超声与透视引导下胃下神经丛阻滞治疗癌膀胱:一项随机对照试验

A. Khalil, I. H. Mahmoud, D. Abbas, M. M. Mostafa, A. S. Idris, Khaled Abdel Hamed Mostafa
{"title":"超声与透视引导下胃下神经丛阻滞治疗癌膀胱:一项随机对照试验","authors":"A. Khalil, I. H. Mahmoud, D. Abbas, M. M. Mostafa, A. S. Idris, Khaled Abdel Hamed Mostafa","doi":"10.3889/oamjms.2023.8581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced bladder cancer may suffer severe pelvic pain unresponsive to standard pharmacological therapy.\nAIM: This study assessed the feasibility, efficacy of ultrasoundguided (USG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) in bladder cancer pain management.\nMETHODS: This randomized controlled study included 60 patients undergoing SHPB to manage pain in stages 3 and 4 bladder cancer patients from December 2020 to June 2021. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group Fluoro (n = 30) underwent FG-SHPB, while Group US (n = 30) underwent US-SHPB. The patients were assessed after 1 day and 1 and 3 months regarding pain intensity using visual analog score (VAS), daily morphine consumption, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) using the Short Form Health Survey-36.\nRESULTS: The procedure failed in 2 patients in each group. The procedure was significantly lengthier in the Fluor group than the US group (p < 0.001). VAS scores decreased significantly in the two groups after 1 and 3 months and were significantly in US-SHBP after 3 months. Morphine consumption decreased significantly, and functional capacity and QoL improved significantly in both groups up to 3 months. The two groups were comparable in morphine consumption, functional capacity, and QoL. Position discomfort and back pain were more common in Fluor Group.\nCONCLUSION: USG SHPB is a feasible, safe, and effective analgesic procedure in patients with advanced bladder cancer suffering from severe pelvic pain. It is superior to the FG transdiscal approach regarding the duration of pain relief and improvement of functional capacity in addition to avoidance of position discomfort and back pain.\nREGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov (ID NCT05083702).","PeriodicalId":19562,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalil, I. H. Mahmoud, D. Abbas, M. M. Mostafa, A. S. Idris, Khaled Abdel Hamed Mostafa\",\"doi\":\"10.3889/oamjms.2023.8581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced bladder cancer may suffer severe pelvic pain unresponsive to standard pharmacological therapy.\\nAIM: This study assessed the feasibility, efficacy of ultrasoundguided (USG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) in bladder cancer pain management.\\nMETHODS: This randomized controlled study included 60 patients undergoing SHPB to manage pain in stages 3 and 4 bladder cancer patients from December 2020 to June 2021. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group Fluoro (n = 30) underwent FG-SHPB, while Group US (n = 30) underwent US-SHPB. The patients were assessed after 1 day and 1 and 3 months regarding pain intensity using visual analog score (VAS), daily morphine consumption, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) using the Short Form Health Survey-36.\\nRESULTS: The procedure failed in 2 patients in each group. The procedure was significantly lengthier in the Fluor group than the US group (p < 0.001). VAS scores decreased significantly in the two groups after 1 and 3 months and were significantly in US-SHBP after 3 months. Morphine consumption decreased significantly, and functional capacity and QoL improved significantly in both groups up to 3 months. The two groups were comparable in morphine consumption, functional capacity, and QoL. Position discomfort and back pain were more common in Fluor Group.\\nCONCLUSION: USG SHPB is a feasible, safe, and effective analgesic procedure in patients with advanced bladder cancer suffering from severe pelvic pain. It is superior to the FG transdiscal approach regarding the duration of pain relief and improvement of functional capacity in addition to avoidance of position discomfort and back pain.\\nREGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov (ID NCT05083702).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.8581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.8581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:晚期膀胱癌患者可能会出现严重的骨盆疼痛,对标准药物治疗无反应。目的:评价超声引导下(USG)与透视引导下(FG)胃下神经丛阻滞(SHPB)治疗膀胱癌疼痛的可行性和疗效。