冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的图像质量:冠状动脉可见性的定性和定量评估

S. Shamsul, A. Sabarudin, H. Abdul Hamid, N. Abu Bakar, M. Oteh, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim
{"title":"冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的图像质量:冠状动脉可见性的定性和定量评估","authors":"S. Shamsul, A. Sabarudin, H. Abdul Hamid, N. Abu Bakar, M. Oteh, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim","doi":"10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice scanner. Advancement of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology with higher spatial, temporal resolution, and increasing detector array have improved the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA. A total of 25 patients (12 men and 13 women) underwent CCTA was chosen and data was acquired by 640-slice scanner. All 16 segments of coronary arteries were evaluated by two reviewers using a 4-likert scale for qualitative assessment. In quantitative assessment, the evaluation of 4 main coronary arteries were analysed in terms of signal intensity (SI), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All 25 patients with a mean age of 52.88 ± 14.75 years old and body mass index (BMI) of 24.24 ± 3.28 kg/m 2 were analysed. In qualitative assessment, from the total of 400 segments, 379 segments (95 %) have diagnostic value while 21 segments do not have diagnostic value, which means 5 % artefact was detected. In quantitative assessment, there was no statistical differences in gender, race, and BMI ( p >0.05). Overall evaluation showed that higher SI at the left main artery (LM) at 393.7 ± 47.19. Image noise was higher at right coronary artery (RCA) at 39.01 ± 13.97. SNR and CNR showed higher at left anterior descending (LAD) with 12.73 ± 5.17 and LM 9.14 ± 4.2, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that 640-slice MDCT has higher diagnostic value in CCTA examination with 95 % vessel visibility with 5 % artefact detection. Keywords: CCTA, 640-slice scanner, coronary arteries, MDCT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","PeriodicalId":17686,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice Scanner: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Coronary Arteries Visibility\",\"authors\":\"S. Shamsul, A. Sabarudin, H. Abdul Hamid, N. Abu Bakar, M. Oteh, Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice scanner. Advancement of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology with higher spatial, temporal resolution, and increasing detector array have improved the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA. A total of 25 patients (12 men and 13 women) underwent CCTA was chosen and data was acquired by 640-slice scanner. All 16 segments of coronary arteries were evaluated by two reviewers using a 4-likert scale for qualitative assessment. In quantitative assessment, the evaluation of 4 main coronary arteries were analysed in terms of signal intensity (SI), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All 25 patients with a mean age of 52.88 ± 14.75 years old and body mass index (BMI) of 24.24 ± 3.28 kg/m 2 were analysed. In qualitative assessment, from the total of 400 segments, 379 segments (95 %) have diagnostic value while 21 segments do not have diagnostic value, which means 5 % artefact was detected. In quantitative assessment, there was no statistical differences in gender, race, and BMI ( p >0.05). Overall evaluation showed that higher SI at the left main artery (LM) at 393.7 ± 47.19. Image noise was higher at right coronary artery (RCA) at 39.01 ± 13.97. SNR and CNR showed higher at left anterior descending (LAD) with 12.73 ± 5.17 and LM 9.14 ± 4.2, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that 640-slice MDCT has higher diagnostic value in CCTA examination with 95 % vessel visibility with 5 % artefact detection. Keywords: CCTA, 640-slice scanner, coronary arteries, MDCT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06\",\"PeriodicalId\":17686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估使用640层扫描仪进行冠状动脉计算机断层摄影血管造影术(CCTA)的图像质量和诊断准确性。多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)技术的进步,具有更高的空间、时间分辨率和不断增加的探测器阵列,提高了CCTA的图像质量和诊断准确性。共选择25名患者(12名男性和13名女性)接受CCTA,并通过640切片扫描仪获取数据。两名评审员使用4-likert量表对所有16段冠状动脉进行了定性评估。在定量评估中,根据信号强度(SI)、图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)对4条主要冠状动脉的评估进行了分析。对25例平均年龄52.88±14.75岁、体重指数24.24±3.28kg/m2的患者进行了分析。在定性评估中,在总共400个节段中,379个节段(95%)具有诊断价值,而21个节段没有诊断价值,这意味着检测到5%的伪影。在定量评估中,性别、种族和BMI没有统计学差异(p>0.05)。总体评估显示,左主干(LM)的SI较高,为393.7±47.19。右冠状动脉图像噪声较高,为39.01±13.97。左前降支的SNR和CNR分别为12.73±5.17和9.14±4.2。总之,本研究表明,640层MDCT在CCTA检查中具有更高的诊断价值,95%的血管可见性和5%的伪影检测。关键词:CCTA,640切片扫描仪,冠状动脉,MDCT DOI:https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image Quality of Coronary CT Angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice Scanner: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessments of Coronary Arteries Visibility
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 640-slice scanner. Advancement of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology with higher spatial, temporal resolution, and increasing detector array have improved the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA. A total of 25 patients (12 men and 13 women) underwent CCTA was chosen and data was acquired by 640-slice scanner. All 16 segments of coronary arteries were evaluated by two reviewers using a 4-likert scale for qualitative assessment. In quantitative assessment, the evaluation of 4 main coronary arteries were analysed in terms of signal intensity (SI), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). All 25 patients with a mean age of 52.88 ± 14.75 years old and body mass index (BMI) of 24.24 ± 3.28 kg/m 2 were analysed. In qualitative assessment, from the total of 400 segments, 379 segments (95 %) have diagnostic value while 21 segments do not have diagnostic value, which means 5 % artefact was detected. In quantitative assessment, there was no statistical differences in gender, race, and BMI ( p >0.05). Overall evaluation showed that higher SI at the left main artery (LM) at 393.7 ± 47.19. Image noise was higher at right coronary artery (RCA) at 39.01 ± 13.97. SNR and CNR showed higher at left anterior descending (LAD) with 12.73 ± 5.17 and LM 9.14 ± 4.2, respectively. In conclusion, this study indicates that 640-slice MDCT has higher diagnostic value in CCTA examination with 95 % vessel visibility with 5 % artefact detection. Keywords: CCTA, 640-slice scanner, coronary arteries, MDCT DOI: https://doi.org/10.17576/jskm-2020-1802-06
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信