囊性纤维化基因治疗临床试验的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析

Q4 Medicine
Ghaith M Al-Taani, A. Yehya
{"title":"囊性纤维化基因治疗临床试验的有效性和安全性:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Ghaith M Al-Taani, A. Yehya","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v56i2.236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundGene therapy has been proposed as a treatment approach for cystic fibrosis by replacing the single defective gene, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR), through topical lung delivery. Relatively few studies have addressed gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.Objectives Via referral to the published literature, this study aimed to identify any success of the gene therapy approach for cystic fibrosis regarding experimental and routine clinical outcomes in different drug development stages, and to determine any adverse effects noted. MethodologyA search of the PubMed database (NCBI) for 1989–2020 was made using predefined selection criteria for clinical trials on patients with cystic fibrosis receiving viral and non-viral lung delivery systems of the CFTR gene. Several features in the reviewed studies were examined, including clinical phase (1–3), sample size, delivery target cells/vector, and reported adverse effects. A quantitative estimate of treatment intervention success was evaluated using a meta-analysis approach.Results A total of 20 studies with 549 patients were included in the review. The studies involved the delivery of the defective gene to the lung, nasal mucosa, and sinuses, and were mainly phase 1–2, randomized controlled trials; there were no phase three studies. The vector for gene transfer was liposome or viral. % predicted FEV1 was statistically significant between intervention and control patients in two trials. Gene transfer was detected to a higher degree in intervention patients than control; this outcome measure was assessed using bronchoscopy assessment of vector-specific DNA and mRNA expression in lung and nasal mucosa. These effects, however, were temporary. The safety of the gene therapy approach was confirmed. ConclusionReportedly, the gene therapy approach is safe but has limited and temporary efficacy. Newer approaches should thus be engineered to deliver the necessary genetic material with the desired, full-scale efficacy.","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Safety of Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ghaith M Al-Taani, A. Yehya\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jmj.v56i2.236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundGene therapy has been proposed as a treatment approach for cystic fibrosis by replacing the single defective gene, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR), through topical lung delivery. Relatively few studies have addressed gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.Objectives Via referral to the published literature, this study aimed to identify any success of the gene therapy approach for cystic fibrosis regarding experimental and routine clinical outcomes in different drug development stages, and to determine any adverse effects noted. MethodologyA search of the PubMed database (NCBI) for 1989–2020 was made using predefined selection criteria for clinical trials on patients with cystic fibrosis receiving viral and non-viral lung delivery systems of the CFTR gene. Several features in the reviewed studies were examined, including clinical phase (1–3), sample size, delivery target cells/vector, and reported adverse effects. A quantitative estimate of treatment intervention success was evaluated using a meta-analysis approach.Results A total of 20 studies with 549 patients were included in the review. The studies involved the delivery of the defective gene to the lung, nasal mucosa, and sinuses, and were mainly phase 1–2, randomized controlled trials; there were no phase three studies. The vector for gene transfer was liposome or viral. % predicted FEV1 was statistically significant between intervention and control patients in two trials. Gene transfer was detected to a higher degree in intervention patients than control; this outcome measure was assessed using bronchoscopy assessment of vector-specific DNA and mRNA expression in lung and nasal mucosa. These effects, however, were temporary. The safety of the gene therapy approach was confirmed. ConclusionReportedly, the gene therapy approach is safe but has limited and temporary efficacy. Newer approaches should thus be engineered to deliver the necessary genetic material with the desired, full-scale efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i2.236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v56i2.236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景基因治疗已被提出作为一种治疗囊性纤维化的方法,通过局部肺给药取代单一缺陷基因,即囊性纤维化跨膜调节因子(CFTR)。相对而言,很少有研究涉及囊性纤维化的基因治疗。目的通过查阅已发表的文献,本研究旨在确定囊性纤维化基因治疗方法在不同药物开发阶段的实验和常规临床结果方面的任何成功之处,并确定任何注意到的不良反应。方法使用预先定义的选择标准搜索1989–2020年的PubMed数据库(NCBI),用于接受CFTR基因的病毒和非病毒肺部递送系统的囊性纤维化患者的临床试验。审查了审查研究中的几个特征,包括临床阶段(1-3)、样本量、递送靶细胞/载体和报告的不良反应。使用荟萃分析方法对治疗干预成功率的定量评估进行了评估。结果共纳入20项研究,涉及549名患者。这些研究涉及将缺陷基因输送到肺部、鼻粘膜和鼻窦,主要是1-2期随机对照试验;没有第三阶段的研究。用于基因转移的载体是脂质体或病毒。%在两项试验中,预测的FEV1在干预和对照患者之间具有统计学意义。干预组患者的基因转移程度高于对照组;使用支气管镜评估肺和鼻粘膜中载体特异性DNA和mRNA的表达来评估这一结果。然而,这些影响是暂时的。基因治疗方法的安全性得到了证实。结论据报道,基因治疗方法是安全的,但疗效有限且暂时。因此,应该设计更新的方法,以提供具有所需全面功效的必要遗传物质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy and Safety of Cystic Fibrosis Gene Therapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BackgroundGene therapy has been proposed as a treatment approach for cystic fibrosis by replacing the single defective gene, cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR), through topical lung delivery. Relatively few studies have addressed gene therapy for cystic fibrosis.Objectives Via referral to the published literature, this study aimed to identify any success of the gene therapy approach for cystic fibrosis regarding experimental and routine clinical outcomes in different drug development stages, and to determine any adverse effects noted. MethodologyA search of the PubMed database (NCBI) for 1989–2020 was made using predefined selection criteria for clinical trials on patients with cystic fibrosis receiving viral and non-viral lung delivery systems of the CFTR gene. Several features in the reviewed studies were examined, including clinical phase (1–3), sample size, delivery target cells/vector, and reported adverse effects. A quantitative estimate of treatment intervention success was evaluated using a meta-analysis approach.Results A total of 20 studies with 549 patients were included in the review. The studies involved the delivery of the defective gene to the lung, nasal mucosa, and sinuses, and were mainly phase 1–2, randomized controlled trials; there were no phase three studies. The vector for gene transfer was liposome or viral. % predicted FEV1 was statistically significant between intervention and control patients in two trials. Gene transfer was detected to a higher degree in intervention patients than control; this outcome measure was assessed using bronchoscopy assessment of vector-specific DNA and mRNA expression in lung and nasal mucosa. These effects, however, were temporary. The safety of the gene therapy approach was confirmed. ConclusionReportedly, the gene therapy approach is safe but has limited and temporary efficacy. Newer approaches should thus be engineered to deliver the necessary genetic material with the desired, full-scale efficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信