{"title":"艾斯·艾辛加来过","authors":"Sieger Vreeling","doi":"10.48003/knob.121.2022.2.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1774 and 1781, Eise Eisinga built an orrery in his house in Franeker. This instrument was and is commonly referred to as a planetarium, although it also gives information about the sun, the moon and the main constellations. I use the term ‘instrument’ for the machinery above the ‘planetarium room’ and the boxbed together with the dials on the ceiling and the wall containing the box-bed (bedsteewand). I use the term ‘Planetarium’ for the institution, that is the building with everything in it. The machinery, the ceiling, and the bedsteewand have been nominated for UNESCO world heritage status this year. \nThe aim of this article is to discuss the authenticity of the Planetarium: which parts are authentic – that is, from the time of Eisinga – which have been altered, and how were any alterations supervised? The article concentrates on the period around 1900, when the conservation of monuments had just been institutionalized, but the general principle of preferring ‘preservation over alteration’ had not yet been widely accepted. The primary sources are the annual reports on the state of maintenance by government architect Jacobus van Lokhorst. \nEisinga had sold the Planetarium to the national government in 1826. In order to save money, the government gave it to the municipality of Franeker in 1859. When it was suspected that the municipality was not meeting the first condition of the agreement – to maintain the instrument at all times – Van Lokhorst was tasked with the supervision of the Planetarium by the Minister of the Interior in 1882. \nWe know that the instrument was repaired a couple of times, but the exact nature of the alterations is unknown, because Van Lokhorst barely mentions them in his reports. He had to leave the supervision of the instrument to the caretaker and a clockmaker, because he was out of his depth. The only parts of the ‘planetarium room’ that remained authentic around 1900 are the ceiling and the bedsteewand. After the instrument had come to a standstill several times, a stove had to be installed to decrease the humidity in the room. That is why in 1890 the windows were replaced to make room for a chimney. The rest of the room was turned into a period room on the advice of Van Lokhorst and with permission of the Minister of the Interior: the walls were whitewashed and, a year later, the floor was tiled. The tile wainscoting dates from 1895. \nThe conclusion is that the authenticity of the Planetarium decreased around 1900. This should not affect the UNESCO nomination. Repairs to the machinery were only to be expected, and the ceiling and the bedsteewand appear to be authentic. However, a world heritage site attracts more visitors, all of whom have to be facilitated. How will this affect the authenticity of the Planetarium in the future?","PeriodicalId":52053,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin KNOB","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eise Eisinga was here\",\"authors\":\"Sieger Vreeling\",\"doi\":\"10.48003/knob.121.2022.2.745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between 1774 and 1781, Eise Eisinga built an orrery in his house in Franeker. This instrument was and is commonly referred to as a planetarium, although it also gives information about the sun, the moon and the main constellations. I use the term ‘instrument’ for the machinery above the ‘planetarium room’ and the boxbed together with the dials on the ceiling and the wall containing the box-bed (bedsteewand). I use the term ‘Planetarium’ for the institution, that is the building with everything in it. The machinery, the ceiling, and the bedsteewand have been nominated for UNESCO world heritage status this year. \\nThe aim of this article is to discuss the authenticity of the Planetarium: which parts are authentic – that is, from the time of Eisinga – which have been altered, and how were any alterations supervised? The article concentrates on the period around 1900, when the conservation of monuments had just been institutionalized, but the general principle of preferring ‘preservation over alteration’ had not yet been widely accepted. The primary sources are the annual reports on the state of maintenance by government architect Jacobus van Lokhorst. \\nEisinga had sold the Planetarium to the national government in 1826. In order to save money, the government gave it to the municipality of Franeker in 1859. When it was suspected that the municipality was not meeting the first condition of the agreement – to maintain the instrument at all times – Van Lokhorst was tasked with the supervision of the Planetarium by the Minister of the Interior in 1882. \\nWe know that the instrument was repaired a couple of times, but the exact nature of the alterations is unknown, because Van Lokhorst barely mentions them in his reports. He had to leave the supervision of the instrument to the caretaker and a