《老友记》的元分析评价

IF 1.7 4区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2019-02-28 DOI:10.1353/ETC.2019.0006

Daniel M. Maggin, Austin H. Johnson

{"title":"《老友记》的元分析评价","authors":"Daniel M. Maggin, Austin H. Johnson","doi":"10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The following paper provides a response to the recent critique of our review of the FRIENDS For Life anxiety prevention and intervention program. In their critique, Barrett, Cooper, Stallard, Zeggio, & Gallegos-Guajardo (2017) expressed concerns on a range of conceptual, methodological, and interpretative issues. Our rejoinder addresses each of these points and reasserts our position that the primary concern with the studies was the use of the wrong unit of analysis when analyzing the data. Our response is contextualized in the importance of rigorous research as an essential component of evidence-based practice.","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"129 - 146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analytic Evaluation of FRIENDS: A Rejoinder of\",\"authors\":\"Daniel M. Maggin, Austin H. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ETC.2019.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The following paper provides a response to the recent critique of our review of the FRIENDS For Life anxiety prevention and intervention program. In their critique, Barrett, Cooper, Stallard, Zeggio, & Gallegos-Guajardo (2017) expressed concerns on a range of conceptual, methodological, and interpretative issues. Our rejoinder addresses each of these points and reasserts our position that the primary concern with the studies was the use of the wrong unit of analysis when analyzing the data. Our response is contextualized in the importance of rigorous research as an essential component of evidence-based practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"129 - 146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ETC.2019.0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要：以下论文回应了我们最近对“一生的朋友”焦虑预防和干预计划的评论。Barrett、Cooper、Stallard、Zeggio和Gallegos Guajardo（2017）在他们的评论中表达了对一系列概念、方法和解释问题的担忧。我们的反驳针对了其中的每一点，并重申了我们的立场，即研究的主要问题是在分析数据时使用了错误的分析单位。我们的回应是基于严格研究作为循证实践的重要组成部分的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Meta-Analytic Evaluation of FRIENDS: A Rejoinder of

Abstract:The following paper provides a response to the recent critique of our review of the FRIENDS For Life anxiety prevention and intervention program. In their critique, Barrett, Cooper, Stallard, Zeggio, & Gallegos-Guajardo (2017) expressed concerns on a range of conceptual, methodological, and interpretative issues. Our rejoinder addresses each of these points and reasserts our position that the primary concern with the studies was the use of the wrong unit of analysis when analyzing the data. Our response is contextualized in the importance of rigorous research as an essential component of evidence-based practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Education and Treatment of Children Multiple-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.