方法:这项随机对照研究包括60例接受SHPB治疗的3期和4期膀胱癌患者,时间为2020年12月至2021年6月。他们被随机分成两组。氟组(n = 30)行FG-SHPB, US组(n = 30)行US- shpb。术后1天、1个月和3个月分别用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、每日吗啡用量、功能能力和生活质量(QoL)评估患者的疼痛强度。结果:两组均有2例手术失败。Fluor组的手术时间明显长于US组(p < 0.001)。两组患者在1个月和3个月后VAS评分显著下降,3个月后US-SHBP评分显著下降。吗啡用量明显减少,3个月时两组功能能力和生活质量均明显改善。两组吗啡用量、功能容量和生活质量具有可比性。氟组体位不适和背部疼痛多见。结论:USG SHPB对晚期膀胱癌伴严重盆腔疼痛患者是一种可行、安全、有效的镇痛方法。除了避免体位不适和背部疼痛外,它在缓解疼痛的持续时间和改善功能能力方面优于FG经椎间盘入路。注册:Clinical Trials.gov(编号NCT05083702)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block in Cancer Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced bladder cancer may suffer severe pelvic pain unresponsive to standard pharmacological therapy. AIM: This study assessed the feasibility, efficacy of ultrasoundguided (USG) versus fluoroscopy-guided (FG) superior hypogastric plexus block (SHPB) in bladder cancer pain management. METHODS: This randomized controlled study included 60 patients undergoing SHPB to manage pain in stages 3 and 4 bladder cancer patients from December 2020 to June 2021. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group Fluoro (n = 30) underwent FG-SHPB, while Group US (n = 30) underwent US-SHPB. The patients were assessed after 1 day and 1 and 3 months regarding pain intensity using visual analog score (VAS), daily morphine consumption, functional capacity, and quality of life (QoL) using the Short Form Health Survey-36. RESULTS: The procedure failed in 2 patients in each group. The procedure was significantly lengthier in the Fluor group than the US group (p < 0.001). VAS scores decreased significantly in the two groups after 1 and 3 months and were significantly in US-SHBP after 3 months. Morphine consumption decreased significantly, and functional capacity and QoL improved significantly in both groups up to 3 months. The two groups were comparable in morphine consumption, functional capacity, and QoL. Position discomfort and back pain were more common in Fluor Group. CONCLUSION: USG SHPB is a feasible, safe, and effective analgesic procedure in patients with advanced bladder cancer suffering from severe pelvic pain. It is superior to the FG transdiscal approach regarding the duration of pain relief and improvement of functional capacity in addition to avoidance of position discomfort and back pain. REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov (ID NCT05083702).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1225
期刊介绍: Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) [formerly known as Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences] is a top-tier open access medical science journal published by the ID Design 2012/DOOEL Skopje, Rajko Zhinzifov No 48, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia. OAMJMS is an international, modern, general medical journal covering all areas in the medical sciences, from basic studies to large clinical trials and cost-effectiveness analyses. We publish mostly human studies that substantially enhance our understanding of disease epidemiology, etiology, and physiology; the development of prognostic and diagnostic technologies; trials that test the efficacy of specific interventions and those that compare different treatments; and systematic reviews. We aim to promote translation of basic research into clinical investigation, and of clinical evidence into practice. We publish occasional studies in animal models when they report outstanding research findings that are highly clinically relevant. Our audience is the international medical community as well as educators, policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and interested members of the public around the world. OAMJMS is published quarterly online version. The Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences (OAMJMS) publishes Medical Informatics, Basic Science, Clinical Science, Case Report, Brief Communication, Public Health, Public Policy, and Review Article from all fields of medicine and related fields. This journal also publishes, continuously or occasionally, the bibliographies of the members of the Society, medical history, medical publications, thesis abstracts, book reviews, reports on meetings, i­n­formation on future meetings, important events and dates, and various headings which contribute to the development of the corresponding scientific field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信