{"title":"导言:生态学课程:社区团结、土著知识、危机中的公民社会","authors":"Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Russia’s society has been wrenched by the war in Ukraine and civicpolitical divisions at home, one of its most critical problems, the environment, has been pushed aside. Yet ecological values and activism are more important than ever, as Russia’s citizens must contend with the exacerbation of natural resource destruction and climate crisis ramifications on an accelerated and unprecedented scale. The articles featured in this finale double issue of our journal were solicited well before the war began in February 2022, but most have been written and revised since, with each author feeling a sense of urgency and distress. What began as a project to highlight the ecology activist successes in a few high-profile cases illustrating civic society mobilization in Russia has instead moved to analyzing disaster zones in various degrees of devastation. What can we learn from the experiences of valiant ecology activists and besieged civic society leaders? How can Indigenous knowledge gleaned and practiced over centuries help in managing ecological and societal stresses? How can Russia’s urban scientific and rural Indigenous communities communicate productively with each other, especially when some scientists are Indigenous? How could state legal and policy mechanisms mitigate environmental destruction rather than abet it? These are some of the questions asked in this issue. The authors come from diverse backgrounds, Russian and non-Russian, rural and urban, scientific and political, activist and scholarly. Each article qualifies as anthropology in the best, broadest sense of the word. The authors are ethnographic in their descriptions, sensitive to human rights at many levels, and strive to accurately portray the voices of their interlocutors. Each case featured here resonates beyond the local, although their venues and contexts may not be well known or understood in the European or English-language-oriented world. Some have briefly appeared in the international news due to their shock value, whether massive fires that spread smoke from Far East Russia to Alaska in the summers of 2020–2022, ANTHROPOLOGY & ARCHEOLOGY OF EURASIA 2020, VOL. 59, NOS. 3–4, 167–176 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis\",\"authors\":\"Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As Russia’s society has been wrenched by the war in Ukraine and civicpolitical divisions at home, one of its most critical problems, the environment, has been pushed aside. Yet ecological values and activism are more important than ever, as Russia’s citizens must contend with the exacerbation of natural resource destruction and climate crisis ramifications on an accelerated and unprecedented scale. The articles featured in this finale double issue of our journal were solicited well before the war began in February 2022, but most have been written and revised since, with each author feeling a sense of urgency and distress. What began as a project to highlight the ecology activist successes in a few high-profile cases illustrating civic society mobilization in Russia has instead moved to analyzing disaster zones in various degrees of devastation. What can we learn from the experiences of valiant ecology activists and besieged civic society leaders? How can Indigenous knowledge gleaned and practiced over centuries help in managing ecological and societal stresses? How can Russia’s urban scientific and rural Indigenous communities communicate productively with each other, especially when some scientists are Indigenous? How could state legal and policy mechanisms mitigate environmental destruction rather than abet it? These are some of the questions asked in this issue. The authors come from diverse backgrounds, Russian and non-Russian, rural and urban, scientific and political, activist and scholarly. Each article qualifies as anthropology in the best, broadest sense of the word. The authors are ethnographic in their descriptions, sensitive to human rights at many levels, and strive to accurately portray the voices of their interlocutors. Each case featured here resonates beyond the local, although their venues and contexts may not be well known or understood in the European or English-language-oriented world. Some have briefly appeared in the international news due to their shock value, whether massive fires that spread smoke from Far East Russia to Alaska in the summers of 2020–2022, ANTHROPOLOGY & ARCHEOLOGY OF EURASIA 2020, VOL. 59, NOS. 3–4, 167–176 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534\",\"PeriodicalId\":35495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着俄罗斯社会被乌克兰战争和国内的公民政治分歧所折磨,其最关键的问题之一——环境问题被搁置一边。然而,生态价值观和行动主义比以往任何时候都更加重要,因为俄罗斯公民必须以前所未有的速度应对自然资源破坏和气候危机后果的加剧。我们杂志的最后一期双刊中的文章是在2022年2月战争开始之前很久就被征求的,但大多数都是在那之后写的和修改的,每个作者都感到一种紧迫感和痛苦。最初的项目是强调生态活动家在几个引人注目的案例中取得的成功,说明俄罗斯的公民社会动员,但现在却转向了分析不同程度破坏的灾区。我们可以从勇敢的生态活动家和被围困的公民社会领袖的经历中学到什么?几个世纪以来收集和实践的土著知识如何有助于管理生态和社会压力?俄罗斯的城市科学社区和农村土著社区如何有效地相互交流,特别是当一些科学家是土著时?国家法律和政策机制如何能够减轻环境破坏,而不是助长这种破坏?这些是本期提出的一些问题。作者来自不同的背景,俄罗斯人和非俄罗斯人,农村和城市,科学和政治,活动家和学者。每一篇文章都有资格成为最优秀、最广泛意义上的人类学。作者在他们的描述是民族志,敏感的人权在许多层面上,并努力准确地描绘他们的对话者的声音。尽管在欧洲或以英语为主导的世界中,它们的场所和背景可能并不为人所熟知或理解,但这里的每一个案例都在当地以外产生了共鸣。其中一些因其令人震惊的价值而短暂出现在国际新闻中,无论是2020 - 2022年夏季从俄罗斯远东地区蔓延到阿拉斯加的大火,《欧亚人类学与考古学2020》,VOL. 59, no . 3-4, 167-176 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534
Introduction: Ecology Lessons: Community Solidarity, Indigenous Knowledge, Civic Society in Crisis
As Russia’s society has been wrenched by the war in Ukraine and civicpolitical divisions at home, one of its most critical problems, the environment, has been pushed aside. Yet ecological values and activism are more important than ever, as Russia’s citizens must contend with the exacerbation of natural resource destruction and climate crisis ramifications on an accelerated and unprecedented scale. The articles featured in this finale double issue of our journal were solicited well before the war began in February 2022, but most have been written and revised since, with each author feeling a sense of urgency and distress. What began as a project to highlight the ecology activist successes in a few high-profile cases illustrating civic society mobilization in Russia has instead moved to analyzing disaster zones in various degrees of devastation. What can we learn from the experiences of valiant ecology activists and besieged civic society leaders? How can Indigenous knowledge gleaned and practiced over centuries help in managing ecological and societal stresses? How can Russia’s urban scientific and rural Indigenous communities communicate productively with each other, especially when some scientists are Indigenous? How could state legal and policy mechanisms mitigate environmental destruction rather than abet it? These are some of the questions asked in this issue. The authors come from diverse backgrounds, Russian and non-Russian, rural and urban, scientific and political, activist and scholarly. Each article qualifies as anthropology in the best, broadest sense of the word. The authors are ethnographic in their descriptions, sensitive to human rights at many levels, and strive to accurately portray the voices of their interlocutors. Each case featured here resonates beyond the local, although their venues and contexts may not be well known or understood in the European or English-language-oriented world. Some have briefly appeared in the international news due to their shock value, whether massive fires that spread smoke from Far East Russia to Alaska in the summers of 2020–2022, ANTHROPOLOGY & ARCHEOLOGY OF EURASIA 2020, VOL. 59, NOS. 3–4, 167–176 https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2020.2139534
期刊介绍:
Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia presents scholarship from Russia, Siberia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia, the vast region that stretches from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Lake Baikal to the Bering Strait. Each thematic issue, with a substantive introduction to the topic by the editor, features expertly translated and annotated manuscripts, articles, and book excerpts reporting fieldwork from every part of the region and theoretical studies on topics of special interest.