可持续建筑的新视野

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
B. Muller
{"title":"可持续建筑的新视野","authors":"B. Muller","doi":"10.3167/NC.2018.130201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I explore conceptual strategies encouraging an ecologically\nresponsive, water-centric approach to architectural design, such\nthat design interventions become nature/culture hybrids connecting urban\ndwellers to larger hydrological conditions. I consider the notion of horizons\nas one mechanism for working out a trajectory for sustainable architecture,\none that highlights experiential and environmental concerns simultaneously.\nIn a conceptual shift, theorist David Leatherbarrow’s treatment of “three\narchitectural horizons” (the equipmental—the objects of one’s immediate\nsetting; the practical—the enclosure of a building; and the environmental—\nwhat lies beyond) are reshuffled: the practical expands to the watershed (the\nbioregion as common dwelling place) while environmental processes couple\nwith the equipment of buildings, such that architectures deliver net positive\nwatershed impact.","PeriodicalId":46069,"journal":{"name":"Nature + Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/NC.2018.130201","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Horizons for Sustainable Architecture\",\"authors\":\"B. Muller\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/NC.2018.130201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I explore conceptual strategies encouraging an ecologically\\nresponsive, water-centric approach to architectural design, such\\nthat design interventions become nature/culture hybrids connecting urban\\ndwellers to larger hydrological conditions. I consider the notion of horizons\\nas one mechanism for working out a trajectory for sustainable architecture,\\none that highlights experiential and environmental concerns simultaneously.\\nIn a conceptual shift, theorist David Leatherbarrow’s treatment of “three\\narchitectural horizons” (the equipmental—the objects of one’s immediate\\nsetting; the practical—the enclosure of a building; and the environmental—\\nwhat lies beyond) are reshuffled: the practical expands to the watershed (the\\nbioregion as common dwelling place) while environmental processes couple\\nwith the equipment of buildings, such that architectures deliver net positive\\nwatershed impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature + Culture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/NC.2018.130201\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature + Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/NC.2018.130201\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature + Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/NC.2018.130201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇文章中,我探讨了一些概念策略,鼓励在建筑设计中采用生态响应、以水为中心的方法,使设计干预成为自然/文化的混合体,将城市居民与更大的水文条件联系起来。我认为水平的概念是制定可持续建筑轨迹的一种机制,同时强调体验和环境问题。在概念上的转变中,理论家大卫·莱瑟巴罗(David Leatherbarrow)对“三个建筑视野”(设备——一个人直接设定的对象;实用——建筑的围护结构;以及环境——超越的东西)的处理被重新洗牌:实用扩展到分水岭(作为共同居住场所的底层),而环境过程与建筑的设备相结合,从而使体系结构产生净的正向分水岭影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New Horizons for Sustainable Architecture
In this article, I explore conceptual strategies encouraging an ecologically responsive, water-centric approach to architectural design, such that design interventions become nature/culture hybrids connecting urban dwellers to larger hydrological conditions. I consider the notion of horizons as one mechanism for working out a trajectory for sustainable architecture, one that highlights experiential and environmental concerns simultaneously. In a conceptual shift, theorist David Leatherbarrow’s treatment of “three architectural horizons” (the equipmental—the objects of one’s immediate setting; the practical—the enclosure of a building; and the environmental— what lies beyond) are reshuffled: the practical expands to the watershed (the bioregion as common dwelling place) while environmental processes couple with the equipment of buildings, such that architectures deliver net positive watershed impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature + Culture
Nature + Culture ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信