NLP模型中解释价值的维度

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Kees van Deemter
{"title":"NLP模型中解释价值的维度","authors":"Kees van Deemter","doi":"10.1162/coli_a_00480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Performance on a dataset is often regarded as the key criterion for assessing NLP models. I will argue for a broader perspective, which emphasizes scientific explanation. I will draw on a long tradition in the philosophy of science, and on the Bayesian approach to assessing scientific theories, to argue for a plurality of criteria for assessing NLP models. To illustrate these ideas, I will compare some recent models of language production with each other. I conclude by asking what it would mean for institutional policies if the NLP community took these ideas onboard.","PeriodicalId":55229,"journal":{"name":"Computational Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dimensions of Explanatory Value in NLP models\",\"authors\":\"Kees van Deemter\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/coli_a_00480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Performance on a dataset is often regarded as the key criterion for assessing NLP models. I will argue for a broader perspective, which emphasizes scientific explanation. I will draw on a long tradition in the philosophy of science, and on the Bayesian approach to assessing scientific theories, to argue for a plurality of criteria for assessing NLP models. To illustrate these ideas, I will compare some recent models of language production with each other. I conclude by asking what it would mean for institutional policies if the NLP community took these ideas onboard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00480\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数据集的性能通常被视为评估NLP模型的关键标准。我将主张更广泛的视角,强调科学的解释。我将借鉴科学哲学的悠久传统,以及评估科学理论的贝叶斯方法,为评估NLP模型提出多种标准。为了说明这些观点,我将比较一些最近的语言生产模型。最后,我想问一下,如果NLP社区采纳这些想法,对体制政策意味着什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dimensions of Explanatory Value in NLP models
Performance on a dataset is often regarded as the key criterion for assessing NLP models. I will argue for a broader perspective, which emphasizes scientific explanation. I will draw on a long tradition in the philosophy of science, and on the Bayesian approach to assessing scientific theories, to argue for a plurality of criteria for assessing NLP models. To illustrate these ideas, I will compare some recent models of language production with each other. I conclude by asking what it would mean for institutional policies if the NLP community took these ideas onboard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Linguistics
Computational Linguistics 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational Linguistics, the longest-running publication dedicated solely to the computational and mathematical aspects of language and the design of natural language processing systems, provides university and industry linguists, computational linguists, AI and machine learning researchers, cognitive scientists, speech specialists, and philosophers with the latest insights into the computational aspects of language research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信