影响风电预测精度的因素研究——以立陶宛西部为例

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Giedrius Gecevičius, Mantas Marčiukaitis, M. Tamašauskienė
{"title":"影响风电预测精度的因素研究——以立陶宛西部为例","authors":"Giedrius Gecevičius, Mantas Marčiukaitis, M. Tamašauskienė","doi":"10.6001/ENERGETIKA.V65I1.3978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to mitigate climate change, more attention every year is being given to wind energy. However, despite minimal impact of wind turbines on the environment, there is a negative side as well. Wind speed variations are a stochastic process, and it is difficult to predict wind power accurately. Therefore, unpredictable power can disbalance the power grid; besides, huge power reserves are necessary. Wind energy can be forecasted based on statistical, physical or hybrid methods and models. However, all methods and models generate power prediction errors during different time horizons. The paper presents an analysis of wind power prediction errors determining factors based on statistical, physical and hybrid approaches. Investigation revealed that combination of statistical methods – nonlinear regression, model output statistics, the most suitable power curve and wind speed correction methods – reduced wind power prediction errors up to 1.5%. A detailed evaluation of relief variations and surface roughness increased wind power accuracy by 2%. Considering the local conditions of the western part of Lithuania, the best suitable tool for a short-term wind power prediction is a hybrid model including a detailed description of topographical conditions and the most precise statistical methods.","PeriodicalId":35639,"journal":{"name":"Energetika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The investigation of factors determining wind power prediction accuracy: case study of western Lithuania\",\"authors\":\"Giedrius Gecevičius, Mantas Marčiukaitis, M. Tamašauskienė\",\"doi\":\"10.6001/ENERGETIKA.V65I1.3978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to mitigate climate change, more attention every year is being given to wind energy. However, despite minimal impact of wind turbines on the environment, there is a negative side as well. Wind speed variations are a stochastic process, and it is difficult to predict wind power accurately. Therefore, unpredictable power can disbalance the power grid; besides, huge power reserves are necessary. Wind energy can be forecasted based on statistical, physical or hybrid methods and models. However, all methods and models generate power prediction errors during different time horizons. The paper presents an analysis of wind power prediction errors determining factors based on statistical, physical and hybrid approaches. Investigation revealed that combination of statistical methods – nonlinear regression, model output statistics, the most suitable power curve and wind speed correction methods – reduced wind power prediction errors up to 1.5%. A detailed evaluation of relief variations and surface roughness increased wind power accuracy by 2%. Considering the local conditions of the western part of Lithuania, the best suitable tool for a short-term wind power prediction is a hybrid model including a detailed description of topographical conditions and the most precise statistical methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energetika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energetika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6001/ENERGETIKA.V65I1.3978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energetika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6001/ENERGETIKA.V65I1.3978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了减缓气候变化,风能每年都受到更多的关注。然而,尽管风力涡轮机对环境的影响很小,但也有消极的一面。风速变化是一个随机过程,难以准确预测风力。因此,不可预测的功率会使电网失去平衡;此外,巨大的电力储备是必要的。风能可以根据统计、物理或混合方法和模型进行预测。然而,所有的方法和模型都会在不同的时间范围内产生功率预测误差。本文从统计、物理和混合三种方法对风电预测误差的影响因素进行了分析。调查发现,结合非线性回归、模型输出统计、最适功率曲线和风速修正等统计方法,可将风电预测误差降低至1.5%。地形变化和表面粗糙度的详细评估使风力发电精度提高了2%。考虑到立陶宛西部的当地条件,最适合短期风电预测的工具是混合模型,包括地形条件的详细描述和最精确的统计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The investigation of factors determining wind power prediction accuracy: case study of western Lithuania
In order to mitigate climate change, more attention every year is being given to wind energy. However, despite minimal impact of wind turbines on the environment, there is a negative side as well. Wind speed variations are a stochastic process, and it is difficult to predict wind power accurately. Therefore, unpredictable power can disbalance the power grid; besides, huge power reserves are necessary. Wind energy can be forecasted based on statistical, physical or hybrid methods and models. However, all methods and models generate power prediction errors during different time horizons. The paper presents an analysis of wind power prediction errors determining factors based on statistical, physical and hybrid approaches. Investigation revealed that combination of statistical methods – nonlinear regression, model output statistics, the most suitable power curve and wind speed correction methods – reduced wind power prediction errors up to 1.5%. A detailed evaluation of relief variations and surface roughness increased wind power accuracy by 2%. Considering the local conditions of the western part of Lithuania, the best suitable tool for a short-term wind power prediction is a hybrid model including a detailed description of topographical conditions and the most precise statistical methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energetika
Energetika Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original scientific, review and problem papers in the following fields: power engineering economics, modelling of energy systems, their management and optimi­zation, target systems, environmental impacts of power engi­neering objects, nuclear energetics, its safety, radioactive waste disposal, renewable power sources, power engineering metro­logy, thermal physics, aerohydrodynamics, plasma technologies, combustion processes, hydrogen energetics, material studies and technologies, hydrology, hydroenergetics. All papers are re­viewed. Information is presented on the defended theses, vari­ous conferences, reviews, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信