任务型学习与导师制对外科技术专业学生外科能力感知及临床教育状况的影响

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
Hanieh Bahadori, Behzad Imani, M. Amiri
{"title":"任务型学习与导师制对外科技术专业学生外科能力感知及临床教育状况的影响","authors":"Hanieh Bahadori, Behzad Imani, M. Amiri","doi":"10.4103/nms.nms_136_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: It is important to investigate the effectiveness of various educational methods in different cultural, educational, and clinical contexts. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of task-based learning (TBL) and mentorship on clinical perioperative competence and clinical education condition of surgical technology students. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 50 undergraduate surgical technology students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2021. Students were selected by the convenience sampling method and were randomized into one of the two groups of TBL or mentorship. Students completed a Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised questionnaire and a Clinical Education Conditions questionnaire before and after the intervention. Chi-square, independent, and pair samples t-tests were used for data analysis. Results: The pretest mean scores of perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition were, respectively, 106.56 ± 18.34 and 55.56 ± 9.45 in the TBL group and 99.72 ± 16.08 and 53.64 ± 6.89 in mentorship group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in mean overall clinical competence and mean clinical education condition (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the mean scores for perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition increased significantly to 128.92 ± 12.49 and 69.80 ± 6.38 in the TBL group (P < 0.001) and 120.24 ± 16.75 and 69.04 ± 7.23 in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). The posttest mean score of perceived clinical competence was significantly greater in the TBL group than in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the TBL and mentorship methods are effective in improving the clinical competence and clinical education condition of undergraduate surgical technology students.","PeriodicalId":45398,"journal":{"name":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of task-based learning and mentorship on the perceived surgical competency and clinical education condition of surgical technology students\",\"authors\":\"Hanieh Bahadori, Behzad Imani, M. Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/nms.nms_136_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: It is important to investigate the effectiveness of various educational methods in different cultural, educational, and clinical contexts. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of task-based learning (TBL) and mentorship on clinical perioperative competence and clinical education condition of surgical technology students. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 50 undergraduate surgical technology students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2021. Students were selected by the convenience sampling method and were randomized into one of the two groups of TBL or mentorship. Students completed a Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised questionnaire and a Clinical Education Conditions questionnaire before and after the intervention. Chi-square, independent, and pair samples t-tests were used for data analysis. Results: The pretest mean scores of perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition were, respectively, 106.56 ± 18.34 and 55.56 ± 9.45 in the TBL group and 99.72 ± 16.08 and 53.64 ± 6.89 in mentorship group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in mean overall clinical competence and mean clinical education condition (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the mean scores for perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition increased significantly to 128.92 ± 12.49 and 69.80 ± 6.38 in the TBL group (P < 0.001) and 120.24 ± 16.75 and 69.04 ± 7.23 in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). The posttest mean score of perceived clinical competence was significantly greater in the TBL group than in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the TBL and mentorship methods are effective in improving the clinical competence and clinical education condition of undergraduate surgical technology students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing and Midwifery Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing and Midwifery Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_136_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing and Midwifery Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nms.nms_136_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究不同文化、教育和临床背景下各种教育方法的有效性很重要。目的:本研究旨在比较任务型学习(TBL)和指导对外科技术专业学生临床围手术期能力和临床教育条件的影响。方法:对哈马丹医科大学2021级外科技术专业50名本科生进行准实验研究。学生采用方便抽样法进行选择,并被随机分为两组TBL或导师制。学生在干预前后完成了围手术期感知能力量表修订问卷和临床教育条件问卷。数据分析采用卡方检验、独立检验和配对样本t检验。结果:TBL组的感知临床能力和临床教育状况的测试前平均分分别为106.56±18.34和55.56±9.45,导师组为99.72±16.08和53.64±6.89。两组患者的平均综合临床能力和平均临床教育程度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),TBL组的临床感知能力和临床教育状况的平均得分显著增加到128.92±12.49和69.80±6.38(P<0.001),导师组的临床认知能力的测试后平均得分分别为120.24±16.75和69.04±7.23(P<0.01)。结论:TBL和导师制相结合的教学方法能有效地提高外科技术专业本科生的临床能力和临床教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of task-based learning and mentorship on the perceived surgical competency and clinical education condition of surgical technology students
Background: It is important to investigate the effectiveness of various educational methods in different cultural, educational, and clinical contexts. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of task-based learning (TBL) and mentorship on clinical perioperative competence and clinical education condition of surgical technology students. Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted on 50 undergraduate surgical technology students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in 2021. Students were selected by the convenience sampling method and were randomized into one of the two groups of TBL or mentorship. Students completed a Perceived Perioperative Competence Scale-Revised questionnaire and a Clinical Education Conditions questionnaire before and after the intervention. Chi-square, independent, and pair samples t-tests were used for data analysis. Results: The pretest mean scores of perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition were, respectively, 106.56 ± 18.34 and 55.56 ± 9.45 in the TBL group and 99.72 ± 16.08 and 53.64 ± 6.89 in mentorship group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in mean overall clinical competence and mean clinical education condition (P > 0.05). After the intervention, the mean scores for perceived clinical competence and clinical education condition increased significantly to 128.92 ± 12.49 and 69.80 ± 6.38 in the TBL group (P < 0.001) and 120.24 ± 16.75 and 69.04 ± 7.23 in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). The posttest mean score of perceived clinical competence was significantly greater in the TBL group than in the mentorship group (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the TBL and mentorship methods are effective in improving the clinical competence and clinical education condition of undergraduate surgical technology students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
29 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信