初级稳定性是种植牙成功的必备条件吗?文献系统综述

Abdurrahman A AlSamman
{"title":"初级稳定性是种植牙成功的必备条件吗?文献系统综述","authors":"Abdurrahman A AlSamman","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Implant primary stability is considered a prerequisite of implant osseointegration and ultimately, implant success. The prognosis of dental implants installed with low or without primary stability is still unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the survival rate of implants placed with low/without primary stability and to diagnose risk factors that might affect outcomes of such implants.\n\nMaterial and methods: Electronic search in the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE-PubMed) was performed on articles published in English up to September 2020. The terms (MeSH words) used in the search were ‘Dental’ OR ‘Oral’ AND ‘Implant’ AND ‘Survival’ OR ‘Success’ AND ‘Stability’ OR ‘Low stability’ AND ‘Insertion torque’. In addition to the online databases of selected journals. Randomized and controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and prospective or retrospective case series were included.\n\nResults: Of the retrieved 386 publications, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1632 implants, giving a survival rate of 96.32%. No statistically significant influence of the type and site of implantation on implant survival was recorded. A significant higher failure rate of immediately loaded implants that than those with delayed loading protocols.\n\nConclusion: Poor primary stability might not negatively affect the survival rates of non-immediately loaded dental implants.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Primary Stability Is Mandatory For Dental Implant Success? A Systematic Review Of Literature\",\"authors\":\"Abdurrahman A AlSamman\",\"doi\":\"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Implant primary stability is considered a prerequisite of implant osseointegration and ultimately, implant success. The prognosis of dental implants installed with low or without primary stability is still unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the survival rate of implants placed with low/without primary stability and to diagnose risk factors that might affect outcomes of such implants.\\n\\nMaterial and methods: Electronic search in the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE-PubMed) was performed on articles published in English up to September 2020. The terms (MeSH words) used in the search were ‘Dental’ OR ‘Oral’ AND ‘Implant’ AND ‘Survival’ OR ‘Success’ AND ‘Stability’ OR ‘Low stability’ AND ‘Insertion torque’. In addition to the online databases of selected journals. Randomized and controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and prospective or retrospective case series were included.\\n\\nResults: Of the retrieved 386 publications, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1632 implants, giving a survival rate of 96.32%. No statistically significant influence of the type and site of implantation on implant survival was recorded. A significant higher failure rate of immediately loaded implants that than those with delayed loading protocols.\\n\\nConclusion: Poor primary stability might not negatively affect the survival rates of non-immediately loaded dental implants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-4(1)-121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:种植体的初始稳定性被认为是种植体骨整合和最终成功的先决条件。安装的牙科植入物的初级稳定性较低或没有初级稳定性,其预后仍不清楚。这项系统综述的目的是评估植入物的存活率,植入物的主要稳定性较低/没有,并诊断可能影响此类植入物结果的风险因素。材料和方法:在国家医学图书馆(MEDLINE PubMed)对截至2020年9月以英语发表的文章进行电子检索。搜索中使用的术语(MeSH词)是“牙科”或“口腔”和“植入物”和“存活”或“成功”和“稳定性”或“低稳定性”和“插入扭矩”。除了选定期刊的在线数据库之外。包括随机和对照临床试验、队列研究、病例对照研究以及前瞻性或回顾性病例系列。结果:在检索到的386篇出版物中,有24项研究符合纳入标准,共有1632个植入物,存活率为96.32%。没有记录到植入类型和部位对植入物存活率的统计学显著影响。立即加载植入物的失败率明显高于延迟加载方案的植入物。结论:初级稳定性差可能不会对未立即加载的牙种植体的存活率产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Primary Stability Is Mandatory For Dental Implant Success? A Systematic Review Of Literature
Background: Implant primary stability is considered a prerequisite of implant osseointegration and ultimately, implant success. The prognosis of dental implants installed with low or without primary stability is still unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the survival rate of implants placed with low/without primary stability and to diagnose risk factors that might affect outcomes of such implants. Material and methods: Electronic search in the National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE-PubMed) was performed on articles published in English up to September 2020. The terms (MeSH words) used in the search were ‘Dental’ OR ‘Oral’ AND ‘Implant’ AND ‘Survival’ OR ‘Success’ AND ‘Stability’ OR ‘Low stability’ AND ‘Insertion torque’. In addition to the online databases of selected journals. Randomized and controlled clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and prospective or retrospective case series were included. Results: Of the retrieved 386 publications, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1632 implants, giving a survival rate of 96.32%. No statistically significant influence of the type and site of implantation on implant survival was recorded. A significant higher failure rate of immediately loaded implants that than those with delayed loading protocols. Conclusion: Poor primary stability might not negatively affect the survival rates of non-immediately loaded dental implants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信