Aoife K. Pitts, B. Trost, Nathaniel Trost, Benjamin Hand, Jared D. Margulies
{"title":"废除生态学是一颗种子炸弹","authors":"Aoife K. Pitts, B. Trost, Nathaniel Trost, Benjamin Hand, Jared D. Margulies","doi":"10.2458/jpe.4715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout a semester-long introduction to the field of political ecology, our class turned to Paul Robbin's notion of the \"hatchet\" and the \"seed\" to categorize the goals of the field. Exploring this metaphor through political ecology's past and present in 2021, we felt compelled to consider its full potential within an expanded view of how racial capitalism fundamentally structures socio-environmental relations. The hatchet points to political ecology's commitment to dismantling systems of oppression embedded in racial capitalism while the seed suggests the constructive pursuit of freedom, sustainability, and care within and for destroyed, forgotten, and embattled spaces left in capitalism's wake. After reading a series of case studies, we felt that our hatchets had been well-sharpened and our eyes attuned to the structural inequities not only in the geographically diverse locales we had read about, but also in our own state, our town, and our university. As the semester would to a close, we read a series of interventions entwining the Black Radical Tradition and abolition with political ecology and found ourselves with a new sense of political ecology's ability to not only diagnose inequities and harms, but to propose and enact novel interventions. The ideas we explored through works of authors such as Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Nik Heynen, Megan Ybarra, and Malini Ranganathan resonated with us as cutting and vital critiques, helping us to imagine abolition within situated ecologies. To expand on Robinson's \"hatchet\" and \"seed,\" we propose the \"seed bomb\" as a useful tool for thinking about the way that abolition ecologies intervene in, and destabilize, existing political-ecological regimes. ","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolition Ecology is a Seed Bomb\",\"authors\":\"Aoife K. Pitts, B. Trost, Nathaniel Trost, Benjamin Hand, Jared D. Margulies\",\"doi\":\"10.2458/jpe.4715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Throughout a semester-long introduction to the field of political ecology, our class turned to Paul Robbin's notion of the \\\"hatchet\\\" and the \\\"seed\\\" to categorize the goals of the field. Exploring this metaphor through political ecology's past and present in 2021, we felt compelled to consider its full potential within an expanded view of how racial capitalism fundamentally structures socio-environmental relations. The hatchet points to political ecology's commitment to dismantling systems of oppression embedded in racial capitalism while the seed suggests the constructive pursuit of freedom, sustainability, and care within and for destroyed, forgotten, and embattled spaces left in capitalism's wake. After reading a series of case studies, we felt that our hatchets had been well-sharpened and our eyes attuned to the structural inequities not only in the geographically diverse locales we had read about, but also in our own state, our town, and our university. As the semester would to a close, we read a series of interventions entwining the Black Radical Tradition and abolition with political ecology and found ourselves with a new sense of political ecology's ability to not only diagnose inequities and harms, but to propose and enact novel interventions. The ideas we explored through works of authors such as Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Nik Heynen, Megan Ybarra, and Malini Ranganathan resonated with us as cutting and vital critiques, helping us to imagine abolition within situated ecologies. To expand on Robinson's \\\"hatchet\\\" and \\\"seed,\\\" we propose the \\\"seed bomb\\\" as a useful tool for thinking about the way that abolition ecologies intervene in, and destabilize, existing political-ecological regimes. \",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.4715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.4715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在对政治生态学领域长达一个学期的介绍中,我们班转向保罗·罗宾的“斧头”和“种子”的概念来对该领域的目标进行分类。通过2021年政治生态学的过去和现在来探索这个隐喻,我们感到有必要在种族资本主义如何从根本上构建社会环境关系的扩展视图中考虑其全部潜力。斧头指向政治生态学致力于拆除种族资本主义中嵌入的压迫制度,而种子则暗示着对自由、可持续性的建设性追求,以及对资本主义留下的被破坏、被遗忘和被包围的空间的关心。在阅读了一系列的案例研究后,我们觉得我们的斧头已经磨得很锋利了,我们的眼睛已经适应了结构性的不平等,不仅在我们所读到的地理上不同的地方,而且在我们自己的州,我们的城镇和我们的大学。在学期即将结束时,我们阅读了一系列将黑人激进传统和废奴隶制与政治生态学相结合的干预措施,并发现自己对政治生态学的能力有了新的认识,不仅可以诊断不平等和危害,还可以提出和制定新的干预措施。我们通过Ruth Wilson Gilmore、Nik Heynen、Megan Ybarra和Malini Ranganathan等作家的作品探索的思想与我们产生了共鸣,这些思想是尖锐而重要的批评,帮助我们想象在现有生态中废除奴隶制。为了扩展罗宾逊的“斧头”和“种子”,我们提出“种子炸弹”作为一种有用的工具,用于思考废除生态学干预和破坏现有政治生态制度的方式。
Throughout a semester-long introduction to the field of political ecology, our class turned to Paul Robbin's notion of the "hatchet" and the "seed" to categorize the goals of the field. Exploring this metaphor through political ecology's past and present in 2021, we felt compelled to consider its full potential within an expanded view of how racial capitalism fundamentally structures socio-environmental relations. The hatchet points to political ecology's commitment to dismantling systems of oppression embedded in racial capitalism while the seed suggests the constructive pursuit of freedom, sustainability, and care within and for destroyed, forgotten, and embattled spaces left in capitalism's wake. After reading a series of case studies, we felt that our hatchets had been well-sharpened and our eyes attuned to the structural inequities not only in the geographically diverse locales we had read about, but also in our own state, our town, and our university. As the semester would to a close, we read a series of interventions entwining the Black Radical Tradition and abolition with political ecology and found ourselves with a new sense of political ecology's ability to not only diagnose inequities and harms, but to propose and enact novel interventions. The ideas we explored through works of authors such as Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Nik Heynen, Megan Ybarra, and Malini Ranganathan resonated with us as cutting and vital critiques, helping us to imagine abolition within situated ecologies. To expand on Robinson's "hatchet" and "seed," we propose the "seed bomb" as a useful tool for thinking about the way that abolition ecologies intervene in, and destabilize, existing political-ecological regimes.