作为文化批判的文化符号学*

IF 1.6 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION
A. Lorusso, F. Sedda
{"title":"作为文化批判的文化符号学*","authors":"A. Lorusso, F. Sedda","doi":"10.1080/10350330.2022.2157169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The text aims at investigating the vitality of Lotman's thought, focusing on its theoretical specificities (compared to other methodological approaches), on its recurring themes, but above all on its analytical, somehow “operational” utility. In particular, the authors reflect on the critical scope of Lotman's thought and on how the traditional unveiling vocation of semiotics finds in Lotman an adequate renewal for the problems posed by the contemporary world (populisms, new media ecosystems, new forms of collective subjectivity…).","PeriodicalId":21775,"journal":{"name":"Social Semiotics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"For a semiotics of culture as a critique of culture*\",\"authors\":\"A. Lorusso, F. Sedda\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10350330.2022.2157169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The text aims at investigating the vitality of Lotman's thought, focusing on its theoretical specificities (compared to other methodological approaches), on its recurring themes, but above all on its analytical, somehow “operational” utility. In particular, the authors reflect on the critical scope of Lotman's thought and on how the traditional unveiling vocation of semiotics finds in Lotman an adequate renewal for the problems posed by the contemporary world (populisms, new media ecosystems, new forms of collective subjectivity…).\",\"PeriodicalId\":21775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Semiotics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Semiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2157169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Semiotics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2022.2157169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文旨在考察洛特曼思想的生命力,重点关注其理论特点(与其他方法论方法相比),其反复出现的主题,但最重要的是其分析性的、不知何故的“操作性”效用。特别是,作者反思了洛特曼思想的批判范围,以及符号学的传统揭示职业如何在洛特曼身上为当代世界带来的问题(民粹主义、新媒体生态系统、集体主体性的新形式……)找到了充分的更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
For a semiotics of culture as a critique of culture*
ABSTRACT The text aims at investigating the vitality of Lotman's thought, focusing on its theoretical specificities (compared to other methodological approaches), on its recurring themes, but above all on its analytical, somehow “operational” utility. In particular, the authors reflect on the critical scope of Lotman's thought and on how the traditional unveiling vocation of semiotics finds in Lotman an adequate renewal for the problems posed by the contemporary world (populisms, new media ecosystems, new forms of collective subjectivity…).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Semiotics
Social Semiotics Multiple-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信