医院单位临床恶化跨专业管理的关键因素和模型:范围界定综述。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Sylvain Boloré, Jessica Garcia-Loiseau
{"title":"医院单位临床恶化跨专业管理的关键因素和模型:范围界定综述。","authors":"Sylvain Boloré, Jessica Garcia-Loiseau","doi":"10.1891/RTNP-2021-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Situations of clinical deterioration compromise patient safety, and their management can be a challenge for professionals. In this review, we synthesize the problematic factors for clinicians during the collective management of patient clinical deterioration in hospital units, and we provide a modeling of the action processes involved in patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC were systematically searched, and studies were critically appraised with MMAT. Seventeen articles were identified from 1222 for full-text screening. Data were deductively coded according to the Systems Analysis of Clinical Incidents model developed by Taylor-Adams and Vincent (2004), and results were consolidated using a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faced with these uncertain and rapidly changing situations, great adaptability is essential, and the quality of social interactions is a central issue for the effectiveness of teamwork. Interprofessional management of patients in clinical deterioration is complex due to multiple factors related to patients, professionals, tasks, environment, and teamwork. Caregivers' sense of worry about the patient's evolution is a key factor in early detection and therefore in the implementation of interventions.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The model of four action processes proposed (Evaluation-Solicitation-Articulation-Composition) constitutes the points of attention for patient safety. It aims to guide the activities of the interprofessional collective involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":51287,"journal":{"name":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key Factors and Modeling of Interprofessional Management of Clinical Deterioration in Hospital Units: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sylvain Boloré, Jessica Garcia-Loiseau\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/RTNP-2021-0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Situations of clinical deterioration compromise patient safety, and their management can be a challenge for professionals. In this review, we synthesize the problematic factors for clinicians during the collective management of patient clinical deterioration in hospital units, and we provide a modeling of the action processes involved in patient safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC were systematically searched, and studies were critically appraised with MMAT. Seventeen articles were identified from 1222 for full-text screening. Data were deductively coded according to the Systems Analysis of Clinical Incidents model developed by Taylor-Adams and Vincent (2004), and results were consolidated using a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faced with these uncertain and rapidly changing situations, great adaptability is essential, and the quality of social interactions is a central issue for the effectiveness of teamwork. Interprofessional management of patients in clinical deterioration is complex due to multiple factors related to patients, professionals, tasks, environment, and teamwork. Caregivers' sense of worry about the patient's evolution is a key factor in early detection and therefore in the implementation of interventions.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The model of four action processes proposed (Evaluation-Solicitation-Articulation-Composition) constitutes the points of attention for patient safety. It aims to guide the activities of the interprofessional collective involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2021-0093\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Theory for Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/RTNP-2021-0093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:临床病情恶化会危及患者安全,其管理对专业人员来说是一项挑战。在这篇综述中,我们归纳了临床医生在医院科室集体处理患者临床病情恶化过程中的问题因素,并对涉及患者安全的行动过程进行了建模:对电子数据库 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE 和 ERIC 进行了系统检索,并使用 MMAT 对研究进行了严格评估。从 1222 篇文章中筛选出 17 篇进行全文检索。根据 Taylor-Adams 和 Vincent(2004 年)开发的临床事件系统分析模型,对数据进行了演绎编码,并使用叙述性综合法对结果进行了整合:面对这些不确定且瞬息万变的情况,极强的适应能力至关重要,而社会互动的质量则是团队合作有效性的核心问题。由于患者、专业人员、任务、环境和团队合作等多重因素,对临床病情恶化患者的跨专业管理十分复杂。护理人员对患者病情发展的忧患意识是及早发现并实施干预措施的关键因素:提出的四个行动过程模型(评估-征询-阐述-构成)构成了患者安全的关注点。它旨在指导相关跨专业集体的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key Factors and Modeling of Interprofessional Management of Clinical Deterioration in Hospital Units: A Scoping Review.

Background and purpose: Situations of clinical deterioration compromise patient safety, and their management can be a challenge for professionals. In this review, we synthesize the problematic factors for clinicians during the collective management of patient clinical deterioration in hospital units, and we provide a modeling of the action processes involved in patient safety.

Methods: Electronic databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC were systematically searched, and studies were critically appraised with MMAT. Seventeen articles were identified from 1222 for full-text screening. Data were deductively coded according to the Systems Analysis of Clinical Incidents model developed by Taylor-Adams and Vincent (2004), and results were consolidated using a narrative synthesis.

Results: Faced with these uncertain and rapidly changing situations, great adaptability is essential, and the quality of social interactions is a central issue for the effectiveness of teamwork. Interprofessional management of patients in clinical deterioration is complex due to multiple factors related to patients, professionals, tasks, environment, and teamwork. Caregivers' sense of worry about the patient's evolution is a key factor in early detection and therefore in the implementation of interventions.

Implications for practice: The model of four action processes proposed (Evaluation-Solicitation-Articulation-Composition) constitutes the points of attention for patient safety. It aims to guide the activities of the interprofessional collective involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research and Theory for Nursing Practice focuses on issues relevant to improving nursing practice, education, and patient care. The articles strive to discuss knowledge development in its broadest sense, reflect research using a variety of methodological approaches, and combine several methods and strategies in a single study. Because of the journal''s international emphasis, article contributors address the implications of their studies for an international audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信