级联双馈感应发电机的滑模及终端滑模控制

Q3 Energy
H. Abdolhadi, G. Markadeh, S. T. Boroujeni
{"title":"级联双馈感应发电机的滑模及终端滑模控制","authors":"H. Abdolhadi, G. Markadeh, S. T. Boroujeni","doi":"10.22068/IJEEE.17.3.1955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical structure of Doubly Fed Induction Generators (DFIGs) is not completely adapted in high-speed regions due to their brushes and slip rings. So in the Cascaded DFIGs (CDFIGs), the rotor windings of a given DFIG are supplied by another wound rotor induction machine leading to a complete brushless structure. This paper presents and compares Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Terminal Sliding Mode Control (TSMC) methods to control the output voltage of CDFIG. The SMC and TSMC methods are identified as strong controllers with large stability and robustness margins. In this paper, the SMC and TSMC methods are evaluated and compared to the conventional Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) in terms of output voltage change, prime over speed’s variation, and nonlinear load. Simulation and experimental results using a TMS320F28335 based prototype system show that the SMC and TSMC techniques are more robust against parameter variations and uncertainties, and TSMC offers improved dynamic response.","PeriodicalId":39055,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":"1955-1955"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sliding Mode and Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction Generator\",\"authors\":\"H. Abdolhadi, G. Markadeh, S. T. Boroujeni\",\"doi\":\"10.22068/IJEEE.17.3.1955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Classical structure of Doubly Fed Induction Generators (DFIGs) is not completely adapted in high-speed regions due to their brushes and slip rings. So in the Cascaded DFIGs (CDFIGs), the rotor windings of a given DFIG are supplied by another wound rotor induction machine leading to a complete brushless structure. This paper presents and compares Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Terminal Sliding Mode Control (TSMC) methods to control the output voltage of CDFIG. The SMC and TSMC methods are identified as strong controllers with large stability and robustness margins. In this paper, the SMC and TSMC methods are evaluated and compared to the conventional Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) in terms of output voltage change, prime over speed’s variation, and nonlinear load. Simulation and experimental results using a TMS320F28335 based prototype system show that the SMC and TSMC techniques are more robust against parameter variations and uncertainties, and TSMC offers improved dynamic response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1955-1955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22068/IJEEE.17.3.1955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22068/IJEEE.17.3.1955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

双馈感应发电机(DFIGs)的经典结构由于其电刷和滑环的存在而不能完全适应高速区域。因此,在级联DFIG (cdfig)中,给定DFIG的转子绕组由另一个绕线转子感应电机提供,从而形成完整的无刷结构。本文介绍并比较了滑模控制(SMC)和终端滑模控制(TSMC)两种控制CDFIG输出电压的方法。SMC和TSMC方法被认为是具有大稳定性和鲁棒性裕度的强控制器。本文从输出电压变化、初始转速变化和非线性负载等方面,对SMC和TSMC方法与传统的电压定向控制(VOC)方法进行了评价和比较。基于TMS320F28335的原型系统的仿真和实验结果表明,SMC和TSMC技术对参数变化和不确定性具有更强的鲁棒性,并且TSMC提供了更好的动态响应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sliding Mode and Terminal Sliding Mode Control of Cascaded Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Classical structure of Doubly Fed Induction Generators (DFIGs) is not completely adapted in high-speed regions due to their brushes and slip rings. So in the Cascaded DFIGs (CDFIGs), the rotor windings of a given DFIG are supplied by another wound rotor induction machine leading to a complete brushless structure. This paper presents and compares Sliding Mode Control (SMC) and Terminal Sliding Mode Control (TSMC) methods to control the output voltage of CDFIG. The SMC and TSMC methods are identified as strong controllers with large stability and robustness margins. In this paper, the SMC and TSMC methods are evaluated and compared to the conventional Voltage Oriented Control (VOC) in terms of output voltage change, prime over speed’s variation, and nonlinear load. Simulation and experimental results using a TMS320F28335 based prototype system show that the SMC and TSMC techniques are more robust against parameter variations and uncertainties, and TSMC offers improved dynamic response.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Iranian Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信