“所有的理论都是灰色的……但生命之树永远是绿色的。”

Q2 Social Sciences
P. Waterson
{"title":"“所有的理论都是灰色的……但生命之树永远是绿色的。”","authors":"P. Waterson","doi":"10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this editorial is taken from a well-known quote by the German poet and philosopher J.W. Goethe (1749–1832). Goethe was partly lamenting the amount of time other scientists and thinkers spend on matters which largely theoretical, in contrast to those who gather data or use their intuition and experience to drive their work. Within the context of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety (PPHS) the quote might at first appear to have little relevance, however one of the aims of PPHS is to act as a forum for the discussion of scientific and practice-based aspects of occupational health and safety. Part of this involves theory and theoretical matters as these often crop up in discussions of the relevance of one rival theory of health and safety over another (e.g. comparisons between High Reliability Organization Theory and Resilience Engineering and their applicability to safety critical contexts – e.g. Haavik, Antonsen, Rosness, & Hale, 2019; Harvey, Waterson, & Dainty, 2019; Behavioural safety and its influence on safety culture – e.g. Marsh, 2017). One of the key roles of theory is to generate predictions and to arrive at something (e.g. an intervention) which can be tested and verified. Without a sound and detailed theory (or a set of theories) research runs the risk of delivering only anecdotal evidence which in turn, is difficult to translate into practice. As Andrew Hale (2014) puts it:","PeriodicalId":43946,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","volume":"17 1","pages":"95 - 97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘All theory is gray … but forever green is the tree of life’\",\"authors\":\"P. Waterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The title of this editorial is taken from a well-known quote by the German poet and philosopher J.W. Goethe (1749–1832). Goethe was partly lamenting the amount of time other scientists and thinkers spend on matters which largely theoretical, in contrast to those who gather data or use their intuition and experience to drive their work. Within the context of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety (PPHS) the quote might at first appear to have little relevance, however one of the aims of PPHS is to act as a forum for the discussion of scientific and practice-based aspects of occupational health and safety. Part of this involves theory and theoretical matters as these often crop up in discussions of the relevance of one rival theory of health and safety over another (e.g. comparisons between High Reliability Organization Theory and Resilience Engineering and their applicability to safety critical contexts – e.g. Haavik, Antonsen, Rosness, & Hale, 2019; Harvey, Waterson, & Dainty, 2019; Behavioural safety and its influence on safety culture – e.g. Marsh, 2017). One of the key roles of theory is to generate predictions and to arrive at something (e.g. an intervention) which can be tested and verified. Without a sound and detailed theory (or a set of theories) research runs the risk of delivering only anecdotal evidence which in turn, is difficult to translate into practice. As Andrew Hale (2014) puts it:\",\"PeriodicalId\":43946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Practice in Health and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2019.1662220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇社论的标题取自德国诗人和哲学家J.W.歌德(1749-1832)的一句名言。歌德在一定程度上对其他科学家和思想家花在主要是理论性问题上的时间感到遗憾,而那些收集数据或利用直觉和经验来推动工作的科学家和思想家则相反。在《健康与安全政策与实践》(PPHS)的背景下,这句话起初似乎没有什么相关性,但PPHS的目的之一是作为一个论坛,讨论职业健康与安全的科学和实践方面。其中一部分涉及理论和理论问题,因为这些问题经常出现在讨论一种竞争对手的健康和安全理论与另一种理论的相关性时(例如,高可靠性组织理论和弹性工程之间的比较及其在安全关键环境中的适用性——例如Haavik、Antonsen、Rosness和Hale,2019;Harvey、Waterson和Dainty,2019;行为安全及其对安全文化的影响——例如Marsh,2017)。理论的关键作用之一是产生预测,并得出可以测试和验证的结果(例如干预)。如果没有一个健全而详细的理论(或一套理论),研究就有可能只提供轶事证据,而这些证据又很难转化为实践。正如Andrew Hale(2014)所言:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘All theory is gray … but forever green is the tree of life’
The title of this editorial is taken from a well-known quote by the German poet and philosopher J.W. Goethe (1749–1832). Goethe was partly lamenting the amount of time other scientists and thinkers spend on matters which largely theoretical, in contrast to those who gather data or use their intuition and experience to drive their work. Within the context of Policy and Practice in Health and Safety (PPHS) the quote might at first appear to have little relevance, however one of the aims of PPHS is to act as a forum for the discussion of scientific and practice-based aspects of occupational health and safety. Part of this involves theory and theoretical matters as these often crop up in discussions of the relevance of one rival theory of health and safety over another (e.g. comparisons between High Reliability Organization Theory and Resilience Engineering and their applicability to safety critical contexts – e.g. Haavik, Antonsen, Rosness, & Hale, 2019; Harvey, Waterson, & Dainty, 2019; Behavioural safety and its influence on safety culture – e.g. Marsh, 2017). One of the key roles of theory is to generate predictions and to arrive at something (e.g. an intervention) which can be tested and verified. Without a sound and detailed theory (or a set of theories) research runs the risk of delivering only anecdotal evidence which in turn, is difficult to translate into practice. As Andrew Hale (2014) puts it:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety
Policy and Practice in Health and Safety PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信