接受姑息性系统治疗的软组织肉瘤患者骨转移的预后意义:EORTC软组织和骨肉瘤组(STBSG)数据库的探索性回顾性汇总分析

Q2 Medicine
Sarcoma Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5815875
G. Kantidakis, S. Litière, H. Gelderblom, M. Fiocco, I. Judson, W. V. D. van der Graaf, A. Italiano, S. Marréaud, S. Sleijfer, G. Mechtersheimer, C. Messiou, B. Kasper
{"title":"接受姑息性系统治疗的软组织肉瘤患者骨转移的预后意义:EORTC软组织和骨肉瘤组(STBSG)数据库的探索性回顾性汇总分析","authors":"G. Kantidakis, S. Litière, H. Gelderblom, M. Fiocco, I. Judson, W. V. D. van der Graaf, A. Italiano, S. Marréaud, S. Sleijfer, G. Mechtersheimer, C. Messiou, B. Kasper","doi":"10.1155/2022/5815875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a rare group of heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours containing more than 100 histologic subtypes. Here, we investigate whether, and if so, to what extent, skeletal metastases affect the outcome of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Materials and Methods Selected patients participated in five clinical trials of EORTC-STBSG. Individuals were included if they started treatment with an active drug and had advanced/metastatic STS. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate pooled analyses (after correcting for 12 covariates) were employed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression to model the impact of bone metastasis at presentation per treatment line stratified by study. For the subset of patients with bone metastasis, the impact of another metastatic organ site was explored with multivariate Cox regression models. Results 565 out of 1034 (54.6%) patients received first-line systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Bone metastases were present in 140 patients (77 first-line, 63 second-line or higher). The unadjusted difference in OS/PFS with or without bone metastasis was statistically significant only for first-line patients. For OS, the adjusted hazard ratios for bone metastasis presence were 1.33 (95%-CI: 0.99–1.78) and 1.11 (95%-CI: 0.81–1.52) for first-line/second-line or higher treated patients, respectively. Likewise, the adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.00–1.73) and 1.07 (95%-CI: 0.80–1.43). Effects were not statistically significant, despite a trend in first-line patients for both endpoints. Subgroup analyses indicated bone and lymph node metastasis as the most detrimental combination for OS and bone and lung metastasis for PFS. Conclusions Adult STS patients receiving palliative systemic therapy with bone metastasis carried an overall worse prognosis than STS patients without bone metastases. Skeletal metastasis was detrimental for both OS and PFS, independent of the treatment line. Findings may have implications for the management of these patients.","PeriodicalId":21431,"journal":{"name":"Sarcoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Significance of Bone Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Receiving Palliative Systemic Therapy: An Explorative, Retrospective Pooled Analysis of the EORTC-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) Database\",\"authors\":\"G. Kantidakis, S. Litière, H. Gelderblom, M. Fiocco, I. Judson, W. V. D. van der Graaf, A. Italiano, S. Marréaud, S. Sleijfer, G. Mechtersheimer, C. Messiou, B. Kasper\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/5815875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a rare group of heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours containing more than 100 histologic subtypes. Here, we investigate whether, and if so, to what extent, skeletal metastases affect the outcome of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Materials and Methods Selected patients participated in five clinical trials of EORTC-STBSG. Individuals were included if they started treatment with an active drug and had advanced/metastatic STS. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate pooled analyses (after correcting for 12 covariates) were employed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression to model the impact of bone metastasis at presentation per treatment line stratified by study. For the subset of patients with bone metastasis, the impact of another metastatic organ site was explored with multivariate Cox regression models. Results 565 out of 1034 (54.6%) patients received first-line systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Bone metastases were present in 140 patients (77 first-line, 63 second-line or higher). The unadjusted difference in OS/PFS with or without bone metastasis was statistically significant only for first-line patients. For OS, the adjusted hazard ratios for bone metastasis presence were 1.33 (95%-CI: 0.99–1.78) and 1.11 (95%-CI: 0.81–1.52) for first-line/second-line or higher treated patients, respectively. Likewise, the adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.00–1.73) and 1.07 (95%-CI: 0.80–1.43). Effects were not statistically