未来是去增长:一个超越资本主义的世界指南

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Aila Trasi
{"title":"未来是去增长:一个超越资本主义的世界指南","authors":"Aila Trasi","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2023.2237814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"with cultural practices or identities that offer their own meaningful answers to major normative questions. In Russia’s case, similar contradictions are evident in the proposed “alternative” to the unipolar order; namely, the notion that Russia can supposedly protect the self-determination of the “periphery” from U.S. domination through its own military interventions and territorial acquisitions (71, 200). Given recent debates about the links between ideological views in Russia and the state’s international policies, Chebankova’s work is timely. As she indicates, some may take exception to the categorizations underlying her analysis, such as her decision to exclude fascism from her list of major ideological tendencies. Yet the analysis itself provides a rich foundation on which to raise further questions about how best to understand right-wing ideologies that have grown more prominent in Russia and the West. The book helps clarify the nuances of the country’s domestic politics, emphasizing the ideological commitments, divergences, and competitions that shape Russian politics from within, among those both aligned and opposed to Putin’s leadership. As a result, Chebankova complicates images of Russia as merely totalitarian or kleptocratic, revealing more intricate lines of ideological contest than one might expect from an outside perspective.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"45 1","pages":"561 - 563"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future Is Degrowth: A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism\",\"authors\":\"Aila Trasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2023.2237814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"with cultural practices or identities that offer their own meaningful answers to major normative questions. In Russia’s case, similar contradictions are evident in the proposed “alternative” to the unipolar order; namely, the notion that Russia can supposedly protect the self-determination of the “periphery” from U.S. domination through its own military interventions and territorial acquisitions (71, 200). Given recent debates about the links between ideological views in Russia and the state’s international policies, Chebankova’s work is timely. As she indicates, some may take exception to the categorizations underlying her analysis, such as her decision to exclude fascism from her list of major ideological tendencies. Yet the analysis itself provides a rich foundation on which to raise further questions about how best to understand right-wing ideologies that have grown more prominent in Russia and the West. The book helps clarify the nuances of the country’s domestic politics, emphasizing the ideological commitments, divergences, and competitions that shape Russian politics from within, among those both aligned and opposed to Putin’s leadership. As a result, Chebankova complicates images of Russia as merely totalitarian or kleptocratic, revealing more intricate lines of ideological contest than one might expect from an outside perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"561 - 563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2237814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2023.2237814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

他们的文化习俗或身份为主要的规范性问题提供了自己有意义的答案。在俄罗斯的情况下,类似的矛盾在单极秩序的“替代方案”中也很明显;也就是说,俄罗斯可以通过自己的军事干预和领土收购来保护“外围”的自决免受美国的统治。鉴于最近关于俄罗斯意识形态观点与国家国际政策之间关系的争论,切班科娃的工作是及时的。正如她所指出的,有些人可能会对她的分析所依据的分类提出异议,比如她决定将法西斯主义从她的主要意识形态倾向清单中排除。然而,分析本身提供了一个丰富的基础,在此基础上提出了进一步的问题,即如何最好地理解在俄罗斯和西方日益突出的右翼意识形态。这本书有助于澄清俄罗斯国内政治的细微差别,强调了从内部塑造俄罗斯政治的意识形态承诺、分歧和竞争,包括那些支持和反对普京领导的人。因此,切班科娃将俄罗斯仅仅是极权主义或盗贼统治的形象复杂化,揭示了意识形态之争的复杂程度,超出了外界的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future Is Degrowth: A Guide to a World beyond Capitalism
with cultural practices or identities that offer their own meaningful answers to major normative questions. In Russia’s case, similar contradictions are evident in the proposed “alternative” to the unipolar order; namely, the notion that Russia can supposedly protect the self-determination of the “periphery” from U.S. domination through its own military interventions and territorial acquisitions (71, 200). Given recent debates about the links between ideological views in Russia and the state’s international policies, Chebankova’s work is timely. As she indicates, some may take exception to the categorizations underlying her analysis, such as her decision to exclude fascism from her list of major ideological tendencies. Yet the analysis itself provides a rich foundation on which to raise further questions about how best to understand right-wing ideologies that have grown more prominent in Russia and the West. The book helps clarify the nuances of the country’s domestic politics, emphasizing the ideological commitments, divergences, and competitions that shape Russian politics from within, among those both aligned and opposed to Putin’s leadership. As a result, Chebankova complicates images of Russia as merely totalitarian or kleptocratic, revealing more intricate lines of ideological contest than one might expect from an outside perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信