重塑悲惨世界：默里·罗斯巴德与无政府资本主义的诞生

IF 0.6 2区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1353/jhi.2022.0015

Jacob Jensen

{"title":"重塑悲惨世界：默里·罗斯巴德与无政府资本主义的诞生","authors":"Jacob Jensen","doi":"10.1353/jhi.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines how Murray Rothbard, though he claimed to follow Ludwig von Mises very closely, ended up making a number of radical leaps that Mises never did. It argues that Rothbard constructed anarchocapitalism by repurposing Mises's economic theory. First, whereas Mises responded to interwar socialism, Rothbard redeployed his mentor's economics in response to the militarism of the right-wing. Second, whereas Mises defended the market as a consumers' democracy against ideas about economic democracy, Rothbard developed an anti-democratic view of the market in response to the egalitarianism of the counterculture. These differences in context account for the distinctiveness of anarchocapitalism.","PeriodicalId":47274,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","volume":"83 1","pages":"315 - 332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repurposing Mises: Murray Rothbard and the Birth of Anarchocapitalism\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jhi.2022.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines how Murray Rothbard, though he claimed to follow Ludwig von Mises very closely, ended up making a number of radical leaps that Mises never did. It argues that Rothbard constructed anarchocapitalism by repurposing Mises's economic theory. First, whereas Mises responded to interwar socialism, Rothbard redeployed his mentor's economics in response to the militarism of the right-wing. Second, whereas Mises defended the market as a consumers' democracy against ideas about economic democracy, Rothbard developed an anti-democratic view of the market in response to the egalitarianism of the counterculture. These differences in context account for the distinctiveness of anarchocapitalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"315 - 332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2022.0015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:本文考察了穆雷·罗斯巴德虽然自称与路德维希·冯·米塞斯有着密切的联系，但最终却做出了一些米塞斯从未做过的激进飞跃。它认为罗斯巴德通过重新利用米塞斯的经济理论来构建无政府资本主义。首先，当米塞斯回应两次世界大战之间的社会主义时，罗斯巴德重新部署了他导师的经济学来回应右翼军国主义。其次，米塞斯捍卫市场是消费者的民主，反对有关经济民主的思想，而罗斯巴德则发展了一种反民主的市场观点，以回应反主流文化的平均主义。这些背景上的差异说明了无政府资本主义的独特性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Repurposing Mises: Murray Rothbard and the Birth of Anarchocapitalism

Abstract:This article examines how Murray Rothbard, though he claimed to follow Ludwig von Mises very closely, ended up making a number of radical leaps that Mises never did. It argues that Rothbard constructed anarchocapitalism by repurposing Mises's economic theory. First, whereas Mises responded to interwar socialism, Rothbard redeployed his mentor's economics in response to the militarism of the right-wing. Second, whereas Mises defended the market as a consumers' democracy against ideas about economic democracy, Rothbard developed an anti-democratic view of the market in response to the egalitarianism of the counterculture. These differences in context account for the distinctiveness of anarchocapitalism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF IDEAS PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Since its inception in 1940, the Journal of the History of Ideas has served as a medium for the publication of research in intellectual history that is of common interest to scholars and students in a wide range of fields. It is committed to encouraging diversity in regional coverage, chronological range, and methodological approaches. JHI defines intellectual history expansively and ecumenically, including the histories of philosophy, of literature and the arts, of the natural and social sciences, of religion, and of political thought. It also encourages scholarship at the intersections of cultural and intellectual history — for example, the history of the book and of visual culture.