与紧急护理服务相关的感知策略和求助行为:一项混合方法研究

J. Turnbull, G. McKenna, J. Prichard, A. Rogers, R. Crouch, A. Lennon, C. Pope
{"title":"与紧急护理服务相关的感知策略和求助行为:一项混合方法研究","authors":"J. Turnbull, G. McKenna, J. Prichard, A. Rogers, R. Crouch, A. Lennon, C. Pope","doi":"10.3310/HSDR07260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy has been focused on reducing unnecessary emergency department attendances by providing more responsive urgent care services and guiding patients to ‘the right place’. The variety of services has created a complex urgent care landscape for people to access and navigate.To describe how the public, providers and policy-makers define and make sense of urgent care; to explain how sense-making influences patients’ strategies and choices; to analyse patient ‘work’ in understanding, navigating and choosing urgent care; to explain urgent care utilisation; and to identify potentially modifiable factors in decision-making.Mixed-methods sequential design.Four counties in southern England coterminous with a NHS 111 provider area.A literature review of policy and research combined with citizens’ panels and serial qualitative interviews. Four citizens’ panels were conducted with the public, health-care professionals, commissioners and managers (n = 41). Three populations were sampled for interview: people aged ≥ 75 years, people aged 18–26 years and East European people. In total, 134 interviews were conducted. Analyses were integrated to develop a conceptual model of urgent care help-seeking.The literature review identified some consensus between policy and provider perspectives regarding the physiological factors that feature in conceptualisations of urgent care. However, the terms ‘urgent’ and ‘emergency’ lack specificity or consistency in meaning. Boundaries between urgent and emergency care are ill-defined. We constructed a typology that distinguishes three types of work that take place at both the individual and social network levels in relation to urgent care sense-making and help-seeking.Illness workinvolves interpretation and decision-making about the meaning, severity and management of physical symptoms and psychological states, and the assessment and management of possible risks. Help-seeking was guided bymoral work: the legitimation and sanctioning done by service users.Navigation workconcerned choosing and accessing services and relied on prior knowledge of what was available, accessible and acceptable. From these empirical data, we developed a model of urgent care sense-making and help-seeking behaviour that emphasises that work informs the interaction between what we think and feel about illness and the need to seek care (sense-making) and action – the decisions we take and how we use urgent care (help-seeking).The sample population of our three groups may not have adequately reflected a diverse range of views and experiences. The study enabled us to capture people’s views and self-reported service use rather than their actual behaviour.Much of the policy surrounding urgent and emergency care is predicated on the notion that ‘urgent’ sits neatly between emergency and routine; however, service users in particular struggle to distinguish urgent from emergency or routine care. Rather than focusing on individual sense-making, future work should attend to social and temporal contexts that have an impact on help-seeking (e.g. why people find it more difficult to manage pain at night), and how different social networks shape service use.A whole-systems approach considering integration across a wider network of partners is key to understanding the complex relationships between demand for and access to urgent care.This study is registered as UKCRN 32207.The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sense-making strategies and help-seeking behaviours associated with urgent care services: a mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"J. Turnbull, G. McKenna, J. Prichard, A. Rogers, R. Crouch, A. Lennon, C. Pope\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/HSDR07260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policy has been focused on reducing unnecessary emergency department attendances by providing more responsive urgent care services and guiding patients to ‘the right place’. The variety of services has created a complex urgent care landscape for people to access and navigate.To describe how the public, providers and policy-makers define and make sense of urgent care; to explain how sense-making influences patients’ strategies and choices; to analyse patient ‘work’ in understanding, navigating and choosing urgent care; to explain urgent care utilisation; and to identify potentially modifiable factors in decision-making.Mixed-methods sequential design.Four counties in southern England coterminous with a NHS 111 provider area.A literature review of policy and research combined with citizens’ panels and serial qualitative interviews. Four citizens’ panels were conducted with the public, health-care professionals, commissioners and managers (n = 41). Three populations were sampled for interview: people aged ≥ 75 years, people aged 18–26 years and East European people. In total, 134 interviews were conducted. Analyses were integrated to develop a conceptual model of urgent care help-seeking.The literature review identified some consensus between policy and provider perspectives regarding the physiological factors that feature in conceptualisations of urgent care. However, the terms ‘urgent’ and ‘emergency’ lack specificity or consistency in meaning. Boundaries between urgent and emergency care are ill-defined. We constructed a typology that distinguishes three types of work that take place at both the individual and social network levels in relation to urgent care sense-making and help-seeking.Illness workinvolves interpretation and decision-making about the meaning, severity and management of physical symptoms and psychological states, and the assessment and management of possible risks. Help-seeking was guided bymoral work: the legitimation and sanctioning done by service users.Navigation workconcerned choosing and accessing