{"title":"英美关系中的格里·亚当斯签证","authors":"T. Lynch","doi":"10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.","PeriodicalId":39181,"journal":{"name":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","volume":" ","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gerry Adams Visa in Anglo-American Relations\",\"authors\":\"T. Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
摘要:本文认为,首先,1994年的格里·亚当斯签证令英国外交官大吃一惊,他们无力反击克林顿总统突如其来的外交倡议。其次,它认为英国官员默认了美国调停的结果,尽管他们反对这种方式。这并不是因为亚当斯特别邪恶,而是因为他的签证显示了他们在一个被认为比其他任何首都都更亲英的首都的影响力有限。本文是基于作者进行的研究,并在“地盘战争:克林顿政府和北爱尔兰”,博士论文,波士顿学院(美国),2003年提出。作者是英国莱斯特大学(University of Leicester)美国政治与外交政策讲师。
Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.