clockmaker, because he was out of his depth. The only parts of the ‘planetarium room’ that remained authentic around 1900 are the ceiling and the bedsteewand. After the instrument had come to a standstill several times, a stove had to be installed to decrease the humidity in the room. That is why in 1890 the windows were replaced to make room for a chimney. The rest of the room was turned into a period room on the advice of Van Lokhorst and with permission of the Minister of the Interior: the walls were whitewashed and, a year later, the floor was tiled. The tile wainscoting dates from 1895. \\nThe conclusion is that the authenticity of the Planetarium decreased around 1900. This should not affect the UNESCO nomination. Repairs to the machinery were only to be expected, and the ceiling and the bedsteewand appear to be authentic. However, a world heritage site attracts more visitors, all of whom have to be facilitated. How will this affect the authenticity of the Planetarium in the future?\",\"PeriodicalId\":52053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin KNOB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin KNOB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48003/knob.121.2022.2.745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin KNOB","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48003/knob.121.2022.2.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
1774年至1781年间,艾斯·艾辛加在他位于Franeker的家中建造了一座奥雷里。这种仪器过去和现在都被称为天文馆,尽管它也提供有关太阳、月亮和主要星座的信息。我用“仪器”一词来形容“天文馆室”和方舱床上方的机器,以及天花板上的刻度盘和装有方舱床的墙壁(床架)。我用“天文馆”这个词来形容这个机构,也就是说,里面有所有东西的建筑。机器、天花板和床架今年都被联合国教科文组织提名为世界遗产。这篇文章的目的是讨论天文馆的真实性:哪些部分是真实的——也就是说,从艾森加时代开始——哪些部分被修改了,以及如何监督任何修改?这篇文章集中于1900年左右的时期,当时纪念碑的保护刚刚制度化,但“保护胜于改造”的一般原则尚未被广泛接受。主要来源是政府建筑师Jacobus van Lokhorst关于维护状态的年度报告。1826年,艾森加将天文馆卖给了国家政府。为了省钱,政府于1859年将其交给了Franeker市。当怀疑市政当局不符合协议的第一个条件——始终维护该文书时,1882年,内政部长指派Van Lokhorst监督天文馆。我们知道该仪器被修复了几次,但这些改动的确切性质尚不清楚,因为Van Lokhorst在他的报告中几乎没有提到这些改动。他不得不把仪器的监督权交给管理员和钟表匠,因为他已经力不从心了。“天文馆房间”在1900年左右唯一保留下来的部分是天花板和床架。仪器几次停下来后,不得不安装一个炉子来降低房间里的湿度。这就是为什么在1890年,窗户被替换,为烟囱腾出空间。在Van Lokhorst的建议下,并在内政部长的许可下,房间的其余部分被改造成了一个时代房间:墙壁被粉刷过,一年后,地板被铺上了瓷砖。瓷砖墙裙建于1895年。结论是天文馆的真实性在1900年左右有所下降。这不应影响联合国教科文组织的提名。机器的维修只是意料之中的事,天花板和床架看起来都是真实的。然而,世界遗产地吸引了更多的游客,所有这些游客都必须得到便利。这将如何影响天文馆未来的真实性?
Between 1774 and 1781, Eise Eisinga built an orrery in his house in Franeker. This instrument was and is commonly referred to as a planetarium, although it also gives information about the sun, the moon and the main constellations. I use the term ‘instrument’ for the machinery above the ‘planetarium room’ and the boxbed together with the dials on the ceiling and the wall containing the box-bed (bedsteewand). I use the term ‘Planetarium’ for the institution, that is the building with everything in it. The machinery, the ceiling, and the bedsteewand have been nominated for UNESCO world heritage status this year.
The aim of this article is to discuss the authenticity of the Planetarium: which parts are authentic – that is, from the time of Eisinga – which have been altered, and how were any alterations supervised? The article concentrates on the period around 1900, when the conservation of monuments had just been institutionalized, but the general principle of preferring ‘preservation over alteration’ had not yet been widely accepted. The primary sources are the annual reports on the state of maintenance by government architect Jacobus van Lokhorst.
Eisinga had sold the Planetarium to the national government in 1826. In order to save money, the government gave it to the municipality of Franeker in 1859. When it was suspected that the municipality was not meeting the first condition of the agreement – to maintain the instrument at all times – Van Lokhorst was tasked with the supervision of the Planetarium by the Minister of the Interior in 1882.
We know that the instrument was repaired a couple of times, but the exact nature of the alterations is unknown, because Van Lokhorst barely mentions them in his reports. He had to leave the supervision of the instrument to the caretaker and a clockmaker, because he was out of his depth. The only parts of the ‘planetarium room’ that remained authentic around 1900 are the ceiling and the bedsteewand. After the instrument had come to a standstill several times, a stove had to be installed to decrease the humidity in the room. That is why in 1890 the windows were replaced to make room for a chimney. The rest of the room was turned into a period room on the advice of Van Lokhorst and with permission of the Minister of the Interior: the walls were whitewashed and, a year later, the floor was tiled. The tile wainscoting dates from 1895.
The conclusion is that the authenticity of the Planetarium decreased around 1900. This should not affect the UNESCO nomination. Repairs to the machinery were only to be expected, and the ceiling and the bedsteewand appear to be authentic. However, a world heritage site attracts more visitors, all of whom have to be facilitated. How will this affect the authenticity of the Planetarium in the future?