0cm×10.0cm大小的水影内。分别考虑0T、1.5T和3.0T的磁场强度。沿x、y、z轴分别建立尺寸为0.2 mm、0.5 mm和0.5 mm的体素。评价了磁场对源中心10.0mm范围内物质释放动能(Kerma)分布和剂量分布的影响。此外，还获得了Kerma与剂量的比值作为到中心源距离的函数。结果1.5T磁场对60Co HDR近距离放疗源附近的剂量分布没有影响，而3.0 t磁场对距离源中心r<6 mm范围内的剂量分布有显著增加。在距源中心r=5.4 mm处，剂量分布增加了40%。在1.2 mm本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The impact of a magnetic field on the dose distribution using the Bebig60Co HDR sources

Objective To evaluate the impact of an external magnetic field on the dose distribution and electronic disequilibrium region around a Bebig type 60Co HDR brachytherapy source and to judge the feasibility of applying MRI scanner during brachytherapy. Methods The source model was established based on the Monte Carlo package Geant4 software. The simulated geometries consisted of the 60Co source inside a water phantom of 10.0cm×10.0cm×10.0cm in size. The magnetic field strength of the 0T, 1.5T and 3.0T was considered, respectively. The voxels with a size of 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm and 0.5 mm were established along the x-, y-and z-axis. The influence of the magnetic field on the Kerma (kinetic energy released to matter) distribution and dose distribution within the 10.0mm region from the source center was evaluated. Furthermore, the ratio of the Kerma to dose as a function of the distance to the center source was acquired. Results The 1.5T magnetic field exerted no effect on the dose distribution adjacent to 60Co HDR brachytherapy source, whereas3.0T magnetic field caused significant increase in the dose distribution within r<6 mm from the source center. The dose distribution was increased by 40% at r=5.4 mm from the source center. The ratio of Kerma to dose was less than 1 within the region of 1.2 mm

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

中华放射肿瘤学杂志

自引率

0.00%

发文量

6375

期刊介绍： The Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology is a national academic journal sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It was founded in 1992 and the title was written by Chen Minzhang, the former Minister of Health. Its predecessor was the Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, which was founded in 1987. The journal is an authoritative journal in the field of radiation oncology in my country. It focuses on clinical tumor radiotherapy, tumor radiation physics, tumor radiation biology, and thermal therapy. Its main readers are middle and senior clinical doctors and scientific researchers. It is now a monthly journal with a large 16-page format and 80 pages of text. For many years, it has adhered to the principle of combining theory with practice and combining improvement with popularization. It now has columns such as monographs, head and neck tumors (monographs), chest tumors (monographs), abdominal tumors (monographs), physics, technology, biology (monographs), reviews, and investigations and research.