services and relied on prior knowledge of what was available, accessible and acceptable. From these empirical data, we developed a model of urgent care sense-making and help-seeking behaviour that emphasises that work informs the interaction between what we think and feel about illness and the need to seek care (sense-making) and action – the decisions we take and how we use urgent care (help-seeking).The sample population of our three groups may not have adequately reflected a diverse range of views and experiences. The study enabled us to capture people’s views and self-reported service use rather than their actual behaviour.Much of the policy surrounding urgent and emergency care is predicated on the notion that ‘urgent’ sits neatly between emergency and routine; however, service users in particular struggle to distinguish urgent from emergency or routine care. Rather than focusing on individual sense-making, future work should attend to social and temporal contexts that have an impact on help-seeking (e.g. why people find it more difficult to manage pain at night), and how different social networks shape service use.A whole-systems approach considering integration across a wider network of partners is key to understanding the complex relationships between demand for and access to urgent care.This study is registered as UKCRN 32207.The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR07260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/HSDR07260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

政策的重点是通过提供更及时的紧急护理服务和引导病人到“正确的地方”,减少不必要的急诊科就诊人数。各种各样的服务创造了一个复杂的紧急护理景观,供人们访问和导航。描述公众、提供者和决策者如何定义和理解紧急护理;解释理解如何影响患者的策略和选择;分析患者在理解、导航和选择紧急护理方面的“工作”;解释紧急护理的使用情况;并找出决策过程中可能改变的因素。混合方法顺序设计。英格兰南部的四个县与NHS 111提供区域相连。结合公民小组和系列定性访谈,对政策和研究进行文献回顾。与公众、保健专业人员、专员和管理人员进行了四次公民小组讨论(n = 41)。访谈对象为年龄≥75岁的人群、18-26岁的人群和东欧人群。总共进行了134次访谈。综合分析,形成紧急护理求助的概念模型。文献综述确定了一些共识之间的政策和提供者的观点关于生理因素的特征,在概念上的紧急护理。然而,“urgent”和“emergency”这两个词在意义上缺乏特异性或一致性。紧急和紧急护理之间的界限不明确。我们构建了一个类型学来区分发生在个人和社会网络层面的三种类型的工作,这些工作与紧急护理意义的制定和寻求帮助有关。疾病工作涉及对身体症状和心理状态的含义、严重程度和管理的解释和决策,以及对可能风险的评估和管理。寻求帮助是由道德工作引导的:服务使用者所做的合法化和批准。导航工作涉及选择和访问服务,并依赖于对可用、可访问和可接受的内容的先验知识。从这些经验数据中,我们开发了一个紧急护理意义制定和寻求帮助行为的模型,强调工作通知了我们对疾病的想法和感受与寻求护理的需要(意义制定)和行动之间的相互作用-我们做出的决定以及我们如何使用紧急护理(寻求帮助)。我们三个小组的样本人口可能没有充分反映出各种各样的观点和经验。这项研究使我们能够捕捉到人们的观点和自我报告的服务使用情况,而不是他们的实际行为。围绕紧急和紧急护理的许多政策都是基于这样一种观念,即“紧急”恰好位于紧急和日常之间;然而,服务使用者尤其难以区分紧急护理、紧急护理或常规护理。未来的工作应该关注对寻求帮助有影响的社会和时间背景(例如,为什么人们发现夜间疼痛更难以控制),以及不同的社交网络如何影响服务的使用,而不是关注个人意义的形成。考虑到更广泛的合作伙伴网络整合的全系统方法是理解紧急护理需求和获得之间复杂关系的关键。本研究注册号为UKCRN 32207。国家卫生研究所卫生服务和提供研究方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sense-making strategies and help-seeking behaviours associated with urgent care services: a mixed-methods study
Policy has been focused on reducing unnecessary emergency department attendances by providing more responsive urgent care services and guiding patients to ‘the right place’. The variety of services has created a complex urgent care landscape for people to access and navigate.To describe how the public, providers and policy-makers define and make sense of urgent care; to explain how sense-making influences patients’ strategies and choices; to analyse patient ‘work’ in understanding, navigating and choosing urgent care; to explain urgent care utilisation; and to identify potentially modifiable factors in decision-making.Mixed-methods sequential design.Four counties in southern England coterminous with a NHS 111 provider area.A literature review of policy and research combined with citizens’ panels and serial qualitative interviews. Four citizens’ panels were conducted with the public, health-care professionals, commissioners and managers (n = 41). Three populations were sampled for interview: people aged ≥ 75 years, people aged 18–26 years and East European people. In total, 134 interviews were conducted. Analyses were integrated to develop a conceptual model of urgent care help-seeking.The literature review identified some consensus between policy and provider perspectives regarding the physiological factors that feature in conceptualisations of urgent care. However, the terms ‘urgent’ and ‘emergency’ lack specificity or consistency in meaning. Boundaries between urgent and emergency care are ill-defined. We constructed a typology that distinguishes three types of work that take place at both the individual and social network levels in relation to urgent care sense-making and help-seeking.Illness workinvolves interpretation and decision-making about the meaning, severity and management of physical symptoms and psychological states, and the assessment and management of possible risks. Help-seeking was guided bymoral work: the legitimation and sanctioning done by service users.Navigation workconcerned choosing and accessing services and relied on prior knowledge of what was available, accessible and acceptable. From these empirical data, we developed a model of urgent care sense-making and help-seeking behaviour that emphasises that work informs the interaction between what we think and feel about illness and the need to seek care (sense-making) and action – the decisions we take and how we use urgent care (help-seeking).The sample population of our three groups may not have adequately reflected a diverse range of views and experiences. The study enabled us to capture people’s views and self-reported service use rather than their actual behaviour.Much of the policy surrounding urgent and emergency care is predicated on the notion that ‘urgent’ sits neatly between emergency and routine; however, service users in particular struggle to distinguish urgent from emergency or routine care. Rather than focusing on individual sense-making, future work should attend to social and temporal contexts that have an impact on help-seeking (e.g. why people find it more difficult to manage pain at night), and how different social networks shape service use.A whole-systems approach considering integration across a wider network of partners is key to understanding the complex relationships between demand for and access to urgent care.This study is registered as UKCRN 32207.The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信