苹果加工农工废料中熊果酸和齐墩果酸定量测定分析方法的测量不确定度评定

IF 0.2 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
I. Rubashvili, Mzia Tsitsagi, K. Ebralidze
{"title":"苹果加工农工废料中熊果酸和齐墩果酸定量测定分析方法的测量不确定度评定","authors":"I. Rubashvili, Mzia Tsitsagi, K. Ebralidze","doi":"10.52571/ptq.v19.n42.2022_06_rubashvili_pgs_60_74.pdf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Apple pomace represents a low-cost and rich source of bioactive compounds with valuable properties - ursolic acid (UA) and oleanolic acid (OA). Due to the wide range of applications in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries, these compounds have a high commercial value, and possessing a suitable analytical method with measurement uncertainty is of great significance and practicability. Aim: The purpose of the present work was to estimate detailed measurement uncertainty for the validated HPLC method combined with the extraction procedure for the determination of UA and OA in apple pomace. Methods: The chromatographic analysis using LC-20AD Prominence Shimadzu System and ultrasound-assisted extraction using the ultrasonic bath DW-5200DTS were performed to obtain and determine UA and OA in apple pomace. The process of measurement uncertainty evaluation was performed by the Ishikawa diagram and a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches. Results: The content of UA and OA (mg/g) in apple pomace with the value of the expanded uncertainty was calculated, which is 7.06 ± 0.647 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%) and 4.70 ± 0.422 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%), respectively. Six sources of all the contributors of uncertainties were observed that affected the measurement. Discussion: The A-type standard uncertainty value was 3 times less than the B-type standard uncertainty for both analytes. The results show that B-type standard uncertainty is a major contributor, and the value of the expanded uncertainty of the validated method will not change from test to test in the same laboratory conditions. Conclusions: The methodology described in this work explains well the details and practical aspects of the hybrid approach using the method validation data and proposes step-by-step instructions to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the quantitative method.","PeriodicalId":45103,"journal":{"name":"Periodico Tche Quimica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF URSOLIC AND OLEANOLIC ACIDS IN APPLE PROCESSING AGROINDUSTRIAL WASTE MATERIAL\",\"authors\":\"I. Rubashvili, Mzia Tsitsagi, K. Ebralidze\",\"doi\":\"10.52571/ptq.v19.n42.2022_06_rubashvili_pgs_60_74.pdf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Apple pomace represents a low-cost and rich source of bioactive compounds with valuable properties - ursolic acid (UA) and oleanolic acid (OA). Due to the wide range of applications in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries, these compounds have a high commercial value, and possessing a suitable analytical method with measurement uncertainty is of great significance and practicability. Aim: The purpose of the present work was to estimate detailed measurement uncertainty for the validated HPLC method combined with the extraction procedure for the determination of UA and OA in apple pomace. Methods: The chromatographic analysis using LC-20AD Prominence Shimadzu System and ultrasound-assisted extraction using the ultrasonic bath DW-5200DTS were performed to obtain and determine UA and OA in apple pomace. The process of measurement uncertainty evaluation was performed by the Ishikawa diagram and a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches. Results: The content of UA and OA (mg/g) in apple pomace with the value of the expanded uncertainty was calculated, which is 7.06 ± 0.647 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%) and 4.70 ± 0.422 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%), respectively. Six sources of all the contributors of uncertainties were observed that affected the measurement. Discussion: The A-type standard uncertainty value was 3 times less than the B-type standard uncertainty for both analytes. The results show that B-type standard uncertainty is a major contributor, and the value of the expanded uncertainty of the validated method will not change from test to test in the same laboratory conditions. Conclusions: The methodology described in this work explains well the details and practical aspects of the hybrid approach using the method validation data and proposes step-by-step instructions to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the quantitative method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Periodico Tche Quimica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Periodico Tche Quimica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v19.n42.2022_06_rubashvili_pgs_60_74.pdf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodico Tche Quimica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52571/ptq.v19.n42.2022_06_rubashvili_pgs_60_74.pdf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:苹果渣是一种低成本、丰富的具有宝贵性质的生物活性化合物来源——熊果酸(UA)和齐墩果酸(OA)。由于这些化合物在制药和营养品工业中的广泛应用,具有很高的商业价值,拥有一种合适的测量不确定度的分析方法具有重要的意义和实用性。目的:本工作的目的是评估经验证的HPLC方法结合提取程序测定苹果渣中UA和OA的详细测量不确定度。方法:采用LC-20AD Prominence Shimadzu系统进行色谱分析,采用DW-5200DTS超声辅助提取法测定苹果渣中UA和OA。测量不确定度评估过程采用石川图和自下而上和自上而下方法相结合的方法。结果:用扩展不确定度值计算出苹果渣中UA和OA的含量(mg/g),分别为7.06±0.647 mg/g(k=1.96;P=95%)和4.70±0.422 mg/g(k=1.96;P=0.05%)。观察到影响测量的所有不确定性因素的六个来源。讨论:两种分析物的A型标准不确定度值都是B型标准不确定性的3倍。结果表明,B型标准不确定度是一个主要因素,在相同的实验室条件下,验证方法的扩展不确定度值不会随测试而变化。结论:本工作中描述的方法利用方法验证数据很好地解释了混合方法的细节和实际方面,并提出了评估定量方法测量不确定度的分步说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF URSOLIC AND OLEANOLIC ACIDS IN APPLE PROCESSING AGROINDUSTRIAL WASTE MATERIAL
Background: Apple pomace represents a low-cost and rich source of bioactive compounds with valuable properties - ursolic acid (UA) and oleanolic acid (OA). Due to the wide range of applications in pharmaceutical and nutraceutical industries, these compounds have a high commercial value, and possessing a suitable analytical method with measurement uncertainty is of great significance and practicability. Aim: The purpose of the present work was to estimate detailed measurement uncertainty for the validated HPLC method combined with the extraction procedure for the determination of UA and OA in apple pomace. Methods: The chromatographic analysis using LC-20AD Prominence Shimadzu System and ultrasound-assisted extraction using the ultrasonic bath DW-5200DTS were performed to obtain and determine UA and OA in apple pomace. The process of measurement uncertainty evaluation was performed by the Ishikawa diagram and a combination of bottom-up and top-down approaches. Results: The content of UA and OA (mg/g) in apple pomace with the value of the expanded uncertainty was calculated, which is 7.06 ± 0.647 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%) and 4.70 ± 0.422 mg/g (k=1.96; P=95%), respectively. Six sources of all the contributors of uncertainties were observed that affected the measurement. Discussion: The A-type standard uncertainty value was 3 times less than the B-type standard uncertainty for both analytes. The results show that B-type standard uncertainty is a major contributor, and the value of the expanded uncertainty of the validated method will not change from test to test in the same laboratory conditions. Conclusions: The methodology described in this work explains well the details and practical aspects of the hybrid approach using the method validation data and proposes step-by-step instructions to evaluate the measurement uncertainty of the quantitative method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Periodico Tche Quimica
Periodico Tche Quimica CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, short communications (scientific publications), book reviews, forum articles, announcements or letters as well as interviews. Researchers from all countries are invited to publish on its pages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信