书评:你不应该谴责:一个关于死囚的信仰和主张的故事

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 N/A RELIGION
Michael Mawson
{"title":"书评:你不应该谴责:一个关于死囚的信仰和主张的故事","authors":"Michael Mawson","doi":"10.1177/00211400231166049c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter Nine is on communion, both sacramental and ecclesial. Addressing ecumenical issues after the eucharist is most fitting. But while Boland rightly affirms that Dominus Iesus was essentially affirming conciliar teaching, he eludes the difficult and sensitive topic of what distinguishes an ‘ecclesial community’ from a ‘church.’ (Here, the immediately preceding section on the Eucharist was waiting to be brought into the discussion.) Chapters 10, 11, and 12 are devoted to a variety of topics through a Trinitarian structure. In Chapter Ten, the discussion on salvation extra ecclesiam is fittingly preceded by an exposition of Christ’s capital grace (STh III, 7–8), a set of texts which are crucial for understanding Lumen Gentium 13–16. Chapter 11 gives the reader a theology of dialogue rooted in the prior dialogue initiated by God whose Love is breathed with his spoken Word. Chapter 12 considers the Church’s journey home to the Father with reference to the Israelites’ own journey, not only through the desert and settling the promised land, but also into exile and their ultimate homecoming. Some readers will thank Boland for not overburdening the text with notes; the presentation is clean and the argument moves. But there’s a lot more knowledge and reading that went into this book than what the notes indicate. Many readers would desire to follow more closely the intellectual path trod by an author as mature and experienced as Boland. There are also simple points of detail that many a reader would want to follow up on: e.g., where does Aquinas interpret Jn 19:26 as referring to Christ himself? Presentations of the Catholic faith vary. This reader, sensitive to the Christological deficit in so much theological writing, would have followed a number of theologians in prioritizing revelation (Dei Verbum) over the Church (Lumen Gentium), and therefore, would have started with a chapter on Christ. That said, Boland maintains a clear Christocentric focus throughout. The Spirit of Catholicism presents holistically the faith that is Catholicism: a range of topics are treated with a range of sources (though Aquinas is obviously privileged) so as to embrace the whole. Though not an apology, the writer clearly senses a need to respond to contemporary distortions of Catholicism. The writing is accessible, and both the scholar and the beginner will learn something from it. In addition to its being imbued with Scripture from start to finish, the power of the book is that, while it acknowledges with sensitivity all of the issues and difficulties people might have with Catholic Christianity today, it does not concede what cannot be conceded. The tone is honest, but not defeatist.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: You Shall Not Condemn: A Story of Faith and Advocacy on Death Row\",\"authors\":\"Michael Mawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00211400231166049c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter Nine is on communion, both sacramental and ecclesial. Addressing ecumenical issues after the eucharist is most fitting. But while Boland rightly affirms that Dominus Iesus was essentially affirming conciliar teaching, he eludes the difficult and sensitive topic of what distinguishes an ‘ecclesial community’ from a ‘church.’ (Here, the immediately preceding section on the Eucharist was waiting to be brought into the discussion.) Chapters 10, 11, and 12 are devoted to a variety of topics through a Trinitarian structure. In Chapter Ten, the discussion on salvation extra ecclesiam is fittingly preceded by an exposition of Christ’s capital grace (STh III, 7–8), a set of texts which are crucial for understanding Lumen Gentium 13–16. Chapter 11 gives the reader a theology of dialogue rooted in the prior dialogue initiated by God whose Love is breathed with his spoken Word. Chapter 12 considers the Church’s journey home to the Father with reference to the Israelites’ own journey, not only through the desert and settling the promised land, but also into exile and their ultimate homecoming. Some readers will thank Boland for not overburdening the text with notes; the presentation is clean and the argument moves. But there’s a lot more knowledge and reading that went into this book than what the notes indicate. Many readers would desire to follow more closely the intellectual path trod by an author as mature and experienced as Boland. There are also simple points of detail that many a reader would want to follow up on: e.g., where does Aquinas interpret Jn 19:26 as referring to Christ himself? Presentations of the Catholic faith vary. This reader, sensitive to the Christological deficit in so much