我是如何学会恨你的。回声室中的副社会互动及其溢出效应

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
R. Radu
{"title":"我是如何学会恨你的。回声室中的副社会互动及其溢出效应","authors":"R. Radu","doi":"10.17502/mrcs.v11i1.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the most influential posts on Facebook related to COVID-19, for the first two years of the pandemic, to explain how parasocial opinion leaders created echo chambers, in the Romanian public sphere, and to discuss the cumulative spillover effects these echo chambers had on society at large. A database of the 233,242 most influential posts in Romanian about COVID-19, from the first two years of the pandemic, is investigated using a mixed methods approach, to 1) verify statistically if issue-related echo chambers existed and 2) to describe, qualitatively, how they functioned. A special focus is devoted to trolling in the form of reactions to posts, such as haha reactions for messages about COVID-related deaths. Using the literature on parasocial interaction, inoculation theory, online disinhibition effect and echo chambers, the article shows how echo chambers supported trolling behavior, for radicalized Facebook users, how they polluted the public discussion and how they made dialog impossible for social groups that ended up identifying each other as the enemy. Based on these research results, the author proposes two policy recommendations for social platforms.","PeriodicalId":41104,"journal":{"name":"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How I learned to hate you. Parasocial interactions in echo chambers and their spillover effects\",\"authors\":\"R. Radu\",\"doi\":\"10.17502/mrcs.v11i1.598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the most influential posts on Facebook related to COVID-19, for the first two years of the pandemic, to explain how parasocial opinion leaders created echo chambers, in the Romanian public sphere, and to discuss the cumulative spillover effects these echo chambers had on society at large. A database of the 233,242 most influential posts in Romanian about COVID-19, from the first two years of the pandemic, is investigated using a mixed methods approach, to 1) verify statistically if issue-related echo chambers existed and 2) to describe, qualitatively, how they functioned. A special focus is devoted to trolling in the form of reactions to posts, such as haha reactions for messages about COVID-related deaths. Using the literature on parasocial interaction, inoculation theory, online disinhibition effect and echo chambers, the article shows how echo chambers supported trolling behavior, for radicalized Facebook users, how they polluted the public discussion and how they made dialog impossible for social groups that ended up identifying each other as the enemy. Based on these research results, the author proposes two policy recommendations for social platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i1.598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v11i1.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了疫情爆发头两年Facebook上与COVID-19相关的最具影响力的帖子,以解释社会舆论领袖如何在罗马尼亚公共领域创造“回声室”,并讨论这些“回声室”对整个社会的累积溢出效应。我们使用混合方法对一个数据库进行了调查,该数据库包含了从疫情爆发的头两年开始,在罗马尼亚发表的关于COVID-19的233,242篇最具影响力的帖子,目的是:1)从统计上验证是否存在与问题相关的回声室;2)定性地描述它们的运作方式。特别关注的是对帖子的反应形式的挑衅,例如对与covid相关的死亡消息的哈哈反应。这篇文章运用了关于副社会互动、接种理论、在线去抑制效应和回声室的文献,展示了回声室是如何支持煽动行为的,对于激进的Facebook用户来说,他们是如何污染公共讨论的,以及他们是如何使社会群体无法进行对话的,最终他们将彼此视为敌人。基于这些研究结果,笔者对社交平台提出了两点政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How I learned to hate you. Parasocial interactions in echo chambers and their spillover effects
This article analyzes the most influential posts on Facebook related to COVID-19, for the first two years of the pandemic, to explain how parasocial opinion leaders created echo chambers, in the Romanian public sphere, and to discuss the cumulative spillover effects these echo chambers had on society at large. A database of the 233,242 most influential posts in Romanian about COVID-19, from the first two years of the pandemic, is investigated using a mixed methods approach, to 1) verify statistically if issue-related echo chambers existed and 2) to describe, qualitatively, how they functioned. A special focus is devoted to trolling in the form of reactions to posts, such as haha reactions for messages about COVID-related deaths. Using the literature on parasocial interaction, inoculation theory, online disinhibition effect and echo chambers, the article shows how echo chambers supported trolling behavior, for radicalized Facebook users, how they polluted the public discussion and how they made dialog impossible for social groups that ended up identifying each other as the enemy. Based on these research results, the author proposes two policy recommendations for social platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信