移民语言测试:共同建构验证

IF 1.4 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
B. O’Sullivan, Micheline B. Chalhoub-Deville
{"title":"移民语言测试:共同建构验证","authors":"B. O’Sullivan, Micheline B. Chalhoub-Deville","doi":"10.1080/15434303.2021.1986513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present issue provides a much-needed space to key issues not visible in our discourse in language testing and research. The various articles delve into research, policy, test development, and validity considerations for migrants who are increasingly mandated to take language and literacy tests. The papers point to issues of “test misuse,” bias, negative impact, and altogether different test taker populations, which tend to have low literacy in their first languages. While many of the concerns raised in this special issue relate specifically to the testing of language learners with low print literacy, there are lessons here for test development and validation theory across the board. In our commentary, we will focus primarily on issues of validation. This seems to be a critical theme in all the papers included in the present issue. We and the authors in this special issue argue that the language testing community needs to revisit validity theory considering the intricate connections between language testing and migration policies. Validation, as clearly shown in this issues, needs to be co-constructed by key stakeholder groups at the design, development, administration, research, and use levels.","PeriodicalId":46873,"journal":{"name":"Language Assessment Quarterly","volume":"18 1","pages":"547 - 557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language Testing for Migrants: Co-Constructing Validation\",\"authors\":\"B. O’Sullivan, Micheline B. Chalhoub-Deville\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15434303.2021.1986513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present issue provides a much-needed space to key issues not visible in our discourse in language testing and research. The various articles delve into research, policy, test development, and validity considerations for migrants who are increasingly mandated to take language and literacy tests. The papers point to issues of “test misuse,” bias, negative impact, and altogether different test taker populations, which tend to have low literacy in their first languages. While many of the concerns raised in this special issue relate specifically to the testing of language learners with low print literacy, there are lessons here for test development and validation theory across the board. In our commentary, we will focus primarily on issues of validation. This seems to be a critical theme in all the papers included in the present issue. We and the authors in this special issue argue that the language testing community needs to revisit validity theory considering the intricate connections between language testing and migration policies. Validation, as clearly shown in this issues, needs to be co-constructed by key stakeholder groups at the design, development, administration, research, and use levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Assessment Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"547 - 557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Assessment Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1986513\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Assessment Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2021.1986513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当前的问题为语言测试和研究中缺少的关键问题提供了一个急需的空间。各种各样的文章深入探讨了研究、政策、测试开发以及对越来越多被要求参加语言和识字测试的移民的有效性考虑。这些论文指出了“考试滥用”、偏见、负面影响以及完全不同的考生群体等问题,这些考生的第一语言读写能力往往较低。虽然这期特刊中提出的许多问题都是专门针对文字读写能力低的语言学习者的测试,但这里也有测试开发和验证理论的经验教训。在我们的评论中,我们将主要关注验证问题。这似乎是本期所有论文的一个关键主题。我们和这期特刊的作者认为,考虑到语言测试和移民政策之间错综复杂的联系,语言测试界需要重新审视效度理论。正如本问题中清楚显示的那样,验证需要在设计、开发、管理、研究和使用级别上由关键涉众小组共同构建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Language Testing for Migrants: Co-Constructing Validation
The present issue provides a much-needed space to key issues not visible in our discourse in language testing and research. The various articles delve into research, policy, test development, and validity considerations for migrants who are increasingly mandated to take language and literacy tests. The papers point to issues of “test misuse,” bias, negative impact, and altogether different test taker populations, which tend to have low literacy in their first languages. While many of the concerns raised in this special issue relate specifically to the testing of language learners with low print literacy, there are lessons here for test development and validation theory across the board. In our commentary, we will focus primarily on issues of validation. This seems to be a critical theme in all the papers included in the present issue. We and the authors in this special issue argue that the language testing community needs to revisit validity theory considering the intricate connections between language testing and migration policies. Validation, as clearly shown in this issues, needs to be co-constructed by key stakeholder groups at the design, development, administration, research, and use levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信