山谷发烧诊断测试的付款人覆盖范围

Chloe Grace Rose, Joshua E. Kessler, Jennifer Weisbrod, Brittanie Hoang, A. Grizzle, J. Hurwitz, J. Galgiani
{"title":"山谷发烧诊断测试的付款人覆盖范围","authors":"Chloe Grace Rose, Joshua E. Kessler, Jennifer Weisbrod, Brittanie Hoang, A. Grizzle, J. Hurwitz, J. Galgiani","doi":"10.13175/swjpcc052-21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The nonspecific symptoms of Valley fever, or coccidioidomycosis, hinders its proper diagnosis. This results in unnecessary health care costs and antibiotic usage. Thus, this study seeks to determine the coverage of the Valley fever diagnostic test as provided by Arizona insurance companies to increase early diagnosis rates. Methods Through scripted messaging and telephone communications, we contacted 40 health insurance companies in Arizona about their coverage of CPT 86635 (antibody diagnostic assay for Coccidioides) without prior authorization under all plan types provided in both primary and urgent care settings. If prior authorization was required, we discussed the coverage of ICD-10 codes J18.9 (pneumonia, unspecified organism), J18.1 (lobar pneumonia, unspecified organism), or L52 (erythema nodosum). Results Of the 40 health insurance companies contacted, 25 did not answer our inquiries, most requiring member-specific information to share coverage data. The remaining 15 companies covered Valley fever testing, of which 4 required prior authorization for the ICD-10 codes of interest. Of these 15 companies, 14 provided coverage in primary and urgent care settings, and 13 provided coverage for all available plans. Conclusion All payers that provided information covered Valley Fever testing. Most of the insurance companies that were unable to answer our inquiry likely cover Valley fever testing, but were unable to share information with third party inquiries. Obtaining general coverage information is difficult, which can potentially impact patient care.","PeriodicalId":87365,"journal":{"name":"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Payer Coverage of Valley Fever Diagnostic Tests\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Grace Rose, Joshua E. Kessler, Jennifer Weisbrod, Brittanie Hoang, A. Grizzle, J. Hurwitz, J. Galgiani\",\"doi\":\"10.13175/swjpcc052-21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The nonspecific symptoms of Valley fever, or coccidioidomycosis, hinders its proper diagnosis. This results in unnecessary health care costs and antibiotic usage. Thus, this study seeks to determine the coverage of the Valley fever diagnostic test as provided by Arizona insurance companies to increase early diagnosis rates. Methods Through scripted messaging and telephone communications, we contacted 40 health insurance companies in Arizona about their coverage of CPT 86635 (antibody diagnostic assay for Coccidioides) without prior authorization under all plan types provided in both primary and urgent care settings. If prior authorization was required, we discussed the coverage of ICD-10 codes J18.9 (pneumonia, unspecified organism), J18.1 (lobar pneumonia, unspecified organism), or L52 (erythema nodosum). Results Of the 40 health insurance companies contacted, 25 did not answer our inquiries, most requiring member-specific information to share coverage data. The remaining 15 companies covered Valley fever testing, of which 4 required prior authorization for the ICD-10 codes of interest. Of these 15 companies, 14 provided coverage in primary and urgent care settings, and 13 provided coverage for all available plans. Conclusion All payers that provided information covered Valley Fever testing. Most of the insurance companies that were unable to answer our inquiry likely cover Valley fever testing, but were unable to share information with third party inquiries. Obtaining general coverage information is difficult, which can potentially impact patient care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc052-21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southwest journal of pulmonary & critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13175/swjpcc052-21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景谷热或球孢子菌病的非特异性症状阻碍了其正确诊断。这导致了不必要的医疗费用和抗生素的使用。因此,本研究旨在确定亚利桑那州保险公司提供的谷热诊断测试的覆盖率,以提高早期诊断率。方法通过脚本短信和电话沟通,我们联系了亚利桑那州的40家健康保险公司,了解他们在没有事先授权的情况下,在初级和紧急医疗机构提供的所有计划类型下,CPT 86635(球虫抗体诊断测定)的覆盖范围。如果需要事先授权,我们讨论了ICD-10代码J18.9(肺炎,未指明的生物体)、J18.1(大叶性肺炎,未指明的生物体)或L52(结节性红斑)的覆盖范围。结果在我们联系的40家健康保险公司中,有25家没有回答我们的询问,其中大多数要求会员提供特定信息以共享保险数据。其余15家公司提供谷热检测,其中4家需要事先获得ICD-10相关代码的授权。在这15家公司中,14家在初级保健和紧急保健环境中提供保险,13家为所有现有计划提供保险。结论:所有提供信息的支付者均涵盖谷热检测。大多数无法回答我们询问的保险公司可能包括谷热测试,但无法与第三方查询共享信息。获得一般覆盖信息是困难的,这可能会影响患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Payer Coverage of Valley Fever Diagnostic Tests
Background The nonspecific symptoms of Valley fever, or coccidioidomycosis, hinders its proper diagnosis. This results in unnecessary health care costs and antibiotic usage. Thus, this study seeks to determine the coverage of the Valley fever diagnostic test as provided by Arizona insurance companies to increase early diagnosis rates. Methods Through scripted messaging and telephone communications, we contacted 40 health insurance companies in Arizona about their coverage of CPT 86635 (antibody diagnostic assay for Coccidioides) without prior authorization under all plan types provided in both primary and urgent care settings. If prior authorization was required, we discussed the coverage of ICD-10 codes J18.9 (pneumonia, unspecified organism), J18.1 (lobar pneumonia, unspecified organism), or L52 (erythema nodosum). Results Of the 40 health insurance companies contacted, 25 did not answer our inquiries, most requiring member-specific information to share coverage data. The remaining 15 companies covered Valley fever testing, of which 4 required prior authorization for the ICD-10 codes of interest. Of these 15 companies, 14 provided coverage in primary and urgent care settings, and 13 provided coverage for all available plans. Conclusion All payers that provided information covered Valley Fever testing. Most of the insurance companies that were unable to answer our inquiry likely cover Valley fever testing, but were unable to share information with third party inquiries. Obtaining general coverage information is difficult, which can potentially impact patient care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信