仅根据广泛使用的纸片扩散试验评估糖肽类抗生素对肠球菌分离株的易感性报告中的错误

IF 0.2 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vikas Saini, N. Goyal, N. Singh, Meenakshi Goswami
{"title":"仅根据广泛使用的纸片扩散试验评估糖肽类抗生素对肠球菌分离株的易感性报告中的错误","authors":"Vikas Saini, N. Goyal, N. Singh, Meenakshi Goswami","doi":"10.4081/hls.2022.10806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In resource limited settings, very often susceptibility reports glycopeptide antibiotics are released only on the basis of disk diffusion test. Determination of MIC by either E-strips or microbroth dilution tests can be of paramount importance in checking the errors that may have incurred with the singular use of disk diffusion tests. Distribution of errors in Vancomycin and Teicoplanin susceptibility reporting by disk diffusion test was evaluated in comparison with MIC determination with reference method of E-strip. A total of 40 isolates of Enterococcus species were obtained during the study period. In vancomycin susceptibility reporting, very major errors, major errors and minor errors were observed in 33.3%, 5.4% and 5% instances respectively. For teicoplanin, major errors were observed in 5.3% of instances. E test can be used in conjunction with disk diffusion where resources are limited. We have observed that by using a combination of both disk diffusion and MIC determination by E-strip methods for glycopeptide antibiotics, a majority of reporting errors can be addressed.","PeriodicalId":30412,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of errors during susceptibility reporting of glycopeptide antibiotics for enterococcal isolates on sole basis of widely used disk diffusion test\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Saini, N. Goyal, N. Singh, Meenakshi Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/hls.2022.10806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In resource limited settings, very often susceptibility reports glycopeptide antibiotics are released only on the basis of disk diffusion test. Determination of MIC by either E-strips or microbroth dilution tests can be of paramount importance in checking the errors that may have incurred with the singular use of disk diffusion tests. Distribution of errors in Vancomycin and Teicoplanin susceptibility reporting by disk diffusion test was evaluated in comparison with MIC determination with reference method of E-strip. A total of 40 isolates of Enterococcus species were obtained during the study period. In vancomycin susceptibility reporting, very major errors, major errors and minor errors were observed in 33.3%, 5.4% and 5% instances respectively. For teicoplanin, major errors were observed in 5.3% of instances. E test can be used in conjunction with disk diffusion where resources are limited. We have observed that by using a combination of both disk diffusion and MIC determination by E-strip methods for glycopeptide antibiotics, a majority of reporting errors can be addressed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2022.10806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare in Lowresource Settings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/hls.2022.10806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在资源有限的情况下,通常药敏报告仅根据磁盘扩散试验发布糖肽抗生素。用e -试纸或微肉汤稀释试验测定MIC,对于检查单一使用纸片扩散试验可能产生的误差至关重要。比较纸片扩散试验报告万古霉素和替柯planin药敏的误差分布,并与参比法MIC测定进行比较。研究期间共分离出40株肠球菌。万古霉素药敏报告中,非常严重错误、严重错误和轻微错误分别占33.3%、5.4%和5%。对于替柯普兰,5.3%的病例出现严重错误。在资源有限的情况下,E测试可以与磁盘扩散结合使用。我们观察到,结合使用纸片扩散法和e条法MIC测定糖肽类抗生素,可以解决大多数报告错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of errors during susceptibility reporting of glycopeptide antibiotics for enterococcal isolates on sole basis of widely used disk diffusion test
In resource limited settings, very often susceptibility reports glycopeptide antibiotics are released only on the basis of disk diffusion test. Determination of MIC by either E-strips or microbroth dilution tests can be of paramount importance in checking the errors that may have incurred with the singular use of disk diffusion tests. Distribution of errors in Vancomycin and Teicoplanin susceptibility reporting by disk diffusion test was evaluated in comparison with MIC determination with reference method of E-strip. A total of 40 isolates of Enterococcus species were obtained during the study period. In vancomycin susceptibility reporting, very major errors, major errors and minor errors were observed in 33.3%, 5.4% and 5% instances respectively. For teicoplanin, major errors were observed in 5.3% of instances. E test can be used in conjunction with disk diffusion where resources are limited. We have observed that by using a combination of both disk diffusion and MIC determination by E-strip methods for glycopeptide antibiotics, a majority of reporting errors can be addressed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信