IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Aksoy, Murat Ispir, Emin Yeşi̇l
{"title":"Farklı Dizi Aralığında Eğim Açısının Fotovoltaik Sistemlerin Performansina Etkisi","authors":"M. Aksoy, Murat Ispir, Emin Yeşi̇l","doi":"10.2339/politeknik.1260228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The optimum tilt angle for a photovoltaic (PV) system depends on the row spacing because it affects the amount of shading on the panels. This study modeled PV systems for four different panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m in a fixed 3000 m² area in Konya province, Turkey. For different panel row spacings, the system performances were compared using a constant tilt angle of 35°, expressed as a proper angle for PV installations at the considered location. In addition, the optimum tilt angle is found for four different cases in terms of electricity generation. In systems with 35° tilt angles at electricity were produced annually as 622.77 MWh, 566.49 MWh, 495.36 MWh, and 385.72 MWh, respectively, for panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m. In addition, these electricity productions are 6.19%, 4.41%, 2.56%, and 0.92% higher with optimum tilt angles as 1°, 15°, 21° and 27°. Similarly, the Performance Ratio (PR) values obtained with the optimum angles are 20.61%, 8.39%, 4.12%, and 1.44%, higher than the fixed tilt angle cases. According to the economic analysis, systems with a fixed tilt angle for these panel row spacings pay back themselves in 5.13, 4.67, 4.44, and 4.28 years, respectively, while systems at optimum angles pay back themselves in a shorter time by 5.83%, 4.26%, 2.49%, and 0.91%. Furthermore, the highest NPV/INV, IRR, and ROI values were obtained from the system with 3 m panel row spacing with the optimum tilt angle of 21° as 0.915, 20.42%, and 91.57%, respectively, which is techno economically found to be the most feasible case.","PeriodicalId":44937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Polytechnic-Politeknik Dergisi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Polytechnic-Politeknik Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1260228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

光伏(PV)系统的最佳倾斜角度取决于行间距,因为它会影响面板上的遮阳量。本研究在土耳其科尼亚省一个固定的3000平方米区域内,对光伏系统进行了四种不同的面板排距(2米、2.5米、3米和4米)的建模。对于不同的面板排距,使用恒定的35°倾斜角度来比较系统性能,该角度表示为光伏装置在考虑位置的适当角度。此外,在发电方面,找到了四种不同情况下的最佳倾斜角度。在倾斜角度为35°的系统中,面板排距为2米、2.5米、3米和4米时,年发电量分别为622.77兆瓦时、566.49兆瓦时、495.36兆瓦时和385.72兆瓦时。最佳倾角为1°、15°、21°和27°时,发电量分别提高6.19%、4.41%、2.56%和0.92%。同样,最佳倾角下的性能比(PR)值分别为20.61%、8.39%、4.12%和1.44%,均高于固定倾角情况。根据经济分析,在这些面板排距的倾斜角度固定时,系统的回收期分别为5.13、4.67、4.44和4.28年,而在最佳角度下,系统的回收期较短,分别为5.83%、4.26%、2.49%和0.91%。当面板行距为3 m、最佳倾斜角度为21°时,系统的NPV/INV、IRR和ROI值最高,分别为0.915%、20.42%和91.57%,是技术经济上最可行的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Farklı Dizi Aralığında Eğim Açısının Fotovoltaik Sistemlerin Performansina Etkisi
The optimum tilt angle for a photovoltaic (PV) system depends on the row spacing because it affects the amount of shading on the panels. This study modeled PV systems for four different panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m in a fixed 3000 m² area in Konya province, Turkey. For different panel row spacings, the system performances were compared using a constant tilt angle of 35°, expressed as a proper angle for PV installations at the considered location. In addition, the optimum tilt angle is found for four different cases in terms of electricity generation. In systems with 35° tilt angles at electricity were produced annually as 622.77 MWh, 566.49 MWh, 495.36 MWh, and 385.72 MWh, respectively, for panel row spacings of 2 m, 2.5 m, 3 m, and 4 m. In addition, these electricity productions are 6.19%, 4.41%, 2.56%, and 0.92% higher with optimum tilt angles as 1°, 15°, 21° and 27°. Similarly, the Performance Ratio (PR) values obtained with the optimum angles are 20.61%, 8.39%, 4.12%, and 1.44%, higher than the fixed tilt angle cases. According to the economic analysis, systems with a fixed tilt angle for these panel row spacings pay back themselves in 5.13, 4.67, 4.44, and 4.28 years, respectively, while systems at optimum angles pay back themselves in a shorter time by 5.83%, 4.26%, 2.49%, and 0.91%. Furthermore, the highest NPV/INV, IRR, and ROI values were obtained from the system with 3 m panel row spacing with the optimum tilt angle of 21° as 0.915, 20.42%, and 91.57%, respectively, which is techno economically found to be the most feasible case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Polytechnic-Politeknik Dergisi
Journal of Polytechnic-Politeknik Dergisi ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信