英美关系中的格里·亚当斯签证

Q4 Social Sciences
T. Lynch
{"title":"英美关系中的格里·亚当斯签证","authors":"T. Lynch","doi":"10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.","PeriodicalId":39181,"journal":{"name":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","volume":" ","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gerry Adams Visa in Anglo-American Relations\",\"authors\":\"T. Lynch\",\"doi\":\"10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Studies in International Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Studies in International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3318/IRISSTUDINTEAFFA.2018.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:本文认为,首先,1994年的格里·亚当斯签证令英国外交官大吃一惊,他们无力反击克林顿总统突如其来的外交倡议。其次,它认为英国官员默认了美国调停的结果,尽管他们反对这种方式。这并不是因为亚当斯特别邪恶,而是因为他的签证显示了他们在一个被认为比其他任何首都都更亲英的首都的影响力有限。本文是基于作者进行的研究,并在“地盘战争:克林顿政府和北爱尔兰”,博士论文,波士顿学院(美国),2003年提出。作者是英国莱斯特大学(University of Leicester)美国政治与外交政策讲师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Gerry Adams Visa in Anglo-American Relations
Abstract:This article argues, firstly, that British diplomats were so taken aback by the Gerry Adams visa in 1994 they were incapable of countering President Clinton's sudden diplomatic initiative. Secondly, it argues that British officials tacitly welcomed the ends of American intercession, though they resisted the means. This was not because Adams was uniquely wicked but because his visa showed the limitations of their influence in a capital city supposedly more pro-British than any other.This paper is based on research conducted by the author and presented in ‘Turf war: the Clinton administration and Northern Ireland’, PhD dissertation, Boston College (USA), 2003. The author is a lecturer in American politics and foreign policy at the University of Leicester, England.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Irish Studies in International Affairs
Irish Studies in International Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信