看到手势是减轻还是增加负荷?

IF 0.7 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Gesture Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI:10.1075/GEST.17017.HOS
Autumn B. Hostetter, Stuart H. Murch, Lyla Rothschild, Cierra S. Gillard
{"title":"看到手势是减轻还是增加负荷?","authors":"Autumn B. Hostetter, Stuart H. Murch, Lyla Rothschild, Cierra S. Gillard","doi":"10.1075/GEST.17017.HOS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We examined the cognitive resources\n involved in processing speech with gesture compared to the same speech without\n gesture across four studies using a dual-task paradigm. Participants viewed videos of a woman describing\n spatial arrays either with gesture or without. They then attempted to choose the\n target array from among four choices. Participants’ cognitive load was measured\n as they completed this comprehension task by measuring how well they could\n remember the location and identity of digits in a secondary task. We found that addressees experience additional visuospatial load when processing gestures compared to speech alone, and that the load primarily comes when addressees attempt to use their memory of the descriptions with gesture to choose the target array. However,\n this cost only occurs when gestures about horizontal spatial relations (i.e.,\n left and right) are produced from the speaker’s egocentric perspective.","PeriodicalId":35125,"journal":{"name":"Gesture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does seeing gesture lighten or increase the\\n load?\",\"authors\":\"Autumn B. Hostetter, Stuart H. Murch, Lyla Rothschild, Cierra S. Gillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/GEST.17017.HOS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We examined the cognitive resources\\n involved in processing speech with gesture compared to the same speech without\\n gesture across four studies using a dual-task paradigm. Participants viewed videos of a woman describing\\n spatial arrays either with gesture or without. They then attempted to choose the\\n target array from among four choices. Participants’ cognitive load was measured\\n as they completed this comprehension task by measuring how well they could\\n remember the location and identity of digits in a secondary task. We found that addressees experience additional visuospatial load when processing gestures compared to speech alone, and that the load primarily comes when addressees attempt to use their memory of the descriptions with gesture to choose the target array. However,\\n this cost only occurs when gestures about horizontal spatial relations (i.e.,\\n left and right) are produced from the speaker’s egocentric perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gesture\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gesture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/GEST.17017.HOS\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/GEST.17017.HOS","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们使用双任务范式在四项研究中检查了处理有手势的语音与处理没有手势的语音所涉及的认知资源。参与者观看了一名女性用手势或不用手势描述空间阵列的视频。然后,他们试图从四个选项中选择目标阵列。参与者在完成这项理解任务时的认知负荷是通过测量他们在第二项任务中对数字的位置和身份的记忆程度来测量的。我们发现,与单独处理语音相比,收件人在处理手势时会经历额外的视觉空间负荷,而这种负荷主要发生在收件人试图利用他们对手势描述的记忆来选择目标阵列时。然而,只有当从说话者的自我中心角度产生关于水平空间关系(即左右)的手势时,才会发生这种成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does seeing gesture lighten or increase the load?
We examined the cognitive resources involved in processing speech with gesture compared to the same speech without gesture across four studies using a dual-task paradigm. Participants viewed videos of a woman describing spatial arrays either with gesture or without. They then attempted to choose the target array from among four choices. Participants’ cognitive load was measured as they completed this comprehension task by measuring how well they could remember the location and identity of digits in a secondary task. We found that addressees experience additional visuospatial load when processing gestures compared to speech alone, and that the load primarily comes when addressees attempt to use their memory of the descriptions with gesture to choose the target array. However, this cost only occurs when gestures about horizontal spatial relations (i.e., left and right) are produced from the speaker’s egocentric perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gesture
Gesture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Gesture publishes articles reporting original research, as well as survey and review articles, on all aspects of gesture. The journal aims to stimulate and facilitate scholarly communication between the different disciplines within which work on gesture is conducted. For this reason papers written in the spirit of cooperation between disciplines are especially encouraged. Topics may include, but are by no means limited to: the relationship between gesture and speech; the role gesture may play in communication in all the circumstances of social interaction, including conversations, the work-place or instructional settings; gesture and cognition; the development of gesture in children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信