口服降糖药依从性与HbA1c水平的关系

Indana Ayu Soraya, R. Sauriasari, P. Prawiroharjo, H. W. Risni
{"title":"口服降糖药依从性与HbA1c水平的关系","authors":"Indana Ayu Soraya, R. Sauriasari, P. Prawiroharjo, H. W. Risni","doi":"10.7454/psr.v9i2.1260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adherence to taking medication is essential for patients with chronic diseases such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). There have been many studies about the association between medication adherence and HbA1c levels, but few have used Adherence Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) questionnaire and Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) method to measure adherence in Indonesian population. The aim of this study were to assess the association of medication adherence to HbA1c levels and compare two methods of adherence measurements. This research was conducted at Pasar Minggu Public Health Center, Jakarta using a cross-sectional design. The adherence assessment was conducted using a validated Indonesian version of the ARMS questionnaire and compared to the pharmacy refill adherence method using the PDC calculation. One hundred twenty-seven T2DM patients (75.6% female) with mean age of 58.69 years were recruited. The proportion of adhere patients as measured by ARMS was only 39.4% (50/127). Meanwhile, the proportion of adhere patients as measured by PDC was 77.2% (98/127). Adherence by both measurement showed significant association s with HbA1c <7% (ARMS, OR 4.000 (95% CI 1.705 – 9.386 ) , p = 0.002; PDC, OR 5.674 (95% CI 1.266 – 25.438), p = 0.024). After controlled by covariates, the result remained significant (ARMS, a OR 4. 281 (95% CI 1.78 5 – 10.267, p = 0.00 1 ; PDC, a OR 5. 83 (95% CI 1.287 – 2 6.4 05), p = 0.02 2). Adherence and HbA1c levels was significantly associated even after controlling covariates. ARMS and PDC generated different proportions of adhere patients and may indicate the need of combining the two methods in measuring adherence.","PeriodicalId":55754,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Adherence to Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent and HbA1c Level\",\"authors\":\"Indana Ayu Soraya, R. Sauriasari, P. Prawiroharjo, H. W. Risni\",\"doi\":\"10.7454/psr.v9i2.1260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Adherence to taking medication is essential for patients with chronic diseases such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). There have been many studies about the association between medication adherence and HbA1c levels, but few have used Adherence Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) questionnaire and Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) method to measure adherence in Indonesian population. The aim of this study were to assess the association of medication adherence to HbA1c levels and compare two methods of adherence measurements. This research was conducted at Pasar Minggu Public Health Center, Jakarta using a cross-sectional design. The adherence assessment was conducted using a validated Indonesian version of the ARMS questionnaire and compared to the pharmacy refill adherence method using the PDC calculation. One hundred twenty-seven T2DM patients (75.6% female) with mean age of 58.69 years were recruited. The proportion of adhere patients as measured by ARMS was only 39.4% (50/127). Meanwhile, the proportion of adhere patients as measured by PDC was 77.2% (98/127). Adherence by both measurement showed significant association s with HbA1c <7% (ARMS, OR 4.000 (95% CI 1.705 – 9.386 ) , p = 0.002; PDC, OR 5.674 (95% CI 1.266 – 25.438), p = 0.024). After controlled by covariates, the result remained significant (ARMS, a OR 4. 281 (95% CI 1.78 5 – 10.267, p = 0.00 1 ; PDC, a OR 5. 83 (95% CI 1.287 – 2 6.4 05), p = 0.02 2). Adherence and HbA1c levels was significantly associated even after controlling covariates. ARMS and PDC generated different proportions of adhere patients and may indicate the need of combining the two methods in measuring adherence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7454/psr.v9i2.1260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7454/psr.v9i2.1260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

坚持服药对患有2型糖尿病(T2DM)等慢性疾病的患者至关重要。关于药物依从性与HbA1c水平之间的关系,已有许多研究,但很少有人使用依从性再填充和药物量表(ARMS)问卷和覆盖天数比例(PDC)方法来衡量印尼人群的依从性。本研究的目的是评估药物依从性与HbA1c水平的关系,并比较两种依从性测量方法。这项研究是在雅加达Pasar Minggu公共卫生中心进行的,采用了横断面设计。使用经验证的印尼版ARMS问卷进行依从性评估,并使用PDC计算将其与药房补充依从性方法进行比较。共招募127名T2DM患者(75.6%为女性),平均年龄58.69岁。通过ARMS测量,粘连患者的比例仅为39.4%(50/127)。同时,PDC测量的粘连患者比例为77.2%(98/127)。两项测量的依从性均与HbA1c<7%显著相关(ARMS,OR 4.000(95%CI 1.705–9.386),p=0.002;PDC,OR 5.674(95%CI 1.266–25.438),p=0.024)。在受协变量控制后,结果仍然显著(ARMS,OR 4。281(95%置信区间1.78 5–10.267,p=0.00 1;PDC,OR 5。83(95%可信区间1.287–2 6.4 05),p=0.02 2)。即使在控制协变量后,依从性和HbA1c水平也显著相关。ARMS和PDC产生了不同比例的粘连患者,这可能表明需要将这两种方法结合起来测量粘连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association between Adherence to Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent and HbA1c Level
Adherence to taking medication is essential for patients with chronic diseases such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). There have been many studies about the association between medication adherence and HbA1c levels, but few have used Adherence Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) questionnaire and Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) method to measure adherence in Indonesian population. The aim of this study were to assess the association of medication adherence to HbA1c levels and compare two methods of adherence measurements. This research was conducted at Pasar Minggu Public Health Center, Jakarta using a cross-sectional design. The adherence assessment was conducted using a validated Indonesian version of the ARMS questionnaire and compared to the pharmacy refill adherence method using the PDC calculation. One hundred twenty-seven T2DM patients (75.6% female) with mean age of 58.69 years were recruited. The proportion of adhere patients as measured by ARMS was only 39.4% (50/127). Meanwhile, the proportion of adhere patients as measured by PDC was 77.2% (98/127). Adherence by both measurement showed significant association s with HbA1c <7% (ARMS, OR 4.000 (95% CI 1.705 – 9.386 ) , p = 0.002; PDC, OR 5.674 (95% CI 1.266 – 25.438), p = 0.024). After controlled by covariates, the result remained significant (ARMS, a OR 4. 281 (95% CI 1.78 5 – 10.267, p = 0.00 1 ; PDC, a OR 5. 83 (95% CI 1.287 – 2 6.4 05), p = 0.02 2). Adherence and HbA1c levels was significantly associated even after controlling covariates. ARMS and PDC generated different proportions of adhere patients and may indicate the need of combining the two methods in measuring adherence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信