Jason Chung , Sajjad Afraz , Federico Germini , Ivan Stevic , Davide Matino , Anthony KC. Chan
{"title":"大鼠模型中血浆D-二聚体检测值和方法的异质性:系统综述","authors":"Jason Chung , Sajjad Afraz , Federico Germini , Ivan Stevic , Davide Matino , Anthony KC. Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.tru.2023.100133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Plasma D-Dimer (DD) is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin and represents the activation of the fibrinolytic and coagulation system. Clinically, DD tests have a high negative prediction value for thrombotic events and can be used to rule-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DD cut-off value for VTE in humans is 500 ng/mL; however, the baseline and cut-off values for rats are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To systematically evaluate the reported results and methodology of DD tests on rat models.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science to include relevant full-length publications, published abstracts and conference proceedings from Jan-01-2000 to Dec-20-2019 that reported rat DD values. The search strategy used categorical search terms: “rat” AND “D-dimer” OR “fibrin degradation product”. Eligible articles were independently reviewed for strain, age, sex, baseline DD and measurement methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 520 identified records 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. The three primary rat strains used had a body mass ranging from 160 to 410 g and of both sexes were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in reported baseline DD that was seen both, within and between rat strains and detection methodologies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Large discrepancies in reported rat plasma DD values suggest that factors such as species and detection methods can lead to the variation of results and should be considered when designing a rat model that measures DD. We recommend using related negative control models as a baseline DD reference range for each study aiming to measure DD level in rats. Further research is required to establish a standardized reference range for baseline DD levels to help scientists better interpret rat DD test results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34401,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneity in the reported values and methodologies for detecting plasma D-Dimer in rat models: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Jason Chung , Sajjad Afraz , Federico Germini , Ivan Stevic , Davide Matino , Anthony KC. Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tru.2023.100133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Plasma D-Dimer (DD) is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin and represents the activation of the fibrinolytic and coagulation system. Clinically, DD tests have a high negative prediction value for thrombotic events and can be used to rule-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DD cut-off value for VTE in humans is 500 ng/mL; however, the baseline and cut-off values for rats are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To systematically evaluate the reported results and methodology of DD tests on rat models.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science to include relevant full-length publications, published abstracts and conference proceedings from Jan-01-2000 to Dec-20-2019 that reported rat DD values. The search strategy used categorical search terms: “rat” AND “D-dimer” OR “fibrin degradation product”. Eligible articles were independently reviewed for strain, age, sex, baseline DD and measurement methodology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 520 identified records 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. The three primary rat strains used had a body mass ranging from 160 to 410 g and of both sexes were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in reported baseline DD that was seen both, within and between rat strains and detection methodologies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Large discrepancies in reported rat plasma DD values suggest that factors such as species and detection methods can lead to the variation of results and should be considered when designing a rat model that measures DD. We recommend using related negative control models as a baseline DD reference range for each study aiming to measure DD level in rats. Further research is required to establish a standardized reference range for baseline DD levels to help scientists better interpret rat DD test results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thrombosis Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572723000044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572723000044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血浆d -二聚体(DD)是交联纤维蛋白的降解产物,代表了纤溶和凝血系统的激活。临床上,DD试验对血栓事件有很高的阴性预测值,可用于排除静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)。人类静脉血栓栓塞的DD临界值为500纳克/毫升;然而,大鼠的基线值和临界值是未知的。目的对已报道的大鼠模型DD试验结果和方法进行系统评价。方法采用MEDLINE、EMBASE和Web of Science进行系统文献检索,检索2000年1月1日至2019年12月20日期间报道大鼠DD值的相关全文出版物、已发表摘要和会议论文集。搜索策略使用分类搜索词:“大鼠”和“d -二聚体”或“纤维蛋白降解产物”。对符合条件的文章进行独立审查,包括菌株、年龄、性别、基线DD和测量方法。结果在520份确定的记录中,有60份研究被纳入定性分析。所使用的三种主要大鼠品系的体重在160至410克之间,雌雄都包括在分析中。报告的基线DD在大鼠品系内和品系之间以及检测方法上均有显著差异。结论报告的大鼠血浆DD值存在较大差异,表明物种和检测方法等因素可能导致结果的差异,在设计测量DD的大鼠模型时应考虑这些因素。我们建议在每项旨在测量大鼠DD水平的研究中使用相关的阴性对照模型作为基线DD参考范围。为了帮助科学家更好地解释大鼠DD测试结果,需要进一步的研究来建立一个标准化的基线DD水平参考范围。
Heterogeneity in the reported values and methodologies for detecting plasma D-Dimer in rat models: A systematic review
Background
Plasma D-Dimer (DD) is a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin and represents the activation of the fibrinolytic and coagulation system. Clinically, DD tests have a high negative prediction value for thrombotic events and can be used to rule-out venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DD cut-off value for VTE in humans is 500 ng/mL; however, the baseline and cut-off values for rats are unknown.
Aims
To systematically evaluate the reported results and methodology of DD tests on rat models.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science to include relevant full-length publications, published abstracts and conference proceedings from Jan-01-2000 to Dec-20-2019 that reported rat DD values. The search strategy used categorical search terms: “rat” AND “D-dimer” OR “fibrin degradation product”. Eligible articles were independently reviewed for strain, age, sex, baseline DD and measurement methodology.
Results
Of the 520 identified records 60 studies were included for qualitative analysis. The three primary rat strains used had a body mass ranging from 160 to 410 g and of both sexes were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in reported baseline DD that was seen both, within and between rat strains and detection methodologies.
Conclusion
Large discrepancies in reported rat plasma DD values suggest that factors such as species and detection methods can lead to the variation of results and should be considered when designing a rat model that measures DD. We recommend using related negative control models as a baseline DD reference range for each study aiming to measure DD level in rats. Further research is required to establish a standardized reference range for baseline DD levels to help scientists better interpret rat DD test results.