{"title":"帖撒罗尼迦前书2:13 -16的真实性:论证回顾","authors":"Matthew D. Jensen","doi":"10.1177/1476993X19860671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theological. After this, a briefer second section outlines the four arguments defending the authenticity of the verses: textual, contextual, traditional, and rhetorical.","PeriodicalId":43066,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Biblical Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"59 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476993X19860671","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The (In)authenticity of 1 Thessalonians 2.13-16: A Review of Arguments\",\"authors\":\"Matthew D. Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1476993X19860671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theological. After this, a briefer second section outlines the four arguments defending the authenticity of the verses: textual, contextual, traditional, and rhetorical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Currents in Biblical Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"59 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476993X19860671\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Currents in Biblical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X19860671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Biblical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476993X19860671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The (In)authenticity of 1 Thessalonians 2.13-16: A Review of Arguments
This article critically reviews the arguments for and against the view that 1 Thess. 2.13-16 is a post-Pauline interpolation. It starts with the four arguments that are forwarded to promote the view that it is an interpolation: form-critical/literary, grammatical/syntactical, historical, and theological. After this, a briefer second section outlines the four arguments defending the authenticity of the verses: textual, contextual, traditional, and rhetorical.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
