{"title":"班图西海岸的不稳定草原","authors":"Sara Pacchiarotti, K. Bostoen","doi":"10.1075/jhl.20054.bos","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this article, we present the first quantitative study of what we call multiple unconditioned reflexes (MUR) in\n Bantu, more specifically of Proto-Bantu velar stops *k and *g in the West-Coastal Bantu (WCB) branch of the Bantu language family.\n MUR, also known as “doubles reflexes” in Bantu studies, represent a situation where one and the same proto-sound has two or more\n reflexes in a given language which cannot be accounted for by phonological conditioning and/or lexical borrowing. This diachronic\n irregularity has been explained in Bantu historical linguistics, and Niger-Congo studies more broadly, by reconstructing either an\n additional series of consonants (phonemic merger) or a latent conditioning that went lost (phonemic split). We show that MUR\n should not be explained, but rather taken as an indicator of the same pervasive irregularity of sound change reported in other\n parts of the world that are highly multilingual and lack a neat overlap between distinct languages and communities. Along with\n widespread multilingualism, we assess lexical diffusion, substrate influence, and spread-over-spread events in Bantu language\n history as complementary explanations for the rise of MUR in WCB.","PeriodicalId":42165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erratic velars in West-Coastal Bantu\",\"authors\":\"Sara Pacchiarotti, K. Bostoen\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jhl.20054.bos\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In this article, we present the first quantitative study of what we call multiple unconditioned reflexes (MUR) in\\n Bantu, more specifically of Proto-Bantu velar stops *k and *g in the West-Coastal Bantu (WCB) branch of the Bantu language family.\\n MUR, also known as “doubles reflexes” in Bantu studies, represent a situation where one and the same proto-sound has two or more\\n reflexes in a given language which cannot be accounted for by phonological conditioning and/or lexical borrowing. This diachronic\\n irregularity has been explained in Bantu historical linguistics, and Niger-Congo studies more broadly, by reconstructing either an\\n additional series of consonants (phonemic merger) or a latent conditioning that went lost (phonemic split). We show that MUR\\n should not be explained, but rather taken as an indicator of the same pervasive irregularity of sound change reported in other\\n parts of the world that are highly multilingual and lack a neat overlap between distinct languages and communities. Along with\\n widespread multilingualism, we assess lexical diffusion, substrate influence, and spread-over-spread events in Bantu language\\n history as complementary explanations for the rise of MUR in WCB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Historical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20054.bos\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.20054.bos","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article, we present the first quantitative study of what we call multiple unconditioned reflexes (MUR) in
Bantu, more specifically of Proto-Bantu velar stops *k and *g in the West-Coastal Bantu (WCB) branch of the Bantu language family.
MUR, also known as “doubles reflexes” in Bantu studies, represent a situation where one and the same proto-sound has two or more
reflexes in a given language which cannot be accounted for by phonological conditioning and/or lexical borrowing. This diachronic
irregularity has been explained in Bantu historical linguistics, and Niger-Congo studies more broadly, by reconstructing either an
additional series of consonants (phonemic merger) or a latent conditioning that went lost (phonemic split). We show that MUR
should not be explained, but rather taken as an indicator of the same pervasive irregularity of sound change reported in other
parts of the world that are highly multilingual and lack a neat overlap between distinct languages and communities. Along with
widespread multilingualism, we assess lexical diffusion, substrate influence, and spread-over-spread events in Bantu language
history as complementary explanations for the rise of MUR in WCB.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Linguistics aims to publish, after peer-review, papers that make a significant contribution to the theory and/or methodology of historical linguistics. Papers dealing with any language or language family are welcome. Papers should have a diachronic orientation and should offer new perspectives, refine existing methodologies, or challenge received wisdom, on the basis of careful analysis of extant historical data. We are especially keen to publish work which links historical linguistics to corpus-based research, linguistic typology, language variation, language contact, or the study of language and cognition, all of which constitute a major source of methodological renewal for the discipline and shed light on aspects of language change. Contributions in areas such as diachronic corpus linguistics or diachronic typology are therefore particularly welcome.