挤压法用几种包埋材料提高干酪乳杆菌和长双歧杆菌的活力

IF 0.3 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Widaningrum, Miskiyah, D. Indrasti, Hc Hidaya
{"title":"挤压法用几种包埋材料提高干酪乳杆菌和长双歧杆菌的活力","authors":"Widaningrum, Miskiyah, D. Indrasti, Hc Hidaya","doi":"10.14334/JITV.V23I4.1547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum are probiotics commonly applied as dry starter for food system. Drying process in the production of dry starter can reduce the number of probiotics, therefore they are necessary to be encapsulated. Aim of this research was to obtain best encapsulating material for both probiotics. Encapsulation technique used in this research was extrusion with maltodextrine-alginate, sago starch-alginate, corn starch-alginate, and control of treatment skim milk-alginate (w:w) as encapsulating materials.  The four encapsulating materials significantly affected the value of viability, encapsulation efficiency, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, number of survival cell during drying process, and number of survival encapsulated cell in simulated acid and bile salt conditions. Based on viability of L. casei and B. longum, beads matrix characteristic, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, and number of survival cells during drying process, maltodextrine-alginate was better than sago starch-alginate and corn starch-alginate, but was not as good as skim milk-alginate (control of treatment) as encapsulating material. Viability (number) of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of maltodextrine-alginate were 4.69±0.08 log CFU/g and 5.32±0.21 log CFU/g, while number of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of skim milk-alginate were higher 5.08±0.07 log CFU/g and 6.20±0.16 log CFU/g. L. casei more resistant than B. longum against acidic (low pH) environment. In the presence of 0.3% bile salt, L. casei and B. longum encapsulated with skim milk-alginate increased as much as 2.75±0. 02 and 1.61±0.04 log cycles, respectively.","PeriodicalId":17806,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improvement of Viability of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum with Several Encapsulating Materials using Extrusion Method\",\"authors\":\"Widaningrum, Miskiyah, D. Indrasti, Hc Hidaya\",\"doi\":\"10.14334/JITV.V23I4.1547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum are probiotics commonly applied as dry starter for food system. Drying process in the production of dry starter can reduce the number of probiotics, therefore they are necessary to be encapsulated. Aim of this research was to obtain best encapsulating material for both probiotics. Encapsulation technique used in this research was extrusion with maltodextrine-alginate, sago starch-alginate, corn starch-alginate, and control of treatment skim milk-alginate (w:w) as encapsulating materials.  The four encapsulating materials significantly affected the value of viability, encapsulation efficiency, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, number of survival cell during drying process, and number of survival encapsulated cell in simulated acid and bile salt conditions. Based on viability of L. casei and B. longum, beads matrix characteristic, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, and number of survival cells during drying process, maltodextrine-alginate was better than sago starch-alginate and corn starch-alginate, but was not as good as skim milk-alginate (control of treatment) as encapsulating material. Viability (number) of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of maltodextrine-alginate were 4.69±0.08 log CFU/g and 5.32±0.21 log CFU/g, while number of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of skim milk-alginate were higher 5.08±0.07 log CFU/g and 6.20±0.16 log CFU/g. L. casei more resistant than B. longum against acidic (low pH) environment. In the presence of 0.3% bile salt, L. casei and B. longum encapsulated with skim milk-alginate increased as much as 2.75±0. 02 and 1.61±0.04 log cycles, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14334/JITV.V23I4.1547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14334/JITV.V23I4.1547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

干酪乳杆菌和长双歧杆菌是食品系统中常用的干发酵剂。干发酵剂生产中的干燥过程会使益生菌的数量减少,因此有必要对益生菌进行包封。本研究的目的是为这两种益生菌获得最佳的包封材料。本研究采用以麦芽糖糊精-海藻酸盐、西米淀粉-海藻酸盐、玉米淀粉-海藻酸盐和对照处理的脱脂牛奶-海藻酸盐(w:w)为包封材料进行挤压的封装技术。4种包封材料对活性值、包封效率、湿珠和干珠中细胞数、干燥过程中存活细胞数、模拟酸和胆盐条件下被包封细胞存活数量均有显著影响。从干酪乳杆菌和长芽孢杆菌的活力、珠粒基质特性、湿珠和干珠细胞数以及干燥过程中存活细胞数等方面分析,麦芽糊精-海藻酸盐作为包封材料优于西米淀粉-海藻酸盐和玉米淀粉-海藻酸盐,但不如脱脂牛奶-海藻酸盐(对照处理)。麦芽糖糊精-海藻酸盐干球中干酪乳杆菌和长芽孢杆菌的活力(数量)分别为4.69±0.08 log CFU/g和5.32±0.21 log CFU/g,而脱脂牛奶-海藻酸盐干球中干酪乳杆菌和长芽孢杆菌的活力(数量)分别为5.08±0.07 log CFU/g和6.20±0.16 log CFU/g。干酪乳杆菌对酸性(低pH)环境的抗性强于长芽孢杆菌。在0.3%的胆盐存在下,脱脂牛奶海藻酸盐包封的干酪乳杆菌和长芽孢杆菌增加了2.75±0。分别为02和1.61±0.04个对数周期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improvement of Viability of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum with Several Encapsulating Materials using Extrusion Method
Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium longum are probiotics commonly applied as dry starter for food system. Drying process in the production of dry starter can reduce the number of probiotics, therefore they are necessary to be encapsulated. Aim of this research was to obtain best encapsulating material for both probiotics. Encapsulation technique used in this research was extrusion with maltodextrine-alginate, sago starch-alginate, corn starch-alginate, and control of treatment skim milk-alginate (w:w) as encapsulating materials.  The four encapsulating materials significantly affected the value of viability, encapsulation efficiency, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, number of survival cell during drying process, and number of survival encapsulated cell in simulated acid and bile salt conditions. Based on viability of L. casei and B. longum, beads matrix characteristic, number of cell in wet beads and dry beads, and number of survival cells during drying process, maltodextrine-alginate was better than sago starch-alginate and corn starch-alginate, but was not as good as skim milk-alginate (control of treatment) as encapsulating material. Viability (number) of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of maltodextrine-alginate were 4.69±0.08 log CFU/g and 5.32±0.21 log CFU/g, while number of L. casei and B. longum in dry beads of skim milk-alginate were higher 5.08±0.07 log CFU/g and 6.20±0.16 log CFU/g. L. casei more resistant than B. longum against acidic (low pH) environment. In the presence of 0.3% bile salt, L. casei and B. longum encapsulated with skim milk-alginate increased as much as 2.75±0. 02 and 1.61±0.04 log cycles, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信