关于大屠杀的两个学派：斯奈德诉鲍曼案

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Studia Litteraria et Historica Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.11649/slh.2840

K. Chmielewska

{"title":"关于大屠杀的两个学派：斯奈德诉鲍曼案","authors":"K. Chmielewska","doi":"10.11649/slh.2840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article describes two approaches to the Holocaust, identified with the names of Zygmunt Bauman and Timothy Snyder. In this dyad, Bauman stands for the culturalist, sociological approach focused on identifying the social conditions in which otherness is produced and tracing the significance of modernity and bureaucracy for the Shoah. In contrast, Snyder dismisses the notion that anti-Semitism and modern statehood played a crucial part in the Holocaust. The study also identifies contemporary adherents of the two interpretations in Poland.","PeriodicalId":30881,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litteraria et Historica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Schools of Thought on the Holocaust: Snyder v Bauman\",\"authors\":\"K. Chmielewska\",\"doi\":\"10.11649/slh.2840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article describes two approaches to the Holocaust, identified with the names of Zygmunt Bauman and Timothy Snyder. In this dyad, Bauman stands for the culturalist, sociological approach focused on identifying the social conditions in which otherness is produced and tracing the significance of modernity and bureaucracy for the Shoah. In contrast, Snyder dismisses the notion that anti-Semitism and modern statehood played a crucial part in the Holocaust. The study also identifies contemporary adherents of the two interpretations in Poland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Litteraria et Historica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Litteraria et Historica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11649/slh.2840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litteraria et Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11649/slh.2840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章描述了两种处理大屠杀的方法，分别是Zygmunt Bauman和Timothy Snyder。在这二人组中，鲍曼代表了文化主义、社会学的方法，专注于识别产生另类的社会条件，并追踪现代性和官僚主义对Shoah的意义。相比之下，斯奈德驳斥了反犹太主义和现代国家地位在大屠杀中发挥关键作用的说法。这项研究还确定了波兰这两种解释的当代追随者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Two Schools of Thought on the Holocaust: Snyder v Bauman

The article describes two approaches to the Holocaust, identified with the names of Zygmunt Bauman and Timothy Snyder. In this dyad, Bauman stands for the culturalist, sociological approach focused on identifying the social conditions in which otherness is produced and tracing the significance of modernity and bureaucracy for the Shoah. In contrast, Snyder dismisses the notion that anti-Semitism and modern statehood played a crucial part in the Holocaust. The study also identifies contemporary adherents of the two interpretations in Poland.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studia Litteraria et Historica Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks