评估地方当局实践中的规划收益

Q1 Social Sciences
E. Micelli, Agostino Valier
{"title":"评估地方当局实践中的规划收益","authors":"E. Micelli, Agostino Valier","doi":"10.48264/VVSIEV-20202703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The public/private partnerships have been a successful innovation in the implementation of urban plans and they became an ordinary instrument in city planning and management. In the partnerships, agreements on zoning allow more advantageous planning rules. The corresponding economic gain is shared between the administration and the property. Research has devoted attention to the nature of the economic gain, investigating its nature and how it should be shared. Less effort has been devoted instead to understand how general norms have found application in the administrative action of public authorities. The research focuses on these aspects and investigates methodologies and techniques with which public administrations have evaluated public/private partnerships in cities development projects. The study identified Veneto Region as a privileged area of research. We examined the administrative acts approved by the municipalities with regard to the public/private partnerships allowed by Veneto planning law (LR 11/2004) and by decree 380/2001 derogatory building permits. Attention was paid to provincial capitals and, in order to have a representative sample of smaller towns, the survey considered all the municipalities of the Vicenza province. Conclusions of the research are controversial. The economic issue seems well managed: local administrations acquired the economic ratio of the agreements and the necessity of sharing the gain resulting from administrative decisions between public authorities and landlords. Local acts focus on valuation methodologies, in particular on automatic or quasi-automatic valuations, with debatable outcomes: the application of automatic procedures does not necessarily lead to quality results. Lastly, in territories substantially homogeneous, only a few kilometers away, levy rates can be very different, posing obvious and relevant problems of effectiveness and fairness.","PeriodicalId":37741,"journal":{"name":"Valori e Valutazioni","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the planning gain in the practices of local authorities [La misura dell’accordo. la valutazione delle contribuzioni straordinarie tra norme di legge e prassi degli enti locali]\",\"authors\":\"E. Micelli, Agostino Valier\",\"doi\":\"10.48264/VVSIEV-20202703\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The public/private partnerships have been a successful innovation in the implementation of urban plans and they became an ordinary instrument in city planning and management. In the partnerships, agreements on zoning allow more advantageous planning rules. The corresponding economic gain is shared between the administration and the property. Research has devoted attention to the nature of the economic gain, investigating its nature and how it should be shared. Less effort has been devoted instead to understand how general norms have found application in the administrative action of public authorities. The research focuses on these aspects and investigates methodologies and techniques with which public administrations have evaluated public/private partnerships in cities development projects. The study identified Veneto Region as a privileged area of research. We examined the administrative acts approved by the municipalities with regard to the public/private partnerships allowed by Veneto planning law (LR 11/2004) and by decree 380/2001 derogatory building permits. Attention was paid to provincial capitals and, in order to have a representative sample of smaller towns, the survey considered all the municipalities of the Vicenza province. Conclusions of the research are controversial. The economic issue seems well managed: local administrations acquired the economic ratio of the agreements and the necessity of sharing the gain resulting from administrative decisions between public authorities and landlords. Local acts focus on valuation methodologies, in particular on automatic or quasi-automatic valuations, with debatable outcomes: the application of automatic procedures does not necessarily lead to quality results. Lastly, in territories substantially homogeneous, only a few kilometers away, levy rates can be very different, posing obvious and relevant problems of effectiveness and fairness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Valori e Valutazioni\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20202703\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Valori e Valutazioni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48264/VVSIEV-20202703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公私伙伴关系是实施城市规划的一项成功创新,已成为城市规划和管理的常用工具。在合作伙伴关系中,分区协议允许更有利的规划规则。相应的经济收益由行政部门和财产共享。研究将注意力集中在经济收益的性质上,调查其性质以及如何分享。相反,在了解一般规范如何在公共当局的行政行为中得到应用方面所作的努力较少。研究的重点是这些方面,并调查了公共行政部门评估城市发展项目中的公共/私人伙伴关系的方法和技术。该研究将威尼托地区确定为研究的特权地区。我们审查了威尼托规划法(LR 11/2004)和第380/2001号法令所允许的市政当局批准的关于公私合作伙伴关系的行政行为。注意到省会城市,为了有代表性的小城镇抽样,调查考虑了维琴察省的所有城市。这项研究的结论是有争议的。经济问题似乎处理得很好:地方行政当局获得了协议的经济比例,并且有必要在公共当局和地主之间分享行政决定带来的收益。地方法律侧重于估值方法,特别是自动或准自动估值,其结果值得商榷:应用自动程序不一定会产生高质量的结果。最后,在基本相同的领土上,只有几公里远,征税率可能非常不同,造成明显的有效性和公平性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the planning gain in the practices of local authorities [La misura dell’accordo. la valutazione delle contribuzioni straordinarie tra norme di legge e prassi degli enti locali]
The public/private partnerships have been a successful innovation in the implementation of urban plans and they became an ordinary instrument in city planning and management. In the partnerships, agreements on zoning allow more advantageous planning rules. The corresponding economic gain is shared between the administration and the property. Research has devoted attention to the nature of the economic gain, investigating its nature and how it should be shared. Less effort has been devoted instead to understand how general norms have found application in the administrative action of public authorities. The research focuses on these aspects and investigates methodologies and techniques with which public administrations have evaluated public/private partnerships in cities development projects. The study identified Veneto Region as a privileged area of research. We examined the administrative acts approved by the municipalities with regard to the public/private partnerships allowed by Veneto planning law (LR 11/2004) and by decree 380/2001 derogatory building permits. Attention was paid to provincial capitals and, in order to have a representative sample of smaller towns, the survey considered all the municipalities of the Vicenza province. Conclusions of the research are controversial. The economic issue seems well managed: local administrations acquired the economic ratio of the agreements and the necessity of sharing the gain resulting from administrative decisions between public authorities and landlords. Local acts focus on valuation methodologies, in particular on automatic or quasi-automatic valuations, with debatable outcomes: the application of automatic procedures does not necessarily lead to quality results. Lastly, in territories substantially homogeneous, only a few kilometers away, levy rates can be very different, posing obvious and relevant problems of effectiveness and fairness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Valori e Valutazioni
Valori e Valutazioni Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: La rivista ufficiale della SIEV si intitola “Valori e Valutazioni. Teorie ed esperienze”/“Valori e Valutazioni” is the official journal of the Italian Society of Property Evaluation and Investment Decision (SIEV).La rivista si propone di diffondere la cultura della valutazione nei seguenti campi tematici: • architettura, ingegneria civile, edile, dell’ambiente e del territorio, • pianificazione territoriale, urbanistica e ambientale; • investimenti pubblici e privati di natura immobiliare e infrastrutturale; • mercato immobiliare e produzione edilizia; • tutela, valorizzazione e gestione dei beni culturali e ambientali; • finanza immobiliare. A tal fine analizza originali problemi valutativi ed espone applicazioni metodologiche avanzate, alimentando il dibattito scientifico-culturale. Data la multidisciplinarietà dei temi trattati, la rivista si rivolge ad un pubblico molto ampio ed eterogeneo costituito da studiosi e ricercatori, professionisti, imprenditori, tecnici e funzionari della Pubblica Amministrazione.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信