significant, despite a trend in first-line patients for both endpoints. Subgroup analyses indicated bone and lymph node metastasis as the most detrimental combination for OS and bone and lung metastasis for PFS. Conclusions Adult STS patients receiving palliative systemic therapy with bone metastasis carried an overall worse prognosis than STS patients without bone metastases. Skeletal metastasis was detrimental for both OS and PFS, independent of the treatment line. Findings may have implications for the management of these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sarcoma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sarcoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5815875\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sarcoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5815875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景软组织肉瘤(STS)是一组罕见的异质性间充质肿瘤,包含100多种组织学亚型。在这里,我们研究了骨骼转移是否影响晚期或转移性疾病患者的预后,如果是,影响程度。材料与方法选择患者参加EORTC-STBSG的5项临床试验。如果个体开始用活性药物治疗并患有晚期/转移性STS,则将其包括在内。感兴趣的终点是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。采用Kaplan–Meier和Cox回归的单变量和多变量合并分析(在校正了12个协变量后),按研究分层,对每个治疗线的骨转移影响进行建模。对于骨转移患者的亚群,用多变量Cox回归模型探讨了另一个转移器官部位的影响。结果1034名患者中有565名(54.6%)接受了局部晚期或转移性疾病的一线全身治疗。140名患者出现骨转移(77名一线患者,63名二线患者或以上)。有或没有骨转移的OS/PFS的未调整差异仅在一线患者中具有统计学意义。对于OS,一线/二线或更高级别治疗患者的骨转移风险比分别为1.33(95%CI:0.99–1.78)和1.11(95%CI:0.81–1.52)。同样,PFS的调整后危险比分别为1.31(95%CI:1.00-1.73)和1.07(95%CI:0.80-1.43)。尽管一线患者在这两个终点都有趋势,但效果没有统计学意义。亚组分析表明,骨和淋巴结转移是OS和骨和肺转移对PFS最不利的组合。结论接受姑息性系统性骨转移治疗的成人STS患者的预后总体上比没有骨转移的STS患者差。骨骼转移对OS和PFS都是有害的,与治疗线无关。研究结果可能对这些患者的管理有启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic Significance of Bone Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Receiving Palliative Systemic Therapy: An Explorative, Retrospective Pooled Analysis of the EORTC-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) Database
Background Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) constitute a rare group of heterogeneous mesenchymal tumours containing more than 100 histologic subtypes. Here, we investigate whether, and if so, to what extent, skeletal metastases affect the outcome of patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Materials and Methods Selected patients participated in five clinical trials of EORTC-STBSG. Individuals were included if they started treatment with an active drug and had advanced/metastatic STS. The endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate pooled analyses (after correcting for 12 covariates) were employed with Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression to model the impact of bone metastasis at presentation per treatment line stratified by study. For the subset of patients with bone metastasis, the impact of another metastatic organ site was explored with multivariate Cox regression models. Results 565 out of 1034 (54.6%) patients received first-line systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease. Bone metastases were present in 140 patients (77 first-line, 63 second-line or higher). The unadjusted difference in OS/PFS with or without bone metastasis was statistically significant only for first-line patients. For OS, the adjusted hazard ratios for bone metastasis presence were 1.33 (95%-CI: 0.99–1.78) and 1.11 (95%-CI: 0.81–1.52) for first-line/second-line or higher treated patients, respectively. Likewise, the adjusted hazard ratios for PFS were 1.31 (95%-CI: 1.00–1.73) and 1.07 (95%-CI: 0.80–1.43). Effects were not statistically significant, despite a trend in first-line patients for both endpoints. Subgroup analyses indicated bone and lymph node metastasis as the most detrimental combination for OS and bone and lung metastasis for PFS. Conclusions Adult STS patients receiving palliative systemic therapy with bone metastasis carried an overall worse prognosis than STS patients without bone metastases. Skeletal metastasis was detrimental for both OS and PFS, independent of the treatment line. Findings may have implications for the management of these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sarcoma
Sarcoma Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Sarcoma is dedicated to publishing papers covering all aspects of connective tissue oncology research. It brings together work from scientists and clinicians carrying out a broad range of research in this field, including the basic sciences, molecular biology and pathology and the clinical sciences of epidemiology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. High-quality papers concerning the entire range of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in both adults and children, including Kaposi"s sarcoma, are published as well as preclinical and animal studies. This journal provides a central forum for the description of advances in diagnosis, assessment and treatment of this rarely seen, but often mismanaged, group of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信