基于计算生物力学模型的汽车与行人碰撞中挡风玻璃倾角对头部/脑损伤的影响

IF 2.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Fang Wang, Mingliang Wang, Lin Hu, Ke Peng, Jiajie Yin, Danqi Wang, Liangliang Shi, Zhou Zhou
{"title":"基于计算生物力学模型的汽车与行人碰撞中挡风玻璃倾角对头部/脑损伤的影响","authors":"Fang Wang, Mingliang Wang, Lin Hu, Ke Peng, Jiajie Yin, Danqi Wang, Liangliang Shi, Zhou Zhou","doi":"10.1093/tse/tdad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Car-to-pedestrian collision (CPC) accidents occur frequently, and pedestrians often suffer serious head/brain injuries. One major cause is the primary impact with the windshield. Here, we use a numerical simulation method to study the influence of the windshield inclination angle of a passenger car on pedestrian head/brain injury due to CPC accidents. The range of the windshield inclination angle was set to 24°–50°, with an interval of 2°. The results show that the windshield angle significantly affects the pedestrian kinematics and exerts different effects on the head injury when evaluating with various head injury criteria. Regarding the head peak linear/rotational acceleration and acceleration-based criteria head injury criterion (HIC)/rotational injury criterion (RIC), the predictions at the secondary impact stage have no clear relationship with the windshield angle (R2 = 0.04, 0.07, 0.03 and 0.26, respectively), and their distributions are scattered. In the primary impact, the peak linear acceleration and HIC show a weak trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increasing of the windshield angle, and the rotational acceleration and RIC tend to remain relatively constant. Regarding the cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) criterion, the predictions at the primary impact are slightly lower than those at the secondary impact, and the trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in the windshield angle is observed at both impact stages. When the windshield inclination angle is approximately 32°–40°, the head injury severity in both impact phases is generally lower than that predicted at other windshield angles.","PeriodicalId":52804,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Safety and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of the windshield inclination angle on head/brain injuries in car-to-pedestrian collisions using computational biomechanics models\",\"authors\":\"Fang Wang, Mingliang Wang, Lin Hu, Ke Peng, Jiajie Yin, Danqi Wang, Liangliang Shi, Zhou Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tse/tdad016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Car-to-pedestrian collision (CPC) accidents occur frequently, and pedestrians often suffer serious head/brain injuries. One major cause is the primary impact with the windshield. Here, we use a numerical simulation method to study the influence of the windshield inclination angle of a passenger car on pedestrian head/brain injury due to CPC accidents. The range of the windshield inclination angle was set to 24°–50°, with an interval of 2°. The results show that the windshield angle significantly affects the pedestrian kinematics and exerts different effects on the head injury when evaluating with various head injury criteria. Regarding the head peak linear/rotational acceleration and acceleration-based criteria head injury criterion (HIC)/rotational injury criterion (RIC), the predictions at the secondary impact stage have no clear relationship with the windshield angle (R2 = 0.04, 0.07, 0.03 and 0.26, respectively), and their distributions are scattered. In the primary impact, the peak linear acceleration and HIC show a weak trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increasing of the windshield angle, and the rotational acceleration and RIC tend to remain relatively constant. Regarding the cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) criterion, the predictions at the primary impact are slightly lower than those at the secondary impact, and the trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in the windshield angle is observed at both impact stages. When the windshield inclination angle is approximately 32°–40°, the head injury severity in both impact phases is generally lower than that predicted at other windshield angles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Safety and Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Safety and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdad016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Safety and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tse/tdad016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

车辆与行人碰撞(CPC)事故频繁发生,行人经常遭受严重的头部/脑部损伤。一个主要原因是对挡风玻璃的主要冲击。本文采用数值模拟的方法,研究乘用车挡风玻璃倾角对CPC事故中行人头部/脑损伤的影响。挡风玻璃倾角范围设置为24°-50°,间隔为2°。结果表明,在不同的颅脑损伤评价标准下,挡风玻璃角度对行人运动学有显著影响,且对颅脑损伤的影响不同。对于头部峰值线性/旋转加速度和基于加速度的颅脑损伤判据(HIC)/旋转损伤判据(RIC),二次碰撞阶段的预测结果与挡风玻璃角度关系不明显(R2分别为0.04、0.07、0.03和0.26),且分布较为分散。初次碰撞时,随着挡风玻璃角度的增大,直线加速度峰值和HIC呈先减小后增大的微弱趋势,旋转加速度峰值和RIC趋于相对恒定。在累积应变损伤测度(CSDM)准则下,初始冲击时的预测值略低于二次冲击时的预测值,且在两个冲击阶段均随挡风玻璃角度的增大呈现先减小后增大的趋势。当挡风玻璃倾角约为32°-40°时,两个碰撞阶段的头部损伤严重程度通常低于其他挡风玻璃角度下的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of the windshield inclination angle on head/brain injuries in car-to-pedestrian collisions using computational biomechanics models
Car-to-pedestrian collision (CPC) accidents occur frequently, and pedestrians often suffer serious head/brain injuries. One major cause is the primary impact with the windshield. Here, we use a numerical simulation method to study the influence of the windshield inclination angle of a passenger car on pedestrian head/brain injury due to CPC accidents. The range of the windshield inclination angle was set to 24°–50°, with an interval of 2°. The results show that the windshield angle significantly affects the pedestrian kinematics and exerts different effects on the head injury when evaluating with various head injury criteria. Regarding the head peak linear/rotational acceleration and acceleration-based criteria head injury criterion (HIC)/rotational injury criterion (RIC), the predictions at the secondary impact stage have no clear relationship with the windshield angle (R2 = 0.04, 0.07, 0.03 and 0.26, respectively), and their distributions are scattered. In the primary impact, the peak linear acceleration and HIC show a weak trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increasing of the windshield angle, and the rotational acceleration and RIC tend to remain relatively constant. Regarding the cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) criterion, the predictions at the primary impact are slightly lower than those at the secondary impact, and the trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in the windshield angle is observed at both impact stages. When the windshield inclination angle is approximately 32°–40°, the head injury severity in both impact phases is generally lower than that predicted at other windshield angles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Safety and Environment
Transportation Safety and Environment TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信