theological writing, would have followed a number of theologians in prioritizing revelation (Dei Verbum) over the Church (Lumen Gentium), and therefore, would have started with a chapter on Christ. That said, Boland maintains a clear Christocentric focus throughout. The Spirit of Catholicism presents holistically the faith that is Catholicism: a range of topics are treated with a range of sources (though Aquinas is obviously privileged) so as to embrace the whole. Though not an apology, the writer clearly senses a need to respond to contemporary distortions of Catholicism. The writing is accessible, and both the scholar and the beginner will learn something from it. In addition to its being imbued with Scripture from start to finish, the power of the book is that, while it acknowledges with sensitivity all of the issues and difficulties people might have with Catholic Christianity today, it does not concede what cannot be conceded. The tone is honest, but not defeatist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Theological Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Theological Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400231166049c\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400231166049c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第九章是圣餐和教会圣餐。在圣餐后处理普世问题是最合适的。但是,尽管博兰德正确地肯定了多明尼斯·伊索斯本质上是在肯定简洁的教学,但他回避了“教会社区”与“教会”的区别这一棘手而敏感的话题(在这里,关于圣餐的前一节正在等待讨论。)第10、11和12章通过三位一体的结构专门讨论各种主题。在第十章中,在讨论教会外的救赎之前,恰当地阐述了基督的极重恩典(STh III,7-8),这是一组对理解鲁门真经13-16至关重要的文本。第11章为读者提供了一种对话神学,这种对话植根于上帝之前发起的对话,上帝的爱是用他的话语呼吸的。第12章参照以色列人自己的旅程,考虑了教会回家见父的旅程,不仅穿越沙漠,定居应许之地,还流亡海外,最终回家。一些读者会感谢博兰德没有用笔记加重文本的负担;陈述是干净的,论点是移动的。但这本书所包含的知识和阅读内容比笔记所示的要多得多。许多读者都希望更紧密地追随博兰德这样成熟而有经验的作家所走的知识之路。还有一些简单的细节点,许多读者都想跟进:例如,阿奎那在哪里解释约19:26指的是基督本人?对天主教信仰的介绍各不相同。这位读者对如此多神学著作中的基督论缺陷很敏感,他会追随许多神学家,将启示(Dei Verbum)置于教会(Lumen Gentium)之上,因此,他会从一章关于基督开始。尽管如此,博兰德始终保持着明确的以基督为中心的关注点。《天主教精神》从整体上呈现了天主教的信仰:一系列的主题都有一系列的来源(尽管阿奎那显然享有特权),以拥抱整体。虽然不是道歉,但作者清楚地感觉到有必要回应当代对天主教的扭曲。这本书很容易理解,学者和初学者都会从中学到一些东西。除了从头到尾都充满了圣经之外,这本书的力量在于,尽管它敏感地承认了当今人们在天主教中可能遇到的所有问题和困难,但它不承认不能承认的事情。语气是诚实的,但不是失败主义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: You Shall Not Condemn: A Story of Faith and Advocacy on Death Row
Chapter Nine is on communion, both sacramental and ecclesial. Addressing ecumenical issues after the eucharist is most fitting. But while Boland rightly affirms that Dominus Iesus was essentially affirming conciliar teaching, he eludes the difficult and sensitive topic of what distinguishes an ‘ecclesial community’ from a ‘church.’ (Here, the immediately preceding section on the Eucharist was waiting to be brought into the discussion.) Chapters 10, 11, and 12 are devoted to a variety of topics through a Trinitarian structure. In Chapter Ten, the discussion on salvation extra ecclesiam is fittingly preceded by an exposition of Christ’s capital grace (STh III, 7–8), a set of texts which are crucial for understanding Lumen Gentium 13–16. Chapter 11 gives the reader a theology of dialogue rooted in the prior dialogue initiated by God whose Love is breathed with his spoken Word. Chapter 12 considers the Church’s journey home to the Father with reference to the Israelites’ own journey, not only through the desert and settling the promised land, but also into exile and their ultimate homecoming. Some readers will thank Boland for not overburdening the text with notes; the presentation is clean and the argument moves. But there’s a lot more knowledge and reading that went into this book than what the notes indicate. Many readers would desire to follow more closely the intellectual path trod by an author as mature and experienced as Boland. There are also simple points of detail that many a reader would want to follow up on: e.g., where does Aquinas interpret Jn 19:26 as referring to Christ himself? Presentations of the Catholic faith vary. This reader, sensitive to the Christological deficit in so much theological writing, would have followed a number of theologians in prioritizing revelation (Dei Verbum) over the Church (Lumen Gentium), and therefore, would have started with a chapter on Christ. That said, Boland maintains a clear Christocentric focus throughout. The Spirit of Catholicism presents holistically the faith that is Catholicism: a range of topics are treated with a range of sources (though Aquinas is obviously privileged) so as to embrace the whole. Though not an apology, the writer clearly senses a need to respond to contemporary distortions of Catholicism. The writing is accessible, and both the scholar and the beginner will learn something from it. In addition to its being imbued with Scripture from start to finish, the power of the book is that, while it acknowledges with sensitivity all of the issues and difficulties people might have with Catholic Christianity today, it does not concede what cannot be conceded. The tone is honest, but not defeatist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信