“在一个没有尽头的阶梯上挣扎”:神正论及其给黑人解放神学带来的失败

IF 0.3 0 RELIGION
Jamall A. Calloway
{"title":"“在一个没有尽头的阶梯上挣扎”:神正论及其给黑人解放神学带来的失败","authors":"Jamall A. Calloway","doi":"10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.","PeriodicalId":42729,"journal":{"name":"BLACK THEOLOGY","volume":"18 1","pages":"223 - 245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“To Struggle Up a Never-Ending Stair”: Theodicy and the Failure It Gifts to Black Liberation Theology\",\"authors\":\"Jamall A. Calloway\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK THEOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2020.1826652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

对威廉·r·琼斯的《上帝是白人种族主义者吗?》《黑人神学的序曲》(1973)是黑人解放神学文献中的一部。然而,琼斯工作的建设性可能性却没有被理论化。分析琼斯和詹姆斯·h·科恩之间的神学辩论为我们提供了必要的材料,以便构建一种以琼斯的神正论假设为起点的黑人神学。我认为神正论是黑人解放神学的一个有用的“控制范畴”,但这只是——我在这里追随康德——它如何瓦解了相信上帝/解放的理性论证的结果。正是这种失败使得它成为理解黑人解放神学基础上的“黑人信仰”轮廓的重要途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“To Struggle Up a Never-Ending Stair”: Theodicy and the Failure It Gifts to Black Liberation Theology
ABSTRACT There has been much criticism – and an overall unfortunate dismissal – of William R. Jones' Is God A White Racist?: A Preamble to Black Theology (1973) in the literature of Black liberation theology. What is undertheorized, however, is the constructive possibilities of Jones' work. Analyzing the theological debate between Jones and James H. Cone provides us with the necessary material in order to construct a Black theology that commences with the assumptions of Jones' theodicy. I argue that theodicy is a useful “controlling category” for Black liberation theology, but only – and here I am following Kant – as a result of how its collapses rational arguments for believing in God/liberation. And it is precisely this failure that makes it profoundly useful as an avenue into understanding the contours of “Black faith” that undergirds Black liberation theology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK THEOLOGY
BLACK THEOLOGY RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信