四种不同精加工和抛光系统对树脂复合材料的影响:表面粗糙度和保光性评价。

Q3 Medicine
Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, G. Orilisi, M. Procaccini, S. Grandini, A. Putignano, G. Orsini
{"title":"四种不同精加工和抛光系统对树脂复合材料的影响:表面粗糙度和保光性评价。","authors":"Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, G. Orilisi, M. Procaccini, S. Grandini, A. Putignano, G. Orsini","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFinishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.\n\n\nMETHODS\nTwelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.\n\n\nRESULTS\nRegarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.","PeriodicalId":18742,"journal":{"name":"Minerva stomatologica","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Tosco, Riccardo Monterubbianesi, G. Orilisi, M. Procaccini, S. Grandini, A. Putignano, G. Orsini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nFinishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nTwelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nRegarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva stomatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva stomatologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4970.19.04310-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景修整和抛光程序对实现直接修复的最佳美学效果起着至关重要的作用。许多制造商为临床医生提供不同的精加工和抛光系统。本研究旨在考察四种不同的精加工和抛光系统对一种树脂复合材料表面粗糙度、光泽度和形态的影响。方法制备Filtek XTE Supreme(3M ESPE)椎间盘,并根据不同的精加工和抛光系统分为4组(n=3):第1组(GP1)Sof Lex超薄XT椎间盘;第二组(GP2)Sof-Lex粗黑色圆盘,多槽钻,Sof-LexDiamond Spirals抛光系统;第三组(GP3)Sof-Lex粗黑色圆盘,多槽钻,Sof-LexDiamond抛光系统Spirals,Diamond Twist SCL;第4组(GP4),Sof Lex粗黑色椎间盘,多槽钻和Occlubrush。对粗糙度和光泽度进行评估,然后通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对样品进行检查,以分析精加工和抛光后的形态。结果从表面粗糙度来看,GP1和GP2的Ra、Ry、Rz和Rq参数值相似;而GP3在所有参数中显示最低值;GP4的Ra值最高。关于光泽度,值降低如下:GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1(p<0.05)。扫描电子显微照片显示,随着GP1和GP4表面粗糙度的增加,样品的磨损。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计评价(p<0.05)。结论树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度和光泽度取决于所用的精加工和抛光系统。这项研究表明,使用基于金刚石膏的系统可以获得令人满意的光泽结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of four different finishing and polishing systems on resin composites: roughness surface and gloss retention evaluations.
BACKGROUND Finishing and polishing procedures play a crucial role to achieve the best aesthetic result of direct restorations. Many manufacturers to the clinicians offer different finishing and polishing systems. This study aims to examine the behavior of four different finishing and polishing systems on the roughness, gloss and morphology surface of one resin composite. METHODS Twelve Filtek XTE Supreme (3M ESPE) discs were prepared and divided into 4 groups (n=3), depending on the different finishing and polishing systems: Group 1 (GP1) Sof-Lex Extra- Thin XT discs; Group 2 (GP2) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals; Group 3 (GP3) Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur, Sof-Lex Diamond Polishing System Spirals, Diamond Twist SCL; Group 4 (GP4) with Sof-Lex Coarse black disc, multi-fluted bur and Occlubrush. The roughness and gloss were evaluated and then samples examined by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) to analyse the morphology after finishing and polishing. RESULTS Regarding the surface roughness, GP1 and GP2 showed similar values for Ra, Ry, Rz and Rq parameters; while GP3 displayed the lowest values in all parameters; GP4 had the highest Ra value. Regarding the gloss, the values decreased as follows: GP3>GP2=GP4>GP1 (p<0.05). Scanning electron micrographs showed the abrasion of the samples with an increase in the surfaceroughness in GP1 and GP4. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test was used for statistical evaluations (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The roughness and gloss surface of resin composites depend on the finishing and polishing systems used. This study demonstrates that satisfactory gloss outcomes are obtained using a system based on diamond paste.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva stomatologica
Minerva stomatologica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Stomatologica publishes scientific papers on dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信