{"title":"二部图和二部Ramanujan图的Size-Ramsey数","authors":"R. Javadi, Farideh Khoeini","doi":"10.22108/TOC.2019.111317.1573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a graph $ G $, a graph $ F $ is said to be Ramsey for $ G $ if in every edge coloring of $F$ with two colors, there exists a monochromatic copy of $G$. The minimum number of edges of a graph $ F $ which is Ramsey for $ G $ is called the size-Ramsey number of $G$ and is denoted by $hat{r}(G)$. In 1983, Beck gave a linear upper bound (in terms of $n$) for $hat{r}(P_{n})$, where $ P_n $ is a path on $ n $ vertices, giving a positive answer to a question of ErdH{o}s. After that, different approaches were attempted by several authors to reduce the upper bound for $hat{r}(P_n)$ for sufficiently large $n$ and most of these approaches are based on the classic models of random graphs. Also, Haxell and Kohayakama in 1994 proved that the size Ramsey number of the cycle $ C_n $ is linear in terms $ n $, however the Szemeredi's regularity lemma is used in their proof and so no specific constant coefficient is provided. Here, we provide a method to obtain an upper bound for the size Ramsey number of a graph using good expander graphs such as Ramanujan graphs. In particular, we give an alternative proof for the linearity of the size Ramsey number of paths and cycles. Our method has two privileges in compare to the previous ones. Firstly, it proves the upper bound for every positive integer $n$ in comparison to the random graph methods which needs $ n $ to be sufficiently large. Also, due to the recent explicit constructions for bipartite Ramanujan graphs by Marcus, Spielman and Srivastava, we can constructively find the graphs with small sizes which are Ramsey for a given graph. We also obtain some results about the bipartite Ramsey numbers.","PeriodicalId":43837,"journal":{"name":"Transactions on Combinatorics","volume":"8 1","pages":"45-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size Ramsey number of bipartite graphs and bipartite Ramanujan graphs\",\"authors\":\"R. Javadi, Farideh Khoeini\",\"doi\":\"10.22108/TOC.2019.111317.1573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given a graph $ G $, a graph $ F $ is said to be Ramsey for $ G $ if in every edge coloring of $F$ with two colors, there exists a monochromatic copy of $G$. The minimum number of edges of a graph $ F $ which is Ramsey for $ G $ is called the size-Ramsey number of $G$ and is denoted by $hat{r}(G)$. In 1983, Beck gave a linear upper bound (in terms of $n$) for $hat{r}(P_{n})$, where $ P_n $ is a path on $ n $ vertices, giving a positive answer to a question of ErdH{o}s. After that, different approaches were attempted by several authors to reduce the upper bound for $hat{r}(P_n)$ for sufficiently large $n$ and most of these approaches are based on the classic models of random graphs. Also, Haxell and Kohayakama in 1994 proved that the size Ramsey number of the cycle $ C_n $ is linear in terms $ n $, however the Szemeredi's regularity lemma is used in their proof and so no specific constant coefficient is provided. Here, we provide a method to obtain an upper bound for the size Ramsey number of a graph using good expander graphs such as Ramanujan graphs. In particular, we give an alternative proof for the linearity of the size Ramsey number of paths and cycles. Our method has two privileges in compare to the previous ones. Firstly, it proves the upper bound for every positive integer $n$ in comparison to the random graph methods which needs $ n $ to be sufficiently large. Also, due to the recent explicit constructions for bipartite Ramanujan graphs by Marcus, Spielman and Srivastava, we can constructively find the graphs with small sizes which are Ramsey for a given graph. We also obtain some results about the bipartite Ramsey numbers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions on Combinatorics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"45-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions on Combinatorics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22108/TOC.2019.111317.1573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions on Combinatorics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22108/TOC.2019.111317.1573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
给定一个图$G$,如果在$F$的每一个有两种颜色的边着色中,存在$G$的一个单色副本,则称$F$是$G$的Ramsey。图$ F $的最小边数是$G$的拉姆齐数,称为$G$的大小拉姆齐数,用$hat{r}(G)$表示。1983年,Beck给出了$hat{r}(P_{n})$的线性上界(以$n$表示),其中$ P_n $是$n$个顶点上的路径,给出了ErdH{o}s问题的正答案。之后,一些作者尝试了不同的方法来降低$hat{r}(P_n)$的上界,对于足够大的$n$,这些方法大多是基于经典的随机图模型。1994年Haxell和Kohayakama也证明了循环C_n $的大小Ramsey数在n $项上是线性的,但是在他们的证明中使用了Szemeredi的正则性引理,因此没有给出具体的常系数。在这里,我们提供了一种方法来获得一个图的大小拉姆齐数的上界使用良好的展开图,如拉马努金图。特别地,我们给出了路径和环的拉姆齐数大小的线性的另一种证明。与前面的方法相比,我们的方法有两个特权。首先,与随机图方法相比,它证明了每个正整数$n$的上界,而随机图方法需要$n$足够大。此外,由于Marcus, Spielman和Srivastava最近对二部Ramanujan图的显式构造,我们可以建设性地找到给定图的Ramsey小尺寸图。我们还得到了关于二部拉姆齐数的一些结果。
Size Ramsey number of bipartite graphs and bipartite Ramanujan graphs
Given a graph $ G $, a graph $ F $ is said to be Ramsey for $ G $ if in every edge coloring of $F$ with two colors, there exists a monochromatic copy of $G$. The minimum number of edges of a graph $ F $ which is Ramsey for $ G $ is called the size-Ramsey number of $G$ and is denoted by $hat{r}(G)$. In 1983, Beck gave a linear upper bound (in terms of $n$) for $hat{r}(P_{n})$, where $ P_n $ is a path on $ n $ vertices, giving a positive answer to a question of ErdH{o}s. After that, different approaches were attempted by several authors to reduce the upper bound for $hat{r}(P_n)$ for sufficiently large $n$ and most of these approaches are based on the classic models of random graphs. Also, Haxell and Kohayakama in 1994 proved that the size Ramsey number of the cycle $ C_n $ is linear in terms $ n $, however the Szemeredi's regularity lemma is used in their proof and so no specific constant coefficient is provided. Here, we provide a method to obtain an upper bound for the size Ramsey number of a graph using good expander graphs such as Ramanujan graphs. In particular, we give an alternative proof for the linearity of the size Ramsey number of paths and cycles. Our method has two privileges in compare to the previous ones. Firstly, it proves the upper bound for every positive integer $n$ in comparison to the random graph methods which needs $ n $ to be sufficiently large. Also, due to the recent explicit constructions for bipartite Ramanujan graphs by Marcus, Spielman and Srivastava, we can constructively find the graphs with small sizes which are Ramsey for a given graph. We also obtain some results about the bipartite Ramsey numbers.