从头开始:戈达尔的15节课,明信片游戏

IF 0.2 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
Michael Grace
{"title":"从头开始:戈达尔的15节课,明信片游戏","authors":"Michael Grace","doi":"10.1080/17411548.2022.2073775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study of Film Museums is shorter than the standard length for scholarly monographs. It could easily cover more. Whilst reading the text, I frequently found myself needing to go check online for additional information. This may on the one hand be a shortcoming as the details could have been in the book. But on the other hand, it could also be interpreted as a factor that confirms the book as sufficiently interesting to prompt further investigation. I give it the benefit of the doubt: it is a useful study that I wholeheartedly recommend. As a final aside, though, I do notice in this book a trend in the publishing of scholarly monographs that I have also noticed in recently published texts: no longer is there a bibliography at the end of the book. Rather, there are separate bibliographies at the end of each chapter. Besides the often-unnecessary repetitions, this practice is in breach of the style manuals’ standards for presenting scholarly monographs. Yet, it seems this is the new standard that profit-craving publishers impose: a sustained longer piece of writing is cut into manageable and ‘sellable’ chunks. As publishers ‘rule,’ this new standard will prevail. But it also spells out the end of the coherent treatise as an intellectual project.","PeriodicalId":42089,"journal":{"name":"Studies in European Cinema","volume":"20 1","pages":"233 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seeing from scratch: fifteen lessons with Godard, with the postcard game\",\"authors\":\"Michael Grace\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17411548.2022.2073775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Study of Film Museums is shorter than the standard length for scholarly monographs. It could easily cover more. Whilst reading the text, I frequently found myself needing to go check online for additional information. This may on the one hand be a shortcoming as the details could have been in the book. But on the other hand, it could also be interpreted as a factor that confirms the book as sufficiently interesting to prompt further investigation. I give it the benefit of the doubt: it is a useful study that I wholeheartedly recommend. As a final aside, though, I do notice in this book a trend in the publishing of scholarly monographs that I have also noticed in recently published texts: no longer is there a bibliography at the end of the book. Rather, there are separate bibliographies at the end of each chapter. Besides the often-unnecessary repetitions, this practice is in breach of the style manuals’ standards for presenting scholarly monographs. Yet, it seems this is the new standard that profit-craving publishers impose: a sustained longer piece of writing is cut into manageable and ‘sellable’ chunks. As publishers ‘rule,’ this new standard will prevail. But it also spells out the end of the coherent treatise as an intellectual project.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in European Cinema\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"233 - 235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in European Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2022.2073775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17411548.2022.2073775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《电影博物馆研究》比学术专著的标准篇幅要短。它可以很容易地覆盖更多。在阅读文本时,我经常发现自己需要上网查看更多信息。一方面,这可能是一个缺点,因为书中可能有细节。但另一方面,它也可以被解释为一个因素,证实这本书足够有趣,从而促使进一步的调查。我对此表示怀疑:这是一项有用的研究,我衷心推荐。不过,作为最后一句话,我在这本书中确实注意到了学术专著出版的趋势,我在最近出版的文本中也注意到了这一趋势:书的结尾不再有参考书目。相反,在每一章的末尾都有单独的参考书目。除了经常不必要的重复之外,这种做法还违反了风格手册对学术专著的标准。然而,这似乎是渴望利润的出版商强加的新标准:一篇持续更长的文章被切成可管理和“可销售”的大块。按照出版商的规定,这一新标准将占上风。但它也将连贯论文的结尾作为一个智力项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Seeing from scratch: fifteen lessons with Godard, with the postcard game
Study of Film Museums is shorter than the standard length for scholarly monographs. It could easily cover more. Whilst reading the text, I frequently found myself needing to go check online for additional information. This may on the one hand be a shortcoming as the details could have been in the book. But on the other hand, it could also be interpreted as a factor that confirms the book as sufficiently interesting to prompt further investigation. I give it the benefit of the doubt: it is a useful study that I wholeheartedly recommend. As a final aside, though, I do notice in this book a trend in the publishing of scholarly monographs that I have also noticed in recently published texts: no longer is there a bibliography at the end of the book. Rather, there are separate bibliographies at the end of each chapter. Besides the often-unnecessary repetitions, this practice is in breach of the style manuals’ standards for presenting scholarly monographs. Yet, it seems this is the new standard that profit-craving publishers impose: a sustained longer piece of writing is cut into manageable and ‘sellable’ chunks. As publishers ‘rule,’ this new standard will prevail. But it also spells out the end of the coherent treatise as an intellectual project.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in European Cinema
Studies in European Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信