批判性参与:高等教育中黑人男性教师领导力的经验教训及其对人力资源开发的启示

IF 3.1 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Sherman Henry
{"title":"批判性参与:高等教育中黑人男性教师领导力的经验教训及其对人力资源开发的启示","authors":"Sherman Henry","doi":"10.1177/15234223211037750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Problem Limited discussions of the Black male as a leader has taken place in the human resource development literature. Hence, racialization, the process of constructing and attaching meaning to racial identity, is an under-studied topic. Further problematic, traditional leadership theories advance a race-neutral, universalized mainstream view of leaders, and do not consider the multiple ways that race changes the master narrative. A direct result of this shortcoming is the lack of research and theories that inform the experiences of Black males in Historical White Institutions (HWIs). The Solution In this article, an autoethnography approach is used to counter the master narrative that has concealed the everyday, lived experience of Black males in higher education faculty and leadership roles. Critical race theory is applied as a framework for viewing lived experience as a legitimate and appropriate source of analysis. Socio-cultural theory is used to explain how cultural competence is needed to appropriately identify racism as an enduring problem that is a product of its culture and environment. The Stakeholders HRD faculty, HWIs administrators, hiring committees, diversity, equity and inclusion practitioners, search committees, and Black males in faculty roles in HWIs.","PeriodicalId":51549,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Developing Human Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Engagement: Lessons Learned and Implications for HRD About Black Male Faculty Leadership in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Sherman Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15234223211037750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Problem Limited discussions of the Black male as a leader has taken place in the human resource development literature. Hence, racialization, the process of constructing and attaching meaning to racial identity, is an under-studied topic. Further problematic, traditional leadership theories advance a race-neutral, universalized mainstream view of leaders, and do not consider the multiple ways that race changes the master narrative. A direct result of this shortcoming is the lack of research and theories that inform the experiences of Black males in Historical White Institutions (HWIs). The Solution In this article, an autoethnography approach is used to counter the master narrative that has concealed the everyday, lived experience of Black males in higher education faculty and leadership roles. Critical race theory is applied as a framework for viewing lived experience as a legitimate and appropriate source of analysis. Socio-cultural theory is used to explain how cultural competence is needed to appropriately identify racism as an enduring problem that is a product of its culture and environment. The Stakeholders HRD faculty, HWIs administrators, hiring committees, diversity, equity and inclusion practitioners, search committees, and Black males in faculty roles in HWIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Developing Human Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Developing Human Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223211037750\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Developing Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223211037750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

问题有限的讨论黑人男性作为一个领导者已经发生在人力资源开发文献。因此,种族化,即构建和赋予种族身份意义的过程,是一个有待研究的课题。更有问题的是,传统的领导理论提出了一种种族中立的、普遍的领导者主流观点,并没有考虑种族改变主流叙事的多种方式。这一缺陷的直接结果是缺乏研究和理论来告知黑人男性在历史白人机构(hwi)的经历。在这篇文章中,一种自我民族志的方法被用来对抗隐藏了黑人男性在高等教育教师和领导角色中的日常生活经历的主要叙述。批判性种族理论被用作一个框架,将生活经验视为合法和适当的分析来源。社会文化理论用来解释如何需要文化能力来适当地识别种族主义作为其文化和环境产物的持久问题。人力资源开发教师、人力资源管理机构管理人员、招聘委员会、多元化、公平和包容从业者、搜索委员会和在人力资源管理机构担任教职的黑人男性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Engagement: Lessons Learned and Implications for HRD About Black Male Faculty Leadership in Higher Education
The Problem Limited discussions of the Black male as a leader has taken place in the human resource development literature. Hence, racialization, the process of constructing and attaching meaning to racial identity, is an under-studied topic. Further problematic, traditional leadership theories advance a race-neutral, universalized mainstream view of leaders, and do not consider the multiple ways that race changes the master narrative. A direct result of this shortcoming is the lack of research and theories that inform the experiences of Black males in Historical White Institutions (HWIs). The Solution In this article, an autoethnography approach is used to counter the master narrative that has concealed the everyday, lived experience of Black males in higher education faculty and leadership roles. Critical race theory is applied as a framework for viewing lived experience as a legitimate and appropriate source of analysis. Socio-cultural theory is used to explain how cultural competence is needed to appropriately identify racism as an enduring problem that is a product of its culture and environment. The Stakeholders HRD faculty, HWIs administrators, hiring committees, diversity, equity and inclusion practitioners, search committees, and Black males in faculty roles in HWIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Developing Human Resources
Advances in Developing Human Resources INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Advances in Developing Human Resources is a bi-monthly journal whose single issues explore and examine discrete topics. These single issues (or "back issues," once the subsequent issue is published) are available individually or in quantities for use in a classroom or training environment. Balancing practice, theory, and readability, each issue is devoted to important and timely topics related to the development of human resources. The content of the journal spans the realms of performance, learning, and integrity within an organizational context. Readable and relevant to practitioners, each issue is grounded in sound research and theory and edited by a top scholar in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信