冲动性-反思性认知风格学生解数题模式的误区分析

Aqila Firda Istinabila, D. K. Fardah
{"title":"冲动性-反思性认知风格学生解数题模式的误区分析","authors":"Aqila Firda Istinabila, D. K. Fardah","doi":"10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.ppdf_525-535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the online learning process since March 2020, many students have experienced misconceptions in solving the questions given by the teacher, including mathematics learning activities. In online learning activities students are required to be able to understand the material quickly with all the limitations that students have so that misconceptions arise in students. This misconception can occur, one of which is influenced by differences in students' cognitive styles. This study aims to analyze students' misconceptions in solving problems related to number pattern material. The analysis was carried out on 1 subject with impulsive cognitive style and 1 subject with reflective cognitive style with the same learning outcomes. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Supporting instruments include the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) and a written test consisting of 9 multiple choice questions which include sub-materials of arithmetic number series, geometric number series, letter number series, and contextual questions related to PATTERNS OF NUMBERS  with 4 answer choices. To analyze students' misconceptions, the Three Tier test method is used, namely the first tier consists of number pattern material questions in the form of multiple choice with 4 answer choices, the second tier is the column for students' reasons for giving answers, and the third tier is a column of students' confidence levels using the CRI method, and continue with the interview. The results showed that students with impulsive cognitive style experienced classificational, correlational, and theoretical misconceptions. Meanwhile, students with reflective cognitive style are correlation misconceptions and theoretical misconceptions. To anticipate the occurrence of misconceptions, teachers should provide variations in the learning process, so that students can focus on the learning process and teachers often check students' understanding of concepts. \nKeywords: Number pattern, Misconception, Cognitive Style, Three Tier, CRI","PeriodicalId":31516,"journal":{"name":"MATHEdunesa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MISCONCEPTION ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS WITH IMPULSIVE-REFLECTIVE COGNITIVE STYLE IN SOLVING PATTERNS OF NUMBERS PROBLEMS\",\"authors\":\"Aqila Firda Istinabila, D. K. Fardah\",\"doi\":\"10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.ppdf_525-535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the online learning process since March 2020, many students have experienced misconceptions in solving the questions given by the teacher, including mathematics learning activities. In online learning activities students are required to be able to understand the material quickly with all the limitations that students have so that misconceptions arise in students. This misconception can occur, one of which is influenced by differences in students' cognitive styles. This study aims to analyze students' misconceptions in solving problems related to number pattern material. The analysis was carried out on 1 subject with impulsive cognitive style and 1 subject with reflective cognitive style with the same learning outcomes. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Supporting instruments include the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) and a written test consisting of 9 multiple choice questions which include sub-materials of arithmetic number series, geometric number series, letter number series, and contextual questions related to PATTERNS OF NUMBERS  with 4 answer choices. To analyze students' misconceptions, the Three Tier test method is used, namely the first tier consists of number pattern material questions in the form of multiple choice with 4 answer choices, the second tier is the column for students' reasons for giving answers, and the third tier is a column of students' confidence levels using the CRI method, and continue with the interview. The results showed that students with impulsive cognitive style experienced classificational, correlational, and theoretical misconceptions. Meanwhile, students with reflective cognitive style are correlation misconceptions and theoretical misconceptions. To anticipate the occurrence of misconceptions, teachers should provide variations in the learning process, so that students can focus on the learning process and teachers often check students' understanding of concepts. \\nKeywords: Number pattern, Misconception, Cognitive Style, Three Tier, CRI\",\"PeriodicalId\":31516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MATHEdunesa\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MATHEdunesa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.ppdf_525-535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MATHEdunesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n2.ppdf_525-535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在2020年3月以来的在线学习过程中,许多学生在解决老师提出的问题时遇到了误解,包括数学学习活动。在在线学习活动中,学生需要能够快速理解材料,克服学生的所有限制,从而在学生中产生误解。这种误解可能会发生,其中之一是受学生认知风格差异的影响。本研究旨在分析学生在解决与数字模式材料有关的问题时的误解。对1名具有冲动性认知风格的受试者和1名具有反思性认知风格且学习结果相同的受试人进行了分析。这类研究是定性的描述性研究。支持工具包括匹配熟悉图形测试(MFFT)和一项由9道选择题组成的笔试,其中包括算术数字系列、几何数字系列、字母数字系列的子材料,以及与数字模式相关的上下文问题,共有4个答案选择。为了分析学生的误解,采用了三层测试方法,即第一层由4个答案选择的多选形式的数字模式材料问题组成,第二层是学生给出答案的原因栏,第三层是使用CRI方法的学生信心水平栏,并继续面试。结果表明,冲动型认知风格的学生经历了分类、关联和理论上的误解。同时,具有反思性认知风格的学生存在相关误解和理论误解。为了预测误解的发生,教师应该在学习过程中提供变化,以便学生能够专注于学习过程,教师经常检查学生对概念的理解。关键词:数字模式,误解,认知风格,三层,CRI
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MISCONCEPTION ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS WITH IMPULSIVE-REFLECTIVE COGNITIVE STYLE IN SOLVING PATTERNS OF NUMBERS PROBLEMS
In the online learning process since March 2020, many students have experienced misconceptions in solving the questions given by the teacher, including mathematics learning activities. In online learning activities students are required to be able to understand the material quickly with all the limitations that students have so that misconceptions arise in students. This misconception can occur, one of which is influenced by differences in students' cognitive styles. This study aims to analyze students' misconceptions in solving problems related to number pattern material. The analysis was carried out on 1 subject with impulsive cognitive style and 1 subject with reflective cognitive style with the same learning outcomes. This type of research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Supporting instruments include the Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) and a written test consisting of 9 multiple choice questions which include sub-materials of arithmetic number series, geometric number series, letter number series, and contextual questions related to PATTERNS OF NUMBERS  with 4 answer choices. To analyze students' misconceptions, the Three Tier test method is used, namely the first tier consists of number pattern material questions in the form of multiple choice with 4 answer choices, the second tier is the column for students' reasons for giving answers, and the third tier is a column of students' confidence levels using the CRI method, and continue with the interview. The results showed that students with impulsive cognitive style experienced classificational, correlational, and theoretical misconceptions. Meanwhile, students with reflective cognitive style are correlation misconceptions and theoretical misconceptions. To anticipate the occurrence of misconceptions, teachers should provide variations in the learning process, so that students can focus on the learning process and teachers often check students' understanding of concepts. Keywords: Number pattern, Misconception, Cognitive Style, Three Tier, CRI
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信