“无人掉队”:数据登记在辅助生殖技术中的作用

S. Dyer, F. Zegers‐Hochschild
{"title":"“无人掉队”:数据登记在辅助生殖技术中的作用","authors":"S. Dyer, F. Zegers‐Hochschild","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“The freedom for all to live a flourishing life” is the big vision that underpins world-wide action and advocacy for human development. High-level global strategies, including the Sustainable Development Goals and United Nations Human Development Report, present plans of action that “nobody is left behind”. Central to living a flourishing life is the freedom and human right to found a family and have children. In the case of infertility, nobody is left behind if thosewhowish to access care have the freedom to do so; and, beyond access, find evidence-based treatment with a transparent track-record pertaining to outcomes. One of the international markers used to reflect access to infertility care is the number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles per million inhabitants. Although numbers mean different things in different communities, it has been accepted that access is met if 3000 couples per million population undergoART per annum. This estimate is derived from an algorithm which considers infertility prevalence, non-ART pregnancies as well as treatment-independent pregnancies. However, it must be stated that the demand for treatment can be reduced to half of this theoretical need. Many factors are responsible, such as the influence of religion, as well as cultural and educational factors. Qualitatively, the freedom to access infertility care is met if interventions are available, affordable and acceptable. Affordability pertains to the ability of the individual or the society to pay for the intervention without incurring undue financial risks or harm. Availability comprises physical presence of facilities and interventions within reach of consumers. Acceptability implies that an intervention is acceptable to the patient and vice versa. In all of these domains, visible and invisible biases exist. In many health systems, poverty creates prominent and visible barriers in the affordability domain—and often similarly prominent but less visible barriers in the acceptability domain.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Nobody left behind”: the role of data registries in assisted reproductive technology\",\"authors\":\"S. Dyer, F. Zegers‐Hochschild\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“The freedom for all to live a flourishing life” is the big vision that underpins world-wide action and advocacy for human development. High-level global strategies, including the Sustainable Development Goals and United Nations Human Development Report, present plans of action that “nobody is left behind”. Central to living a flourishing life is the freedom and human right to found a family and have children. In the case of infertility, nobody is left behind if thosewhowish to access care have the freedom to do so; and, beyond access, find evidence-based treatment with a transparent track-record pertaining to outcomes. One of the international markers used to reflect access to infertility care is the number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles per million inhabitants. Although numbers mean different things in different communities, it has been accepted that access is met if 3000 couples per million population undergoART per annum. This estimate is derived from an algorithm which considers infertility prevalence, non-ART pregnancies as well as treatment-independent pregnancies. However, it must be stated that the demand for treatment can be reduced to half of this theoretical need. Many factors are responsible, such as the influence of religion, as well as cultural and educational factors. Qualitatively, the freedom to access infertility care is met if interventions are available, affordable and acceptable. Affordability pertains to the ability of the individual or the society to pay for the intervention without incurring undue financial risks or harm. Availability comprises physical presence of facilities and interventions within reach of consumers. Acceptability implies that an intervention is acceptable to the patient and vice versa. In all of these domains, visible and invisible biases exist. In many health systems, poverty creates prominent and visible barriers in the affordability domain—and often similarly prominent but less visible barriers in the acceptability domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global reproductive health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“让所有人都能自由地过上繁荣的生活”是全世界行动和倡导人类发展的大愿景。包括《可持续发展目标》和《联合国人类发展报告》在内的高级别全球战略提出了“不让任何人掉队”的行动计划。繁荣生活的核心是建立家庭和生育子女的自由和人权。在不孕不育的情况下,如果那些能够获得护理的人有这样做的自由,就不会有人掉队;除此之外,还可以找到与结果相关的有透明记录的循证治疗方法。用于反映获得不孕不育护理的国际标志之一是每百万居民的辅助生殖技术周期数。尽管数字在不同的社区意味着不同的东西,但人们普遍认为,如果每年每百万人口中有3000对夫妇接受抗逆转录病毒疗法,就可以获得治疗。这一估计是根据一种算法得出的,该算法考虑了不孕不育率、非ART妊娠以及独立治疗妊娠。然而,必须指出的是,治疗需求可以减少到这一理论需求的一半。许多因素都有责任,例如宗教的影响,以及文化和教育因素。从质量上讲,如果干预措施是可用的、负担得起的和可接受的,那么获得不孕不育护理的自由就得到了满足。可承受性是指个人或社会在不产生不当财务风险或伤害的情况下为干预支付费用的能力。可用性包括设施的实际存在和消费者能够接触到的干预措施。可接受性意味着干预措施对患者是可接受的,反之亦然。在所有这些领域中,都存在可见和不可见的偏见。在许多卫生系统中,贫困在可负担性领域造成了突出而明显的障碍,在可接受性领域也往往造成了同样突出但不太明显的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Nobody left behind”: the role of data registries in assisted reproductive technology
“The freedom for all to live a flourishing life” is the big vision that underpins world-wide action and advocacy for human development. High-level global strategies, including the Sustainable Development Goals and United Nations Human Development Report, present plans of action that “nobody is left behind”. Central to living a flourishing life is the freedom and human right to found a family and have children. In the case of infertility, nobody is left behind if thosewhowish to access care have the freedom to do so; and, beyond access, find evidence-based treatment with a transparent track-record pertaining to outcomes. One of the international markers used to reflect access to infertility care is the number of assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles per million inhabitants. Although numbers mean different things in different communities, it has been accepted that access is met if 3000 couples per million population undergoART per annum. This estimate is derived from an algorithm which considers infertility prevalence, non-ART pregnancies as well as treatment-independent pregnancies. However, it must be stated that the demand for treatment can be reduced to half of this theoretical need. Many factors are responsible, such as the influence of religion, as well as cultural and educational factors. Qualitatively, the freedom to access infertility care is met if interventions are available, affordable and acceptable. Affordability pertains to the ability of the individual or the society to pay for the intervention without incurring undue financial risks or harm. Availability comprises physical presence of facilities and interventions within reach of consumers. Acceptability implies that an intervention is acceptable to the patient and vice versa. In all of these domains, visible and invisible biases exist. In many health systems, poverty creates prominent and visible barriers in the affordability domain—and often similarly prominent but less visible barriers in the acceptability domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信